Invyr Holy Panda vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Invyr Holy Panda and the Bsun Hutt both offer unique tactile experiences that cater to enthusiasts seeking a satisfying typing experience. The Holy Panda is celebrated for its sharp tactility and bright "clack" sound, making it a favorite among those who enjoy pronounced feedback. On the other hand, the Hutt switch boasts a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, along with a balanced sound profile that provides a distinctive typing experience. While both switches are categorized as 'Snappy', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', and 'Accented', the Holy Panda is known for its acoustic resonance, while the Hutt switch offers a more balanced sound profile. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the Bsun Hutt are quite similar, with both switches utilizing polycarbonate for the top housing. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, making it ideal for switches if you plan to use RGB lighting. The use of polycarbonate in the top housing of both switches ensures a clear and resonant sound with a sleek aesthetic appeal. As a result, users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of sound and feel when using either the Holy Panda or the Hutt, thanks to their shared polycarbonate top housing.
However, where the Holy Panda and the Hutt differ is in their bottom housing material. The Holy Panda features a nylon bottom housing, which offers a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softness and sound-absorbing properties. On the other hand, the Hutt also utilizes a nylon bottom housing, providing a similar typing experience with a rounder and duller sound profile. While the top housing may have a more significant impact on the sound when letting go of a key, the bottom housing plays a crucial role in the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch.
Overall, the use of polycarbonate in the top housing of both the Invyr Holy Panda and the Bsun Hutt ensures a consistent sound profile with a sharp and crisp tone. The differences in their nylon bottom housing, while subtle, contribute to a slightly varied typing experience with the Holy Panda offering a deeper and fuller sound compared to the Hutt. Whether you prefer a sharper sound profile or a rounder one, both switches deliver a unique typing experience that caters to different preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, it is evident that there are significant differences between the two. The Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it medium-heavy, while the Hutt has a bottom out force of 49 grams, which is considered light. The actuation force for the Holy Panda is not specified, while the Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams. The Holy Panda provides a more substantial typing experience with its heavier bottom out force, while the Hutt offers a lighter touch, ideal for longer typing sessions or gaming. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference, with some preferring a lighter actuation force and others opting for a heavier bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. In this case, the Holy Panda has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Hutt. The 4 mm travel distance of the Holy Panda is more traditional, providing a deeper keypress feel, which some users may prefer for a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the 3.5 mm travel distance of the Bsun Hutt offers a slightly shorter keypress, which can be favored by gamers looking for quicker response times. Both switches offer a tactile typing experience, but the Holy Panda provides a longer keypress while the Hutt offers a slightly shorter one. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Holy Panda switch is well-known for its bright "clack" with each keystroke, providing a satisfying and pronounced feedback that resonates distinctly. On the other hand, the Hutt switch is described as having a balanced sound profile with a higher-pitched and clean resonant sound. Both switches offer distinctive auditory experiences, with the Holy Panda showcasing a sharper tactile bump sound compared to the Hutt's immersive auditory experience. Ultimately, your choice of keyboard and keycaps will also play a significant role in the overall sound produced by these switches.
In terms of feel, both the Holy Panda and Hutt switches offer a snappy and invigorating typing sensation, with a moderate to firm actuation force. The Holy Panda is known for its sharp tactile bump, providing a pronounced and immersive typing experience that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. Likewise, the Hutt switch offers a similar level of tactility and responsiveness, making it a comfortable choice for tactile switch enthusiasts looking for a medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump. Both switches deliver a balanced feel with a satisfying amount of feedback, ensuring a pleasant typing experience for users.
In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda and Bsun Hutt tactile switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel, catering to different preferences among tactile switch enthusiasts. While the Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility and bright "clack" sound, the Hutt switch provides a balanced sound profile and a snappy typing sensation. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will depend on personal preferences regarding sound, feel, and typing experience. Whether you opt for the Holy Panda or the Hutt switch, you can expect a satisfying tactile feedback and an enjoyable typing experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Invyr Holy Panda and the Bsun Hutt tactile switches, consider the bottom out force that best suits your preference. If you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force, opt for the Holy Panda with its sharp tactility and satisfying "clack" sound. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force, the Hutt switch with its distinctive tactile bump and balanced sound profile may be more suitable for you. Both switches offer their unique typing experiences, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of feel and sound.
Mentioned in this article
