Bsun Hutt vs. Gateron Quinn
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the Gateron Quinn switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Bsun Hutt and the Gateron Quinn mechanical keyboard switches, both tactile switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The Hutt switch is known for its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump, providing a balanced sound profile and an invigorating typing experience. On the other hand, the Quinn switch stands out for its crisp, light switch-like tactility and deep, resonant sound profile due to its nylon housings. While the Hutt switch offers a sharp and accentuated typing experience, the Quinn switch provides a more polished and buttery feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
59g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
22mm double-stage gold-plated
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and the Gateron Quinn both feature different housing materials for their top and bottom housings. The Hutt utilizes polycarbonate for its top housing, creating a sharper and crisper sound profile that is ideal for RGB lighting due to its translucency. On the other hand, the Quinn uses nylon for its top housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile that absorbs more sound for a duller and rounder tone. While they both offer unique sound profiles, the Hutt's polycarbonate top housing is known for its clear and resonant sound, while the Quinn's nylon top housing provides a more mellow and subdued typing experience.
In terms of bottom housings, both the Hutt and the Quinn opt for nylon material. This choice results in a deeper and fuller sound profile for both switches, as nylon is known for absorbing sound and creating a duller tone compared to harder plastics. The nylon bottom housing of each switch contributes to the overall typing experience by impacting the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on a key. Despite having different top housings, the use of nylon for the bottom housing ensures that both the Hutt and the Quinn offer a similar typing experience in terms of sound and feel.
Overall, the choice of housing materials in the Bsun Hutt and the Gateron Quinn plays a significant role in shaping the sound profile and typing experience of each switch. The contrasting use of polycarbonate and nylon for the top housings results in unique sound characteristics, with the Hutt offering a sharper and crisper sound while the Quinn provides a deeper and fuller tone. However, the shared nylon bottom housing ensures a consistent and familiar typing experience in terms of sound absorption and tactile feedback. Whether you prefer a brighter sound profile with the Hutt's polycarbonate top housing or a more subdued tone with the Quinn's nylon top housing, both switches offer quality housing materials that contribute to an enjoyable typing experience.
Weight
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams and a lighter bottom out force of 49 grams, making it ideal for those who prefer a gentler typing experience. On the other hand, the Gateron Quinn tactile switch boasts a heavier actuation force of 59 grams and a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams, providing a more substantial push feel during typing. Those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Gateron Quinn, while those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Bsun Hutt. Both switches offer distinct advantages based on individual preferences, but overall, the Hutt provides a lighter typing feel while the Quinn offers a heavier and more substantial typing experience.
Travel distance
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Gateron Quinn tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both switches fall into the category of shorter travel distances, which are favored by gamers for faster response times. The slight difference in travel distance between the two switches may not be noticeable to most users, as they are both relatively short. However, if you prefer a slightly deeper key press, the Bsun Hutt may feel slightly more satisfying compared to the Gateron Quinn. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches may come down to personal preference in terms of key press depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The Gateron Quinn has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Quinn for $5.50.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Bsun Hutt switch offers a resonant and immersive auditory experience with a clean and sharp sound profile. On the other hand, the Gateron Quinn switch provides a deeper and richer sound profile with bassy tones, clacky characteristics, and low-pitched resonance. Both switches offer unique sound profiles that can add character to the typing experience, with the Hutt leaning towards a higher-pitched clean sound and the Quinn providing a bass-heavy, rich sound.
In terms of feel, both the Hutt and Quinn switches are described as snappy and responsive, offering a lively typing experience. The Hutt switch is further characterized by invigorating feedback and a sharp, prominent tactile bump, while the Quinn switch is also accented for its medium level of tactility. Additionally, the Quinn switch offers a polished, bouncy, buttery, and creamy typing experience, providing smooth and refined key travel with a spring-like rebound sensation.
Overall, both the Bsun Hutt and Gateron Quinn switches offer unique and enjoyable typing experiences with their distinctive sound profiles and tactile feels. While the Hutt switch emphasizes a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump for a balanced sound profile, the Quinn switch showcases a specially designed nylon housing for a crisp and light tactility paired with a deep and resonant sound profile. Regardless of the choice between the two switches, users can expect a precise and satisfying typing experience with either option, as both switches provide a high level of responsiveness and tactile feedback for an immersive typing sensation.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when deciding between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Gateron Quinn tactile switch, consider the specific features and characteristics that each switch offers. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a balanced sound profile with a prominent tactile bump, the Hutt switch may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a medium-heavy bottom out force and enjoy a unique combination of crisp tactility and a deep, resonant sound profile, the Quinn switch could be more suitable for your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the typing experience you aim to achieve. Choose the switch that aligns best with your desired sound and feel for a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
