Invyr Holy Panda vs. TTC Iron
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the TTC Iron switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Invyr Holy Panda and the TTC Iron offer distinct experiences for users. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, making it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the TTC Iron linear switch boasts a pronounced clacky sound signature and buttery smooth travel, appealing to those looking for a light and precise typing experience. While the Holy Panda is characterized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', and 'Snappy', the Iron is described as 'Easy-to-press', 'Clacky', 'Mild', and 'Neutral'. Each switch has its strengths and appeals to different preferences, so it's important to consider what qualities are most important to you. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
41g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The Invyr Holy Panda and the TTC Iron both utilize different housing materials for their top and bottom housings, resulting in distinct sound profiles. The Holy Panda features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. In contrast, the Iron uses a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound. While the Holy Panda's nylon bottom housing contributes to a deeper and fuller sound, the Iron's POM bottom housing also adds to the deeper sound profile. Despite these differences, both switches aim to deliver a satisfying typing experience with unique acoustic characteristics.
One noticeable difference between the two switches lies in the materials used for their top housings. The polycarbonate top housing of the Holy Panda offers a clear and resonant sound profile, ideal for those looking to enhance their typing experience with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the POM top housing of the Iron creates a distinct sound that leans towards the deeper end of the spectrum. While the Holy Panda emphasizes clarity and sharpness in sound, the Iron provides a more subdued and muted sound profile. These contrasting qualities make each switch suitable for different preferences and typing styles.
When considering the impact of housing materials on the overall sound and feel of a switch, it is essential to recognize how the bottom and top housings contribute to the overall typing experience. The bottom housing of a switch, whether it's nylon or POM, plays a significant role in shaping the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed down. On the other hand, the top housing, whether it's polycarbonate or POM, affects the sound when a key is released. By understanding the unique qualities of each housing material, users can choose a switch that aligns with their desired sound profile and typing preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the TTC Iron linear switch, it is evident that the Holy Panda has a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams compared to the Iron's lighter 50 grams. The actuation force of the Iron is also lighter at 41 grams, while the Holy Panda's actuation force is unknown. Since the actuation force of the Holy Panda is not specified, it is difficult to determine if it is lighter or heavier than the Iron in this aspect. In terms of weight considerations, those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Iron switch, while those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may opt for the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will come down to personal preference based on the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the TTC Iron linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. Both switches offer a relatively traditional travel distance, with the Holy Panda being slightly longer. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Iron switch for quicker response times, while those who enjoy a more hearty keystroke may prefer the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Holy Panda is best known for its sharp tactility that produces a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Iron switch is characterized by a pronounced clacky sound signature that adds an aural satisfaction to the typing experience. Both switches offer unique sound profiles that can enhance the overall typing experience, with the Holy Panda providing a more tactile auditory feedback compared to the Iron.
Moving on to feel, the Holy Panda is widely praised for its invigorating and sharp tactile feedback, offering a pronounced tactile bump that is both snappy and reactive. This creates an immersive typing sensation that is satisfying for tactile switch enthusiasts. In contrast, the Iron switch is described as easy-to-press and mild, offering a gentle typing experience with minimal resistance during key presses. While the Holy Panda excels in providing a more pronounced tactile feel, the Iron switch caters to users looking for a smoother and lighter keystroke.
In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda and the TTC Iron switches cater to different preferences in terms of sound and feel. The Holy Panda excels in providing a sharp and tactile "clack" sound with pronounced tactile feedback, making it ideal for those seeking a more immersive typing experience. On the other hand, the Iron switch offers a lighter actuation force and a smoother travel, appealing to users looking for a more effortless typing experience. Depending on your preference for sound and feel, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance your typing experience, providing a satisfying and enjoyable performance. Whether you prefer sharp tactility or a lighter touch, both switches offer distinct options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the TTC Iron linear switch, you should consider the type of typing experience you prefer. If you enjoy a sharp tactility with a satisfyingly bright "clack" sound and pronounced feedback, the Holy Panda is the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a light actuation force, buttery smooth travel, and a pronounced clacky sound signature that adds an aural satisfaction to your typing experience, then the TTC Iron linear switch would be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on the specific characteristics that align with your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
