Invyr Holy Panda vs. KTT Mannan Pipefish
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Mannan Pipefish switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Invyr Holy Panda, a tactile switch, and the KTT Mannan Pipefish, a linear switch, it becomes evident that they offer distinct advantages for different types of users. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" sound with each keystroke, making it ideal for tactile switch enthusiasts who appreciate pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance. On the other hand, the Mannan Pipefish offers a smooth linear action, coupled with a light 45g actuation and bottom-out force, creating an effortless and strain-free typing experience perfect for casual typists. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Mannan Pipefish are quite similar, as both switches use polycarbonate for the top housing. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, making it ideal for those looking for a more distinct typing experience. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is beneficial for those who want to add RGB lighting to their keyboards. However, where they differ is in the bottom housing material. The Holy Panda uses a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, absorbing more sound than harder plastics. On the other hand, the Mannan Pipefish also utilizes a nylon bottom housing, sharing this characteristic with the Holy Panda.
Despite both switches sharing similar housing materials for their top and bottom housings, the slight variations in the manufacturing process can lead to subtle differences in their sound profiles. While both the Holy Panda and the Mannan Pipefish offer a sharp, high-pitched sound thanks to their polycarbonate top housing, the use of nylon in the bottom housing of both switches provides a deeper and fuller sound when typing. This combination of materials allows for a well-rounded typing experience, with the top housing influencing the sound upon key release and the bottom housing impacting the bottom-out sound and feel.
In conclusion, the choice between the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Mannan Pipefish ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and typing experience. Both switches offer a unique combination of polycarbonate and nylon housing materials that result in a clear, resonant sound profile with different levels of depth and fullness. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound or a deeper, fuller tone, both switches deliver a satisfying typing experience that is sure to enhance any keyboard setup.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, there are noticeable differences between the two. The Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch, while the Mannan Pipefish has a bottom out force of 45 grams, categorizing it as a lighter switch. Additionally, the Holy Panda does not provide a specific actuation force, while the Mannan Pipefish has an actuation force of 37 grams. The lighter actuation force of the Mannan Pipefish may appeal to those who prefer a lighter typing experience, allowing for longer periods of comfortable typing. On the other hand, the heavier bottom out force of the Holy Panda may cater to individuals who prefer a more substantial and tactile typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on personal preference, with weight playing a crucial role in determining the typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. When comparing the two switches, users can expect a similar feel in terms of how much the switch travels from the top to the bottom. The travel distance of 4 mm for both switches indicates that there won't be a noticeable difference in the keypress experience in this regard. So, whether you choose the Holy Panda or the Mannan Pipefish, you can expect to get similar results when it comes to how far the switch travels during use.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The KTT Mannan Pipefish has an MSRP of $3.53 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mannan Pipefish for $3.05.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Invyr Holy Panda is known for its satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, providing a pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance that is unmatched in the tactile switch realm. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish is described as having a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for a wide range of users and purposes. Ultimately, the sound of a switch is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
When it comes to feel, the Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, offering a blend of pronounced feedback and a satisfyingly snappy and reactive typing experience. With descriptors like "Accented," "Invigorating," "Sharp," and "Snappy," the Holy Panda provides a unique and immersive typing sensation that appeals to tactile switch enthusiasts. Conversely, the Mannan Pipefish is characterized by its easy-to-press keys and polished finish, offering a smooth and refined typing experience. These qualities make it ideal for casual typists seeking a comfortable and strain-free typing journey.
In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda and KTT Mannan Pipefish switches offer distinct qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles. The Holy Panda stands out for its sharp tactility and pronounced feedback, while the Mannan Pipefish excels in providing a smooth and effortless typing experience. Depending on whether you prioritize tactile feedback or a comfortable typing feel, both switches offer excellent options to enhance your keyboarding experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on your personal preferences and typing needs.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, consider your typing preferences and needs. If you prefer a switch with sharp tactility, pronounced feedback, and a medium-heavy bottom out force, the Holy Panda may be the perfect choice for you. On the other hand, if you value a smooth and light typing experience with effortless key presses and reduced finger fatigue, the Mannan Pipefish could be the ideal option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what feels most comfortable and enjoyable for your typing style.
Mentioned in this article
