Jerrzi Honey Bean vs. KTT Mint
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Mint switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Honey Bean and KTT Mint both offer unique characteristics worth comparing. The Honey Bean is praised for its light and linear action, along with its silent operation, making it a perfect choice for shared environments where noise reduction is important. On the other hand, the Mint provides a smooth linear typing experience with a satisfying poppy thockiness due to its long pole stem. While the Honey Bean is described as 'easy-to-press' and 'feathery', the Mint is characterized as 'low-pitched' and 'polished'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal, making them suitable for different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15mm spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Mint provide unique sound profiles based on their composition. The Honey Bean's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the Mint's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and higher-pitched sound. This contrast in sound profiles is due to the difference in stiffness between POM and polycarbonate plastics. The translucency of polycarbonate also makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the Honey Bean's POM bottom housing contribution to a deeper and fuller sound contrasts with the Mint's nylon bottom housing, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder profile.
Despite the differences in housing materials between the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Mint, the impact of each material is felt throughout the switch. When pressing down on a switch, the qualities of the bottom housing come into play, affecting the bottom-out sound and feel. In comparison, the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. This split between top and bottom housing allows for a balanced and varied sound experience with each press of the switch. The choice between POM and polycarbonate, or nylon, affects not only the sound profile but also the overall typing experience for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
In conclusion, while both the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Mint offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials, they cater to different preferences. The POM housing of the Honey Bean provides a pleasing and deeper sound, while the polycarbonate and nylon housings of the Mint create sharper and duller sound profiles, respectively. Whether one prefers a crisper sound or a fuller sound, the choice of housing material in a switch can significantly impact the overall typing experience. Ultimately, enthusiasts can experiment with different housing materials to find the perfect sound profile that suits their preferences.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, it is evident that the Mint switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Honey Bean's 42 grams. Additionally, the Mint switch has a bottom out force of 53 grams, which is medium-light, while the bottom out force of the Honey Bean is unknown. This means that the Mint switch provides a slightly firmer typing experience overall. The lighter actuation force of the Honey Bean may be preferred by those who enjoy typing for extended periods of time without fatigue, while the heavier Mint switch may be more appealing to users seeking a more substantial typing feel. Both switches offer a unique typing experience, with the Mint switch being slightly heavier in terms of force required for key presses.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the KTT Mint linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Mint has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Honey Bean. The Honey Bean's 3.7 mm distance falls on the shorter side, making it a preferred choice for gamers looking for quick response times. On the other hand, the Mint's 4 mm travel distance provides a bit more depth when typing, which may be preferred by those looking for a more substantial feel when pressing down on the keys. Both switches offer a different feel due to their travel distance, so the choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preference for typing or gaming experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Honey Bean has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Honey Bean for $3.59.
The KTT Mint comes in at $2.91 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch offers a muted typing experience, perfect for those looking for a quieter option in shared spaces. On the other hand, the KTT Mint linear switch provides a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, giving a satisfying auditory feedback without being too disruptive. Both switches offer a pleasant typing sound that won't be bothersome to those around you, making them suitable for office or home environments.
Moving on to feel, the Jerrzi Honey Bean switch is praised for its easy-to-press and feathery feel, providing a light and effortless typing experience that reduces finger fatigue. In contrast, the KTT Mint switch offers a mild and polished typing feel, giving a gentle and refined touch to each keystroke. Both switches offer a comfortable typing experience with their smooth linear action, catering to different preferences in terms of key press resistance and overall typing sensation.
In conclusion, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the KTT Mint linear switch both have their unique qualities that make them appealing to mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. Whether you prefer a quieter typing experience with the Honey Bean or a slightly more tactile feel with the Mint, you can expect a satisfying and smooth performance from either switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and typing feel, but rest assured that both switches will deliver a premium typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when it comes to choosing between the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, you'll want to consider your environment and personal preferences. If you prioritize a silent typing experience and minimal noise, the Honey Bean switches would be the ideal choice for you. Their light and linear action, combined with their mute sound, make them perfect for office or shared spaces where quietness is key. On the other hand, if you enjoy a smooth and poppy typing feel with a light actuation force, the Mint switches would be more suitable for you. Their low-pitched sound and polished finish offer a satisfying typing experience that is versatile for various settings. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what feels best for your typing needs and environment.
Mentioned in this article
