Aflion Iceberg vs. TTC Iron
An in-depth look at the Aflion Iceberg and the TTC Iron switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Aflion Iceberg and the TTC Iron mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Iceberg from Aflion is known for its smoothness and two-stage spring, providing a satisfying feel for users. Its characteristics of being 'clacky,' 'high-pitched,' 'snappy,' 'feathery,' and 'subtle' offer a range of tactile experiences. On the other hand, the TTC Iron is celebrated for its pronounced clacky sound and light actuation, making it ideal for fatigue-free typing sessions. With its 'easy-to-press,' 'clacky,' 'mild,' and 'neutral' attributes, the Iron appeals to both enthusiasts and everyday users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
41g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20mm two-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Aflion Iceberg and the TTC Iron, it is clear that the Iceberg utilizes a polycarbonate top housing while the Iron features a POM top housing. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while POM produces a deeper and more muted sound. Both materials have their own unique characteristics that contribute to the overall sound profile of the switch. The use of polycarbonate in the Iceberg's housing provides a more resonant and clear sound, whereas POM in the Iron's housing creates a pleasing and unique sound experience.
Moving on to the bottom housing materials, the Iceberg utilizes a nylon bottom housing, while the Iron features a POM bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, which absorbs more sound. On the other hand, POM in the Iron's bottom housing also contributes to a deeper and more muted sound profile. Both materials bring their own qualities to the switch, with nylon providing a duller and rounder sound compared to the more pleasing and unique sound produced by POM.
In summary, while the top and bottom housing materials of the Aflion Iceberg and TTC Iron differ, they each contribute uniquely to the sound profile of the switches. The polycarbonate and nylon housing of the Iceberg provide a sharper and fuller sound profile, respectively, while the POM housing of the Iron creates a deeper and more muted sound experience. Despite their differences, both switches offer a range of sound profiles that cater to different preferences and typing styles.
Weight
The Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the TTC Iron linear switch both have relatively light actuation and bottom out forces, with the Iceberg being slightly lighter. The Iceberg has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the Iron has an actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. These lighter forces make them ideal for users who prefer a gentler typing experience. Those who enjoy typing for extended periods or engaging in long gaming sessions may appreciate the lighter actuation and bottom out forces of both switches. However, for users who prefer a more substantial typing feel, they may opt for switches with heavier forces. Overall, the difference in actuation and bottom out forces between the Iceberg and Iron switches is minimal, so users can expect to get similar results in terms of key press feedback when using either switch.
Travel distance
The Aflion Iceberg linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the TTC Iron linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Iceberg being slightly longer than the Iron. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Iron for faster response times, while those who enjoy a more substantial keypress may opt for the Iceberg. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches comes down to personal preference and the desired typing experience. Both switches offer a satisfactory typing experience, but the slight difference in travel distance may make a noticeable impact for some users.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Iceberg has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iceberg for $3.07.
The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Iceberg and Iron switches both offer a clacky sound profile, providing a sharp and satisfying auditory experience with each press. While the Iceberg leans towards a high-pitched sound, the Iron offers a more neutral sound that is suitable for various environments and preferences. Ultimately, the choice between the two would come down to personal preference and the overall sound profile desired, as both switches are known for their crisp and percussive characteristics.
In terms of feel, the Iceberg switch offers a snappy and feathery typing experience, providing a combination of responsiveness and lightness that can enhance typing sessions. On the other hand, the Iron switch is described as easy-to-press and mild, offering a gentle typing experience with low resistance and a comfortable feel. Both switches aim to reduce finger fatigue and provide an enjoyable typing experience, making them suitable for different preferences and typing styles.
Taking all available information into consideration, it is clear that both the Iceberg and Iron switches have their own unique qualities that can appeal to different users. Whether you prefer a higher-pitched sound and snappier feel with the Iceberg switch, or a more neutral sound and easy-to-press feel with the Iron switch, you can expect a satisfying typing experience with either choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two would depend on your personal preferences in terms of sound, feel, and overall typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the TTC Iron linear switch, consider the following factors. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force of 45 grams and enjoy a smooth and fulfilling typing experience, the Iceberg switch from Aflion would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you appreciate a slightly heavier bottom out force of 50 grams and a pronounced clacky sound signature with buttery smooth travel, the TTC Iron switch would suit your preferences better. Ultimately, whether you prioritize a light and snappy feel or a swift and clacky sound profile, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences. Evaluate your typing style and preferences to determine which switch aligns best with your needs.
Mentioned in this article
