TTC Iron vs. Durock Light Tactile
An in-depth look at the TTC Iron and the Durock Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When looking at the TTC Iron linear switch and the Durock Light Tactile switch, one is immediately struck by their differences in sound and feel. The TTC Iron boasts a pronounced clacky sound signature that resonates with each press, providing an aural satisfaction to the typing experience. On the other hand, the Durock Light Tactile switch offers a gentle tactile feedback that is a refreshing departure from sharper tactile switches. The Iron switch is lauded for its easy-to-press nature and swift actuation, making it a great choice for those seeking precision and pleasure in their typing sessions. In contrast, the Light Tactile switch is praised for its gentle tactility and jelly-like sound, providing a more subdued typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
41g
Actuation force
52g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the TTC Iron and the Durock Light Tactile switches offer distinct sound profiles due to their different compositions. The Iron features a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound. In contrast, the Light Tactile utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. The use of polycarbonate in the Light Tactile switch allows for a more resonant sound profile, particularly beneficial for users looking to incorporate RGB lighting due to its translucency. On the other hand, the POM bottom housing of the Iron contributes to a similar deep and muted sound profile as the top housing.
In terms of bottom housing materials, the Iron and the Light Tactile switches diverge once again. The Iron's POM bottom housing delivers a sound profile that aligns with its top housing, creating an overall consistent experience. On the other hand, the Light Tactile incorporates a nylon bottom housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile. The use of nylon, a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, contributes to a duller and rounder sound compared to the crisper sound produced by the polycarbonate top housing.
Overall, the combination of different housing materials in the TTC Iron and the Durock Light Tactile switches provides users with contrasting sound profiles. The split between the top and bottom housing impacts both the sound and feel of typing on these switches. While the bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing a key, the top housing plays a significant role in the sound created when releasing a key. Despite the differences in housing materials, both switches offer unique and pleasing sound profiles that cater to individual preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the TTC Iron linear switch and the Durock Light Tactile tactile switch, it is evident that the Iron is lighter in both aspects. The Iron has an actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a lighter option overall. On the other hand, the Light Tactile has an actuation force of 52 grams and a bottom out force of 67 grams, which is medium-heavy in comparison. The difference in weight between the two switches can significantly impact the typing experience for users. Those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Iron switch for longer typing sessions or gaming, while those who desire a more substantial typing feel may opt for the heavier Light Tactile switch. Both switches provide unique typing experiences based on their actuation and bottom out forces, offering users the opportunity to choose based on their individual preferences.
Travel distance
The TTC Iron linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Durock Light Tactile tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Iron has a shorter travel distance compared to the Light Tactile. The difference may not be significant, but it can affect the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers, in particular, may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Iron for faster response times. On the other hand, those who prefer a more pronounced key press may opt for the Light Tactile with its slightly longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.
The Durock Light Tactile has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Light Tactile for $4.25.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the TTC Iron linear switch stands out for its clacky sound signature, offering a sharp and snappy sound with each press. In contrast, the Durock Light Tactile switch provides a more neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various environments and preferences. Both switches can be enhanced further by the choice of keyboard, keycaps, and surrounding factors, influencing the overall auditory experience.
In terms of feel, the TTC Iron linear switch is praised for its easy-to-press nature, requiring minimal force for activation and reducing finger fatigue during prolonged typing sessions. On the other hand, the Durock Light Tactile switch offers a mild tactile experience, providing a gentle typing feel that is approachable to most users. Additionally, the polished finish of the Light Tactile switch promotes smooth key travel and reduced friction, enhancing the overall typing experience.
Considering the information provided, the TTC Iron linear switch and the Durock Light Tactile switch offer distinct qualities in sound and feel. While the Iron switch excels in providing a clacky sound and easy-to-press feel, the Light Tactile switch offers a neutral sound profile, a mild tactile experience, and a polished finish for smooth key travel. Depending on individual preferences and typing requirements, both switches present compelling options for enthusiasts and everyday users alike, ensuring a satisfying typing experience with each keystroke. If you are seeking similar results in terms of sound and feel, either of these switches could provide a delightful typing experience based on your personal preferences.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering which switch to choose between the TTC Iron linear switch and the Durock Light Tactile tactile switch, you should opt for the TTC Iron if you prefer a light actuation force, buttery smooth travel, and a pronounced clacky sound signature for a satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, if you lean towards a gentler tactility, a jelly-like sound signature, and a slightly higher bottom out force, the Durock Light Tactile switch would be the better option. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your personal preferences for typing feel, sound profile, and actuation force.
Mentioned in this article
