United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

TTC Iron vs. Outemu Red Panda

An in-depth look at the TTC Iron and the Outemu Red Panda switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When looking at the TTC Iron linear switch and the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch, one can immediately notice the distinct characteristics of each. The TTC Iron is praised for its clacky sound signature and light actuation, making it a popular choice for those looking for a smooth and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Red Panda offers a light-medium amount of tactility, coupled with a unique bottom-out sound and top-out sound. Both switches have their own appeal, with the Iron being categorized as 'Easy-to-press' and 'Clacky', while the Red Panda falls under 'Thocky' and 'Mild'. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

41g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

3.30 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The TTC Iron's POM housing creates a deep and muted sound profile, which is pleasing to many users. In contrast, the Outemu Red Panda's polycarbonate housing produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. The difference in sound profiles can be attributed to the properties of the materials used - POM being softer and polycarbonate being stiffer. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, adding an aesthetic element to the housing material.

In terms of the bottom housing, the POM housing of the TTC Iron provides a deep and unique sound profile, similar to its top housing. On the other hand, the nylon bottom housing of the Outemu Red Panda offers a deeper and fuller sound experience. Nylon's softer properties allow it to absorb more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound profile. The choice of bottom housing material can significantly impact the overall sound and feel of the switch, making it an important consideration for keyboard enthusiasts.

When comparing the overall sound and feel of switches with different top and bottom housings, it is important to note that each housing material contributes unique qualities to the typing experience. The bottom housing affects the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing impacts the sound when releasing a key. By understanding the properties of materials such as POM, polycarbonate, and nylon, keyboard enthusiasts can make informed decisions on which housing material best suits their preferences for sound and typing experience.

Weight

The TTC Iron linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 41 grams compared to the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch, which has a heavier actuation force of 50 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Iron requires 50 grams to fully press down, while the Red Panda needs 60 grams. The lighter actuation force of the Iron switch may appeal to those who prefer a lighter typing experience for longer periods of time, while the heavier actuation force and bottom out force of the Red Panda may provide a more substantial and tactile typing experience. Overall, the Iron switch is lighter in both actuation and bottom out force, while the Red Panda is heavier in comparison. Users looking for a lighter typing feel may prefer the Iron switch, while those who prefer a heavier tactile experience may opt for the Red Panda switch.

Travel distance

The TTC Iron linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm. In this case, the Red Panda has a shorter travel distance compared to the Iron switch. The difference may not seem significant, but it can affect the typing or gaming experience for some users. The Iron switch may provide a slightly deeper keypress feel due to its longer travel distance, which could be preferred by individuals who like a more substantial keypress. On the other hand, the Red Panda switch's shorter travel distance might be more appealing to those looking for a quicker response time. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the type of typing or gaming experience desired.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.

The Outemu Red Panda comes in at $3.40 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the TTC Iron linear switch is known for its clacky and sharp sound profile, providing a crisp and percussive auditory experience with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch offers a thocky sound, characterized by a deep and rich tone that is more satisfying and softer in comparison. This means that while the Iron switch produces a louder and more pronounced sound, the Red Panda switch offers a deeper and more satisfying auditory feedback.

In terms of feel, the TTC Iron switch is praised for its easy-to-press nature, offering a light actuation force that makes typing effortless and comfortable, reducing finger fatigue during long typing sessions. It falls in the category of mild switches, providing a gentle typing experience that appeals to a wide range of users. Similarly, the Outemu Red Panda switch is also described as mild, offering a gentle typing experience that is approachable to most users. This indicates that both switches provide a comfortable and responsive typing feel, but with slightly different characteristics in terms of actuation force and tactile feedback.

Overall, while the TTC Iron linear switch and the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch differ in terms of sound and feel, they both offer high-quality performance and a satisfying typing experience. Choosing between the two would ultimately depend on personal preferences for sound and tactile feedback. If a user enjoys a sharper and more clacky sound with easy actuation, the TTC Iron switch would be a great choice. On the other hand, if a user prefers a deeper and more thocky sound with a mild typing experience, the Outemu Red Panda switch would be the preferred option. Ultimately, both switches are capable of delivering a premium typing experience, catering to different preferences in sound and feel.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when choosing between the TTC Iron linear switch and the Outemu Red Panda tactile switch, consider the following guidelines. Opt for the TTC Iron if you prefer a light actuation force, buttery smooth travel, and a pronounced clacky sound signature that adds a satisfying element to your typing experience. This switch is ideal for enthusiasts and daily users seeking precision and pleasure in every keystroke. On the other hand, choose the Outemu Red Panda if you enjoy a light-medium amount of tactility, alongside a bassier bottom-out sound and a clackier top-out sound. This switch offers a gentle typing experience that is approachable to most users. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your preference for sound, feel, and typing style.

Mentioned in this article