United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

TTC Iron vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion

An in-depth look at the TTC Iron and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the TTC Iron linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, we find two compelling options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. The TTC Iron is renowned for its pronounced clacky sound signature and remarkably light actuation, providing a satisfying typing experience with swift, fatigue-free sessions. On the other hand, the WS Onion stands out with its buttery smooth keystrokes, crisp and responsive feel, and neutral sound profile, thanks to its polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing. Both switches offer a unique typing experience, with the Iron being easy-to-press and clacky, while the Onion is buttery and polished. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

41g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

63.5g

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring

Housing materials

The TTC Iron and the Wuque Studio WS Onion both offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials. The Iron's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the WS Onion's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper, higher-pitched sound. In terms of aesthetics, the translucent polycarbonate top housing of the WS Onion is especially useful for RGB lighting effects, while the opaque POM top housing of the Iron offers a more traditional look. Additionally, the use of different materials in the top housing can significantly impact the overall typing experience, with POM providing a more subdued sound and polycarbonate offering a crisper sound.

When it comes to the bottom housing, the Iron's POM bottom housing and the WS Onion's nylon bottom housing both contribute to the overall sound profile of the switches. POM bottoms create a deeper and fuller sound, while nylon bottoms absorb more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. The choice between these materials can affect the overall typing experience, with POM offering a more resonant sound and nylon providing a softer and more muted sound. Despite their differences, both materials play a crucial role in shaping the unique sound profile of each switch.

In summary, the housing materials of the TTC Iron and the Wuque Studio WS Onion play a significant role in determining the sound profile and typing experience of each switch. While the Iron uses POM for both top and bottom housings, creating a consistent sound profile, the WS Onion utilizes polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing, resulting in a more varied sound experience. Ultimately, the choice between POM and polycarbonate, or nylon for the bottom housing, comes down to personal preference and the desired sound and feel for the keyboard.

Weight

In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the TTC Iron linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, it is evident that the Iron switch is lighter in both aspects. The Iron switch has an actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the WS Onion switch has an unknown actuation force and a bottom out force of 63.5 grams. The difference in weight between the two switches may impact the typing experience for users. Those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Iron switch for longer typing sessions or gaming, while those who prefer a heavier feel may opt for the WS Onion switch for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences regarding actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The TTC Iron linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch has a travel distance of 4mm. This makes the WS Onion the longer of the two switches. The difference may seem small, but it can have an impact on the feel and performance of the switches. Gamers looking for faster response times may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Iron switch, while those who prefer a more substantial keypress may opt for the WS Onion. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, so users can expect similar results in terms of overall feel and performance, with the main difference being the slight variance in distance between the two options.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.

The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When comparing the sound of the TTC Iron linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, we find that the Iron offers a distinctive clacky sound, providing a sharp and percussive auditory experience with each press. On the other hand, the WS Onion boasts a neutral sound profile, offering a moderate and versatile sound suitable for various environments. While both switches offer different sound characteristics, the choice ultimately depends on personal preference and the overall setup of the keyboard.

Moving on to feel, the TTC Iron switch is characterized by its easy-to-press nature, requiring minimal force for activation and providing a mild typing experience that enhances comfort during prolonged typing sessions. In contrast, the WS Onion switch offers a buttery smooth feel, delivering a seamless and polished typing sensation that is both effortless and gratifying. Both switches excel in providing a satisfying tactile experience; however, the decision between the two would depend on individual typing preferences and comfort levels.

In conclusion, the TTC Iron linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch each offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Iron switch delivers a clacky sound and an easy-to-press feel, the WS Onion switch provides a neutral sound profile and a buttery, polished typing experience. Whether you prefer a more distinct auditory feedback or a smoother, buttery feel, both switches cater to different preferences and typing styles. Ultimately, the choice between these switches comes down to personal preference and the desired typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the TTC Iron linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prioritize a light actuation force and a pronounced clacky sound, the TTC Iron switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy actuation force with a buttery smooth keystroke feel and a neutral sound profile, the WS Onion switch could be the better option. Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences, so it ultimately comes down to what feels more comfortable and satisfying for you.

Mentioned in this article