KTT Kang White vs. Keygeek Keygeek Raw
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Kang White and Keygeek Keygeek Raw both offer unique qualities to enhance your typing experience. The Kang White is praised for its poppy linear feel and dazzling typing sound, thanks to its self-lubricating material that provides unparalleled smoothness. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw stands out for its unique material blend of Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon, creating a creamy yet lightweight switch with a slightly textured feel. While the Kang White is known for its low-pitched and neutral characteristics, the Keygeek Raw offers a textured, mild, neutral, and subtle typing experience. Each switch has its own strengths and appeal, making it important to consider your preferences and typing style before making a decision. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
57.5g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon & UPE blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
UMPE & Si blend
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches offer different sound profiles and tactile experiences. The Kang White's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer plastic nature, which is ideal for RGB lighting effects. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw's Nylon & UPE blend top housing provides a unique sound profile exclusive to Keygeek Raw switches. On the other hand, the Kang White's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer plastic nature that absorbs more sound. In comparison, the Keygeek Raw's UMPE & Si blend bottom housing also provides an exclusive sound experience for users.
While both switches offer a unique blend of housing materials for top and bottom components, the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches provide distinct sound profiles and tactile feedback. The use of polycarbonate in the Kang White's top housing creates a clear and resonant sound, ideal for those who prefer a sharper sound profile when typing. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw's Nylon & UPE blend top housing offers a different sound quality exclusive to their switches. Similarly, the Kang White's nylon bottom housing elicits a deeper sound profile, while the Keygeek Raw's UMPE & Si blend bottom housing provides a different tactile experience for users.
Overall, the choice between the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and tactile feedback. While both switches boast unique housing materials for top and bottom components, the Kang White excels in providing a sharper and crisper sound profile with its polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw offers a different sound experience with its exclusive Nylon & UPE blend top housing and UMPE & Si blend bottom housing. In essence, users can expect similar results in terms of housing material impact on sound and feel when typing on either switch.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch both fall in the medium range. The Kang White has a slightly lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Keygeek Raw's unknown actuation force. However, the Kang White has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 58 grams compared to the Keygeek Raw's bottom out force of 57.5 grams. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Kang White may be the better option due to its lower actuation force. On the other hand, individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing feel may lean towards the Keygeek Raw for its slightly heavier bottom out force. Ultimately, both switches offer a balance between actuation and bottom out forces, providing a comfortable typing experience for users.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, it is evident that the Keygeek Raw has a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm compared to the 4 mm travel distance of the KTT Kang White. The Kang White offers a more traditional travel distance, while the Keygeek Raw provides a shallower feel. Gamers looking for faster response times may opt for the Keygeek Raw with its shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial keypress experience may lean towards the KTT Kang White. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and keypress feedback.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The KTT Kang White linear switch is renowned for its low-pitched sound profile, offering a more bass-heavy and mellow typing experience. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw linear switch provides a similar neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various settings. When it comes to feel, the Kang White switch does not have specific descriptors provided, suggesting a more standard typing experience. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw switch offers a textured feel right out of the box, providing a slightly rougher sensation that some users may prefer. Overall, both switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel, catering to different preferences within the mechanical keyboard community. While the Kang White excels in smoothness and low-pitched sound, the Keygeek Raw stands out with its creamy yet lightweight feel and slightly textured touch. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and typing style when choosing between these two distinctive linear switches.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the KTT Kang White linear switch or the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, the decision ultimately comes down to your personal preference and typing experience. If you prioritize a poppy linear switch with a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, the Kang White may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a unique material blend that offers a delightfully creamy yet lightweight feel, the Keygeek Raw switch might be more suitable. Additionally, if you enjoy a low-pitched typing sound, the Kang White is the way to go, while the Keygeek Raw provides a neutral sound profile. Lastly, if you prefer a switch with a subtle texture and mild typing feel, the Keygeek Raw has you covered. Ultimately, both switches have their own strengths and characteristics, so it's important to choose based on what aligns best with your preferences and typing style.
Mentioned in this article
