KTT Kang White vs. Keygeek Keylin
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keylin switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switches can significantly influence your typing experience, and two noteworthy options are the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keylin, both of which are linear switches. The Kang White switch is celebrated for its delightful sound profile, characterized as low-pitched and neutral, paired with an exceptional smoothness thanks to its self-lubricating material. This quality makes it a popular choice for those who seek a pleasurable auditory and tactile feedback during long typing sessions. On the other hand, the Keygeek Keylin switch stands out with its innovative molds, offering a premium typing experience that boasts rich acoustics and remarkable smoothness as well. While both switches deliver a satisfying linear feel without tactile bumps, their unique sound characteristics and construction may appeal to different types of users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
38g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
48g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
21mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keylin present a compelling comparison, particularly in their top housing components. The KTT Kang White utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, known for its rigidity and clarity, which results in a sharper and crisper sound profile. This material's translucency also amplifies RGB lighting effects, enhancing the visual experience for users. In contrast, the Keylin features a nylon top housing, which is characterized by its softer texture and ability to absorb sound. This results in a deeper, fuller sound profile that has a rounder quality compared to the Kang White's sharper tones. While both materials serve distinct auditory experiences, the KTT Kang White's polycarbonate composition is specifically advantageous for users looking for vivid lighting effects alongside pronounced sound clarity.
When examining the bottom housings of both switches, the KTT Kang White and the Keygeek Keylin exhibit a striking similarity. Both models employ nylon for their bottom housings, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile. This consistency in material choice means that no matter which switch model is being engaged, the typing experience will maintain a sound-dampening quality due to the nylon's inherent softness. Additionally, the shared bottom housing material will influence the bottom-out sound and feel equally across both switch types, ensuring that users can expect a similar tactile response when pressing down on the keys, even if the overall sound profile may differ thanks to their top housings.
Ultimately, the interplay of materials in the KTT Kang White and Keygeek Keylin switches influences the characteristics of sound produced during both key presses and releases. With the Kang White's polycarbonate top and nylon bottom housing creating a unique blend of sharper and fuller sounds, and the Keylin relying solely on the warmth of nylon in both the top and bottom, users can appreciate diverse auditory experiences. For those who value the clarity and brilliance of sound, the Kang White might be the better option, while the Keylin appeals to users seeking a richer, more muted experience. Nevertheless, both switches highlight how housing materials contribute critically to the overall performance of mechanical switches, reflecting preferences in audiophile and gaming contexts alike.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Keygeek Keylin linear switch, the differences in actuation force and bottom out force highlight their distinct characteristics. The Kang White has a higher actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, positioning it as a medium-weight option appealing to those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. In contrast, the Keylin is lighter, featuring an actuation force of just 38 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, catering to users who prioritize comfort during extended typing sessions. Consequently, those who lean towards a heavier feel will find the Kang White more suitable, while the Keylin would be ideal for those seeking ease of pressing with its lighter force. Ultimately, the choice between these switches ultimately depends on personal preference for typing feel and endurance.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Keygeek Keylin linear switch, the Kang White stands out with a distance of 4 mm, while the Keylin offers a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. This makes the Keylin the more responsive option, as shorter travel distances are often favored by gamers for quicker response times. However, the Kang White, with its longer travel distance, may appeal to those who prefer a more substantial depth in their key presses, offering a more tactile experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences—those who appreciate a rapid response may gravitate toward the Keylin, whereas those seeking a fuller sensation during key presses might opt for the Kang White.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Keygeek Keylin has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keylin for $3.29.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Kang White linear switch produces a unique auditory experience characterized by a low-pitched and neutral profile. The low-pitched quality offers a bass-heavy and mellow tone, which is often preferred by users looking for a more subdued acoustic environment. This makes the Kang White suitable for various settings, whether at home or in an office where noise might be a concern. Since the sonic characteristics can also be influenced by the keyboard's construction and the keycaps used, the overall sound experience can be tailored to some extent. In contrast, the sound profile of the Keygeek Keylin switch remains unreported, leaving its specific acoustic qualities somewhat unknown. However, it is acknowledged that the Keylin switches are designed to deliver rich acoustics, which suggests a potentially vibrant sound, accentuating the quality of their new molds.
Moving on to the feel, the KTT Kang White is notable for its seamless smoothness owing to the self-lubricating material used in the switch. This feature allows for a consistently smooth typing experience, which is a hallmark of high-quality linear switches. The Keygeek Keylin, while its tactile feedback characteristics are not explicitly described, promises exceptional smoothness as well. This indicates that both switches are likely to provide a pleasant and fluid typing experience, although the precise nuances of the Keylin's feel are yet to be disclosed.
In summary, the KTT Kang White linear switch stands out with its remarkable sound qualities and effortless typing feel, making it a compelling option for anyone who values acoustic performance and smooth actuation. The Keygeek Keylin switch is also inclined towards delivering a premium experience, but details on its sound and feel are less clearly defined. Overall, both switches cater to users looking for smoothness, but the Kang White's distinct acoustic profile sets it apart. If you prioritize sound and a smooth typing experience, the Kang White offers well-defined attributes, while the Keylin promises a high-quality linear feel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Keygeek Keylin linear switch, it’s essential to consider the characteristics that best match your typing style and preferences. If you prefer a slightly heavier switch with a bottom out force of 58 grams, the KTT Kang White is the ideal choice for you. Its low-pitched sound profile provides a pleasing acoustic experience, and its self-lubricating material ensures an incredibly smooth typing feel that can enhance your overall experience, whether you're gaming or typing for long hours. On the other hand, if you favor lighter switches with a bottom out force of 48 grams, you might find the Keylin more appealing. Its premium design offers rich acoustics and an exceptionally smooth action that can make short bursts of typing or gaming feel effortless and enjoyable. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on your personal comfort with the actuation weight and the auditory experience you seek, so consider trying both switches to determine which aligns best with your unique typing needs.
Mentioned in this article
