KTT Kang White vs. Zuoce Lavender
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Zuoce Lavender switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When looking at mechanical keyboard switches, you may come across the KTT Kang White and the Zuoce Lavender, both linear switches offering unique benefits. The Kang White is praised for its poppy linear switch design, providing a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. On the other hand, the Lavender stands out for its exceptional smoothness right out of the box, thanks to its proprietary Ly blend, offering a crisp and clacky sound signature for a satisfying typing experience. While the Kang White is categorized as 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', the Lavender is classified as 'Easy-to-press' and 'Clacky'. Deciding between these two switches may depend on personal preferences and typing style; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
48g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Z1 (Ly blend)
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
21mm double-staged spring
Housing materials
One key difference between the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Zuoce Lavender is the material used for their top housing. The Kang White utilizes polycarbonate for its top housing, which produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. In contrast, the Lavender features a POM top housing, creating a deeper and more muted sound. This contrast in sound profiles can significantly impact the overall typing experience for users, with the Kang White offering a more distinct and resonant sound compared to the softer and more subdued sound of the Lavender.
Another point of comparison between the two switches lies in their bottom housing materials. The Kang White's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition, absorbing more sound and creating a duller and rounder sound. Similarly, the Lavender's POM bottom housing offers a unique and pleasing sound, characterized by its deeper and relatively muted tones. While both switches aim to provide an enjoyable typing experience, the choice between nylon and POM for the bottom housing can greatly affect the overall sound and feel of the switch.
Overall, while the KTT Kang White and the Zuoce Lavender may differ in their choice of housing materials, both switches aim to deliver a satisfying typing experience. The use of polycarbonate in the Kang White's top housing produces a clear and resonant sound, while the POM top housing of the Lavender offers a deeper and more muted sound profile. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Kang White provides a fuller sound, contrasting with the POM bottom housing of the Lavender. Ultimately, users can choose between these switches based on their preference for sound profiles and typing feel, as both options offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Zuoce Lavender linear switch, there are noticeable differences. The Kang White has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Lavender's 48 grams, making it slightly easier to trigger a keystroke. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Kang White requires a heavier 58 grams as opposed to the Lavender's lighter 53 grams. This means that while the Kang White may feel lighter to type on in terms of actuation force, it requires more force to fully press down compared to the Lavender. Both switches fall within the medium range, but the Kang White leans towards the heavier side, while the Lavender is on the lighter end. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on personal preference for typing feel and whether a lighter or heavier touch is preferred.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Zuoce Lavender linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. In this case, the Kang White has a longer travel distance compared to the Lavender. The Kang White's 4 mm travel distance is more traditional, providing a deeper keypress feel, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial keystroke. On the other hand, the Lavender's 3.4 mm travel distance is shallower, making it ideal for gamers or individuals who prioritize faster response times. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the type of typing or gaming experience one is looking for.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Zuoce Lavender has an MSRP of $2.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lavender for $1.99.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Kang White linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral typing experience, providing a bass-heavy and mellow tone that is suitable for a wide range of users and environments. On the other hand, the Zuoce Lavender linear switch delivers a distinctively clacky sound, with each keystroke producing a sharp and snappy noise that adds a satisfying touch to the typing experience. Depending on personal preference and the accompanying keyboard setup, users can choose between the more subdued sound of the Kang White or the lively clack of the Lavender switch.
In terms of feel, the Kang White switch does not have specific descriptors provided, indicating that its feel may not be as distinct or highlighted as the sound profile. On the contrary, the Zuoce Lavender switch is described as easy-to-press, offering a gentle resistance and requiring minimal force to activate. This light actuation force enhances typing comfort and reduces fatigue during extended typing sessions, making it an appealing option for users looking for a responsive and low-impact typing feel.
Overall, both the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Zuoce Lavender linear switch have their unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles. While the Kang White excels in providing a smooth and neutral sound profile, the Lavender stands out with its clacky sound and easy-to-press feel. Depending on whether you prioritize sound, feel, or a balance of both, you can select the switch that best suits your typing needs. Additionally, considering factors such as keycaps, keyboard build, and personal preferences will further enhance your typing experience with either of these switches.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the KTT Kang White linear switch or the Zuoce Lavender linear switch, you should keep in mind the specific qualities of each switch. If you prioritize a low-pitched and neutral sound profile with a medium bottom out force, the Kang White may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you value a clacky sound signature, easy-to-press keys with a medium-light bottom out force, and exceptional smoothness right out of the box, the Zuoce Lavender switch could be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing experience and sound profile.
Mentioned in this article
