KTT Kang White vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 mechanical keyboard switches, one notable difference is their sound profile. The Kang White is praised for its exquisite typing sound, described as dazzling and poppy. Its self-lubricating material also provides an unmatched smoothness while typing, making it a popular choice for those who value a satisfying auditory and tactile experience. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 does not have any particular standout feature in terms of sound. Another distinction between the two switches is their categorization, with the Kang White being classified as low-pitched and neutral, while the Lotus V2 does not fall into any specific category. Both switches have their own unique qualities that may appeal to different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, it is clear that there are some significant differences. The Kang White features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. Additionally, the Kang White's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, whereas the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing also contributes to a deeper and more muted sound profile. These differences in housing materials directly impact the overall sound and feel of each switch.
Despite these differences, the use of polycarbonate in the top housing of the Kang White and POM in the top housing of the Lotus V2 both provide a unique and pleasing sound profile. While the Kang White's polycarbonate top housing results in a sharper and higher-pitched sound, the Lotus V2's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted tone. Both materials contribute to a distinct sound experience, with the choice between the two ultimately depending on personal preference for sound profile.
Ultimately, the choice between the Kang White and the Lotus V2 housing materials comes down to individual preference for sound profile. The Kang White's combination of polycarbonate and nylon creates a sharper, crisper sound, while the Lotus V2's POM housing materials offer a deeper and more muted sound experience. Each switch offers a unique typing experience based on the qualities of their respective housing materials, making them suitable for different preferences in sound profile.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, we can see that they both have the same actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Kang White has a bottom out force of 58 grams, while the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unknown. In terms of weight, the Kang White is slightly heavier due to its higher bottom out force. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lotus V2, while those who enjoy a more substantial push feel may opt for the Kang White. Both switches offer a medium actuation force, making them suitable options for a variety of typing preferences.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. This makes the Lotus V2 the shorter of the two switches in terms of travel distance. The Kang White, on the other hand, offers a slightly longer travel distance. Gamers may prefer the Lotus V2 for its faster response time due to the shorter distance, while others who prefer a more substantial feel when typing may opt for the Kang White with its longer travel distance. Both switches provide different typing experiences based on their travel distances, so choosing between them would depend on personal preference for responsiveness and depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
Overall, when comparing the Kang White and the Lotus V2 linear switches, it is evident that the Kang White excels in sound quality with its low-pitched and neutral tones. The self-lubricating material of the Kang White also provides a smooth typing experience that sets it apart. On the other hand, information regarding the sound and feel of the Lotus V2 switch is currently unavailable. It is important to note that individual preferences play a significant role in choosing the right switch for your mechanical keyboard setup. Depending on your preference for sound and feel, both switches may provide a satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, whether you choose the Kang White or the Lotus V2, you can expect similar results in terms of performance and reliability.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, consider your preference for bottom out force and sound profile. If you prefer a medium bottom out force and enjoy a low-pitched typing sound with a smooth feel, the Kang White may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with no specified bottom out force and want to explore a different sound and feel, the Lotus V2 could be worth considering. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what specific characteristics you prioritize in a keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
