KTT Kang White vs. KTT MoonRosa
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the KTT MoonRosa switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Kang White and the KTT MoonRosa are two popular options to consider. The Kang White is a linear switch known for its dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, thanks to its self-lubricating material. On the other hand, the MoonRosa linear switch, made with an all-POM construction, offers a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature. The Kang White is categorized as 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', while the MoonRosa is categorized as 'Mild', 'Low-pitched', and 'Easy-to-press'. Each switch has its own unique characteristics that make it appealing to different users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the KTT MoonRosa, we see that both switches have a unique sound profile due to their respective top and bottom housings. The Kang White utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound profile with a higher pitch. On the other hand, the MoonRosa features a POM top housing that produces a deeper and more muted sound. While both materials offer distinct sound profiles, they cater to different preferences in terms of sound characteristics.
The contrast between the housing materials continues with the bottom housings of the Kang White and the MoonRosa. The Kang White uses a nylon bottom housing, delivering a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer plastic composition that absorbs more sound. Similarly, the MoonRosa also features a POM bottom housing, maintaining the deep and muted sound profile that complements the POM top housing. Despite the differences in material, both switches aim to provide a unique typing experience with their specific sound profiles.
In summary, the choice of housing materials in switches plays a crucial role in determining the resulting sound profile and typing experience. While the Kang White and the MoonRosa have distinct differences in their top and bottom housing materials, they both aim to enhance the overall typing experience for users. Whether it's the sharper and crisper sound of polycarbonate in the Kang White or the deeper and muted sound of POM in the MoonRosa, each switch offers a unique sound profile that caters to different preferences and typing styles. Ultimately, the housing materials contribute significantly to the overall feel and sound of each switch, providing users with a personalized typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, it is clear that the MoonRosa is the lighter option, with an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. In contrast, the Kang White is the heavier option, with an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams. The Kang White provides a more substantial typing experience due to its higher bottom out force, making it ideal for those who prefer a stronger push feel. On the other hand, the MoonRosa's lighter actuation and bottom out forces make it a great choice for users who prefer a lighter typing experience and need to type for longer periods of time without fatigue. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the typing experience that the user is looking for. If someone is seeking a similar result in terms of force, they may choose either switch as both provide a medium level of force overall.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. The Kang White switch offers a more traditional travel distance, which may appeal to those who prefer a deeper keypress feel. On the other hand, the MoonRosa switch offers a slightly shorter travel distance, which can be advantageous for gamers looking for quicker response times. Both switches provide a smooth linear feel, but the Kang White switch will give a slightly longer keypress overall.Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the desired typing or gaming experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99, whereas the KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the KTT Kang White and the KTT MoonRosa switches are described as having a low-pitched tone. However, the Kang White offers a more neutral sound profile compared to the MoonRosa's buttery smooth and somewhat more mellow sound. The Kang White may provide a slightly more versatile sound for different environments and preferences, while the MoonRosa's sound signature leans towards a more consistent and soothing typing experience. Ultimately, the sound produced by either switch will be affected by the keyboard and keycap setup used.
In terms of feel, the Kang White's characteristics in this aspect are not provided. However, the MoonRosa switch is known for its mild and easy-to-press nature. This means that the MoonRosa offers a gentle typing experience with minimal resistance during key presses, making it suitable for extended typing sessions and reducing finger fatigue. The Kang White's feel remains unknown, but given its linear nature like the MoonRosa, one can expect a similar level of comfort and ease when typing on it.
In conclusion, both the KTT Kang White and the KTT MoonRosa linear switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Kang White excels in providing a neutral sound profile with a self-lubricating material for smooth typing, while the MoonRosa stands out for its buttery smooth feel and easy-to-press characteristics. Depending on personal preferences and typing habits, either switch can provide a satisfying typing experience. Additionally, both switches being low-pitched can offer similar results in terms of sound, ensuring a pleasant auditory experience regardless of the choice made between the two.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a medium bottom out force and a dazzling, self-lubricating typing experience with a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, the KTT Kang White linear switch is the way to go. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force with a buttery smooth typing experience, complemented by a low-pitched sound profile, the KTT MoonRosa linear switch would be the better choice. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities suited for different preferences, so it ultimately comes down to what type of typing experience you are looking for.
Mentioned in this article
