KTT Kang White vs. Haimu Neo White

Overview

When comparing the KTT Kang White and the Haimu Neo White mechanical keyboard switches, it's evident that both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Kang White is celebrated for its poppy linear switch design, which produces a captivating typing sound and boasts unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. On the other hand, the Neo White stands out for its medium weight and slightly reduced total travel, providing a distinctive typing feel. The use of a Ly stem in the Neo White contributes to a remarkably smooth actuation, resulting in a satisfying typing experience. While both switches share a 'Neutral' categorization, they vary in terms of pitch and overall feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

KTT Kang White Linear

Haimu Neo White Linear

$1.99 per 10

$2.70 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The KTT Kang White and the Haimu Neo White both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a relatively stiff plastic, leading to a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the nylon bottom housings of both switches provide a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer nature, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder sound. Despite these differences in materials between the top and bottom housings, both switches offer a balance of sharpness and depth in sound.

In terms of sound production, the differences lie in the impact that each housing material has on the overall sound experience. The KTT Kang White's polycarbonate top housing is responsible for the sound when a key is released, creating a distinct noise profile when typing. Meanwhile, the nylon bottom housing of the Kang White influences the bottom-out sound and feel of pressing down on the switch. Similarly, the Haimu Neo White follows this pattern with its own polycarbonate top and nylon bottom housings. The split qualities between the top and bottom housings offer a unique auditory experience for users of both switches.

While the KTT Kang White and Haimu Neo White share similarities in the materials used for their top and bottom housings, they also have differences in how these materials impact the sound profiles of the switches. Both switches offer a combination of sharper, higher-pitched tones from the polycarbonate top housing and deeper, fuller tones from the nylon bottom housing. This balance allows users to enjoy a unique typing experience that combines the best qualities of both materials. Overall, whether using the Kang White or Neo White, users can expect a satisfying blend of sound characteristics that cater to different preferences in typing sound and feel.

Weight

The actuation force of the KTT Kang White linear switch is 45 grams, while the Haimu Neo White linear switch does not specify its actuation force. Both switches have a bottom out force of 58 grams, making them equally weighted in that regard. The Kang White offers a medium actuation force, providing a balance between typing effort and ease of use. In contrast, the Neo White's actuation force is unknown, making it difficult to compare directly. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Kang White for extended typing or gaming sessions, while others may prefer the Neo White for a potentially heavier typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for actuation force and bottom out force.

Travel distance

The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Haimu Neo White linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that the Kang White has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Neo White. The Kang White's 4 mm travel distance offers a more traditional typing experience, while the Neo White's 3.6 mm travel distance provides a slightly shallower and faster response. Gamers may prefer the Neo White for its shorter travel distance, allowing for quicker key presses. However, those who enjoy a deeper feel when typing may prefer the Kang White. Both switches offer different travel distances that cater to individual preferences, providing a unique typing experience for users.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, both the KTT Kang White and the Haimu Neo White switches are described as having a neutral profile. This means they offer a moderate sound level that is suitable for a wide range of users, whether they are beginners or experienced typists. The Kang White is known for its low-pitched sound, which gives a more bass-heavy and mellow tone, while the Neo White offers a similar neutral tone. Ultimately, the sound of these switches can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard layout and keycaps used.

Moving on to feel, the Kang White switch does not have a specific descriptor provided, while the Haimu Neo White switch is described as offering a mild typing experience. A mild switch typically provides a gentle typing feel that is approachable to most users, falling within a safe middle-ground zone. The Kang White, despite lacking a descriptor, is praised for its self-lubricating material that ensures a smooth and satisfying typing experience. This may indicate that the Kang White switch also offers a comfortable and easy typing feel.

Overall, both the KTT Kang White and the Haimu Neo White linear switches have their unique characteristics that make them stand out. The Kang White switch is known for its dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, while the Neo White switch stands out with its medium weight, reduced total travel, and smooth actuation. If you are looking for a linear switch with a moderate sound profile and a comfortable typing feel, either of these switches would be a great choice to consider. Ultimately, personal preference and typing style will play a significant role in determining which switch is the best fit for you.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Haimu Neo White linear switch, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and how you prioritize certain characteristics in a mechanical keyboard switch. If you prefer a poppy linear switch with dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, the Kang White may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with a medium weight, slightly reduced total travel, and a remarkably smooth actuation, the Neo White switch might be more suitable. Both switches have a bottom out force of 58 grams and offer a neutral sound profile, but the Neo White is described as offering a mild typing experience compared to the Kang White. Consider your typing preferences and prioritize whether sound, feel, or typing experience is most important to you when making your decision between these two switches. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance your typing experience, so choose the one that best aligns with your preferences.

Mentioned in this article

KTT Kang White Linear

$1.99 per 10

Learn more

Haimu Neo White Linear

$2.70 per 10

Learn more