KTT Kang White vs. Jerrzi Salt Ice
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Salt Ice switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Salt Ice mechanical keyboard switches, we encounter two unique linear switches with distinguishing features. The Kang White offers a delightful typing experience with its smooth self-lubricating material that provides unparalleled smoothness and a dazzling typing sound. On the other hand, the Salt Ice switches stand out with their bright, clacky characteristics and light touch, making them ideal for users seeking an energetic and responsive typing experience. While the Kang White is categorized as 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', the Salt Ice's category remains unspecified. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
Comparing the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Salt Ice, both keyboards feature a polycarbonate top housing which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the relatively stiffer nature of polycarbonate, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially useful for RGB lighting. However, the Kang White has a nylon bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Salt Ice's polycarbonate bottom housing, which contributes to a sharper and higher-pitched sound.
In terms of aesthetics, both keyboards feature clear housings indicative of polycarbonate material. This allows for a visually appealing design, especially when paired with RGB lighting. However, the KTT Kang White's nylon bottom housing provides a different typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Jerrzi Salt Ice's polycarbonate bottom housing, which absorbs less sound and creates a crisper tone. While the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key, the bottom housing has a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch.
Overall, the choice of housing materials in the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Salt Ice offers different sound profiles and typing experiences. While both keyboards utilize polycarbonate for the top housing, creating a sharper and crisper sound, the difference lies in the bottom housing material. The Kang White's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, while the Salt Ice's polycarbonate bottom housing contributes to a sharper and higher-pitched tone. Depending on personal preference for sound and typing feel, users can choose between the two keyboards to suit their individual needs.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Kang White linear switch to the Jerrzi Salt Ice linear switch, both switches have the same actuation force of 45 grams. The Kang White has a bottom out force of 58 grams, providing a slightly heavier typing experience compared to the Salt Ice, whose bottom out force is unknown. In terms of weight, the Kang White is the heavier option between the two. Some users may prefer the Kang White for its slightly heavier feel, which can provide a more substantial typing experience. However, those who prefer a lighter typing experience may find the Salt Ice to be more suitable. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Jerrzi Salt Ice linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The Kang White has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Salt Ice, making it the longer option of the two. The Salt Ice, on the other hand, offers a slightly shorter travel distance. The difference may not seem significant, but for some users, even a fractional variance can make a difference in their typing or gaming experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for travel distance. If you prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker response times, the Salt Ice may be the better option. However, if you prefer a bit more depth in your keystrokes, the Kang White could be the preferred choice. Both switches offer their own advantages, and it ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Salt Ice has an MSRP of $2.79 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Salt Ice for $2.30.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Kang White linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral typing experience, providing a calming and consistent sound profile that is suitable for various environments. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Salt Ice linear switch is known for its bright and clacky typing sound, giving users a more vibrant and energetic feedback while typing. Depending on personal preference and the setup of the keyboard, users can choose between the mellow tones of the Kang White or the lively sound of the Salt Ice switch.
In terms of feel, the specific qualities of the Kang White and Salt Ice switches are not currently available for comparison. However, based on the general characteristics of linear switches, both switches are likely to offer smooth and consistent keystrokes without the tactile bump found in tactile switches. Users can expect a fluid typing experience with linear switches, whether they choose the Kang White or the Salt Ice option.
In conclusion, the KTT Kang White linear switch and Jerrzi Salt Ice linear switch each offer unique qualities in terms of sound and potentially feel. While the Kang White provides a low-pitched and neutral typing sound for a calming experience, the Salt Ice switch offers a bright and clacky sound for a more energetic feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on personal preference and the desired typing experience, but users can expect reliable and smooth performance with either option.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Salt Ice linear switch, consider the following factors. Choose the Kang White if you prefer a medium bottom out force, a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, and a smooth typing experience with its self-lubricating material. On the other hand, opt for the Salt Ice if you enjoy a switch with an unknown bottom out force, bright and clacky characteristics, and a light touch for vibrant feedback and effortless actuation. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing sound, feel, and overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
