United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Kang White vs. Jerrzi Seashell

An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Seashell switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Seashell, both linear switches. The Kang White is renowned for its poppy linear typing sound and unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. Categorized as 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', it offers a unique typing experience for those who prefer a more subtle sound and feel. On the other hand, the Seashell switches stand out with their stunning purple hue and combination of aesthetic beauty and functionality. Categorized as 'Clacky', 'Feathery', 'Easy-to-press', 'High-pitched', and 'Polished', they provide a light and clacky typing experience that remains comfortable even during long typing sessions. Choosing between these switches ultimately depends on your specific preferences and typing style; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

58g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

1.20 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Seashell are quite similar in terms of their polycarbonate top housing. Both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The translucency of polycarbonate also makes it especially useful for switches that plan to use RGB lighting. This means that users can expect a similar sound experience and aesthetic appeal from both the Kang White and the Seashell when it comes to their top housing material.

However, when it comes to the bottom housing material, the Kang White features a nylon bottom housing while the Seashell also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile, as it absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics. This results in a duller and rounder sound when typing on switches that use nylon for their bottom housing. Therefore, users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of sound and feel from both switches due to their shared use of nylon for the bottom housing material.

Overall, the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Jerrzi Seashell play a significant role in shaping the sound profile and typing experience of the switches. While both switches use polycarbonate for their top housing, providing a sharp and crisp sound, they also share nylon as the material for their bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This means that users can expect a consistent typing experience in terms of sound and feel from both switches, with the top and bottom housing materials each contributing their unique qualities to the overall performance of the switches.

Weight

The KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch both have an actuation force of 45 grams, providing a light and responsive typing experience for users. However, the KTT Kang White has a heavier bottom out force of 58 grams, giving a slightly more substantial feel when fully pressing down on the keys. In contrast, the bottom out force of the Jerrzi Seashell is unknown. This means that while both switches offer a similar actuation force, the Kang White will result in a firmer typing experience overall. For those who prefer a lighter touch, the Jerrzi Seashell may be the preferred option, while the Kang White may be better suited for those who prefer a bit more resistance in their keystrokes.

Travel distance

The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, making it the longer of the two switches compared to the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch, which has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The Kang White offers a more traditional travel distance, while the Seashell provides a slightly shallower feel. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Seashell for quicker response times, while those seeking a more substantial key press may opt for the Kang White. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of key feel and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Jerrzi Seashell has an MSRP of $2.79 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Seashell for $2.30.

The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Kang White linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral typing experience, providing a smooth and mellow tone that is suitable for a wide range of users. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch is known for its clacky high-pitched sound, giving off a sharp and percussive key press that is crisp and bright. Depending on personal preference, individuals may lean towards the soothing sound of the Kang White or the more distinct and lively sound of the Seashell.

Moving on to feel, the Kang White switch details are not provided, so it's difficult to make a direct comparison in this aspect. However, the Jerrzi Seashell switch is described as feathery, easy-to-press, and polished. This means that the Seashell switch offers a light actuation force, making typing effortless and comfortable, reducing finger fatigue during extended use. Additionally, the polished finish ensures smooth key travel, enhancing the overall typing experience. For those who prioritize a light and refined feel while typing, the Seashell switch may be the preferred choice.

Overall, both the Kang White and Jerrzi Seashell linear switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The Kang White excels in its low-pitched typing sound and self-lubricating material for a smooth typing experience, while the Jerrzi Seashell stands out with its vibrant aesthetic, clacky high-pitched sound, and comfortable feathery feel. Depending on whether one values sound, feel, or both in a mechanical keyboard switch, users can choose between the Kang White for a soothing typing experience or the Jerrzi Seashell for a more lively and comfortable typing sensation. Ultimately, both switches provide enjoyable typing experiences for keyboard enthusiasts.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jerrzi Seashell linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prefer a medium bottom out force of 58 grams, a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, and a smooth typing experience with self-lubricating properties, the Kang White switch would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you are drawn to the stunning purple hue, light and clacky feel, and feathery and easy-to-press nature of the Seashell switches, along with a high-pitched and clacky sound profile, then the Jerrzi Seashell switch would be more suitable for your preferences. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles, so choose based on what aligns best with your typing experience and aesthetic preferences.

Mentioned in this article