KTT Kang White vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options that offer unique features and experiences are the KTT Kang White and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring. The Kang White is a linear switch, renowned for its exquisite representation of a poppy linear switch and its dazzling typing sound. The self-lubricating material of the Kang White provides an unparalleled smoothness when typing. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring is a tactile switch that offers a medium level of tactility. It is highly recommended for those seeking a tactile switch with a lower actuation and bottom-out force. The approachable tactility combined with a deep and thocky sound profile sets the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring apart. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
48g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring share similarities in their polycarbonate top housing. Both switches utilize polycarbonate as the material for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate contributes to a more clear and resonant sound, making it an ideal choice for users who prioritize sound quality. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate allows for compatibility with RGB lighting, making it visually appealing for those who enjoy customizable lighting effects. Therefore, users can expect similar sound and lighting experiences from both switches.
However, a notable contrast arises when comparing the bottom housings of these switches. The Kang White features a nylon bottom housing, while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring utilizes a polycarbonate bottom housing. Nylon is known for eliciting a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature, absorbing more sound than harder plastics. This creates a duller and rounder sound, bringing a distinct typing experience unique to the Kang White switch. On the other hand, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring contributes to a sharper and more resonant sound profile, in line with its overall design. The difference in bottom housing materials results in contrasting sound profiles and sensations when bottoming out on the switches.
When pressed, the bottom housing material plays a significant role in influencing the bottom-out sound and feel of a switch. Users will experience the qualities of the bottom housing material when they apply pressure and press down on the switch. The choice of nylon in the Kang White's bottom housing contributes to a deeper, fuller, and potentially quieter typing experience, as the material absorbs more sound. Conversely, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring delivers a crisper and potentially louder bottom-out sound, owing to its stiffer nature. Conversely, the sound experienced when releasing a key, or when the key returns to its original position, is influenced more by the top housing material.
In conclusion, while both the KTT Kang White and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring share the use of polycarbonate in their top housings, offering similar sound profiles and compatibility with RGB lighting, they differ significantly in their bottom housing materials. The Kang White's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring's polycarbonate bottom housing creates a sharper and more resonant sound. The choice of bottom housing material greatly influences the typing experience, with the bottom-out sound and feel being impacted by the qualities of the material. Ultimately, users can select the switch that aligns with their sound preferences, as well as the visual aesthetics they desire.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, it becomes evident that they both fall within the medium force range. The Kang White requires an actuation force of 45 grams, while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring requires a slightly higher actuation force of 48 grams. This means that the latter switch might provide a slightly firmer typing experience.
In terms of bottom out force, the Kang White requires 58 grams of force to fully press the key down, whereas the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring requires a lighter force of 55 grams. Therefore, the Kang White offers a slightly heavier bottoming out sensation compared to the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring.
Considering the weight aspect, some users may favor a lighter switch to enable longer typing sessions, especially for work or extended gaming sessions. In this regard, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring with its lighter actuation force may be more suitable. However, for those who prefer a more substantial typing experience and enjoy a stronger push feel, the Kang White's slightly higher actuation force could be the preferred choice.
Ultimately, both switches provide similar results in terms of actuation and bottom out forces, falling within the medium force range. The differences lie in the specific weights, with the Kang White being slightly heavier and the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring being slightly lighter. Users should consider their personal preferences and typing style when deciding between these two options.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key with either switch, you will feel the same distance traveled from the top to the bottom. Therefore, both switches will provide similar results in terms of travel distance. Whether you choose the Kang White or the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, you can expect a consistent and satisfying tactile experience as the key is pressed down.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring for $3.57.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Kang White linear switch is well-regarded for its dazzling typing sound, emitting a low-pitched profile. This characteristic provides a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. With its self-lubricating material, the Kang White switch offers an unparalleled smoothness during typing. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch is highly recommended for those seeking a medium level of tactility. It features a deep and thocky sound profile, which enhances the overall typing experience. The feel of the Kang White switch is unknown, while the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is described as providing a bouncy sensation. This bouncy feel gives the keys a spring-like or elastic feedback, offering a lively and responsive experience.
To conclude, while the Kang White and Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches have distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel, they both offer unique advantages. The Kang White switch stands out for its poppy linear sound and unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. Meanwhile, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch provides a deep and thocky sound profile, along with a bouncy feel that gives a lively feedback when pressed. Depending on individual preferences, both switches offer satisfying typing experiences, ensuring that users will achieve their desired results. Whether you prefer the low-pitched and smooth vibrancy of the Kang White or the deep and bouncy nature of the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, both switches deliver remarkable performance.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a poppy linear switch with a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness, the KTT Kang White is your best choice. With a medium bottom out force of 58 grams, it offers a balanced and comfortable typing experience. Additionally, its low-pitched and neutral sound profile makes it suitable for both beginners and advanced users, whether you plan to use it at home or work.
On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a medium level of tactility, the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring is highly recommended. With a slightly lighter bottom out force of 55 grams, it provides an approachable tactility and a deep, thocky sound profile. This switch also features a bouncy feel, giving you a lively and rebounding sensation when typing.
Ultimately, the choice between these two switches depends on your personal preferences. If you value smoothness and a linear typing experience, go with the Kang White. If you prefer a tactile switch with a bouncy feel and a thocky sound, opt for the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring. Both switches offer unique characteristics that can enhance your typing experience based on your individual needs. In the end, it's all about finding the switch that suits your preferences and typing style the best.
Mentioned in this article
