KTT Kang White vs. Jwick Taro
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Jwick Taro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options that often come up in discussions are the KTT Kang White and the Jwick Taro. The Kang White is a linear switch, known for its exquisite representation of a poppy linear switch and its dazzling typing sound. One of its standout features is the self-lubricating material, which provides an unparalleled smoothness when typing on them. On the other hand, the Taro is a tactile switch, known for its comfy subdued color scheme and cozy typing experience. Users can expect a snappy, medium-level of tactility while hearing acute and crisp clacks. The Kang White falls under the categories of 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', while the Taro is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Buttery', and 'Stepped'. Both switches have their own unique qualities, making them desirable options in their respective categories. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can make the best decision on your preferred switch.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The KTT Kang White and the Jwick Taro both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a relatively stiffer plastic, leading to a clearer and more resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially beneficial for those planning to use RGB lighting, as it allows for a stunning visual effect. Therefore, both switches offer similar results with regard to their top housing material, resulting in comparable sound profiles and visual aesthetics.
On the other hand, the Kang White and the Taro differ in their bottom housing material, with the Kang White utilizing a nylon bottom housing while the Taro also incorporates nylon for this component. Nylon is considered a classic switch housing material that produces a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing. This is because nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Therefore, while both switches feature nylon bottom housings, the specific design and construction of these housings may vary, potentially influencing the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch.
When comparing the impact of the top and bottom housings on the overall sound profile, it is important to consider the functional aspects of these components. The bottom housing of a switch plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing is more influential when releasing a key. Therefore, the choice of housing materials for each switch will have a noticeable effect on the auditory experience and tactile feedback during typing. However, since both the Kang White and the Taro feature polycarbonate top housings, users can expect similar results in terms of the release sound and experience between the two switches. Furthermore, the use of nylon in the bottom housing of both switches ensures a deeper and fuller sound profile, although the specific design and characteristics may differ between the Kang White and the Taro.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, there are noticeable differences. The actuation force of the Kang White is 45 grams, while the Taro's actuation force is unknown, making it difficult to directly compare. However, both switches have a medium bottom out force, with the Kang White at 58 grams and the Taro slightly heavier at 67 grams, making it medium-heavy.
Considering weight, those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Kang White switch. This allows for longer periods of comfortable typing, which is ideal for those who use their keyboards extensively for work or gaming. On the other hand, individuals who enjoy a stronger push feel and desire a more substantial typing experience may opt for the Taro switch with its heavier bottom out force. This increased force provides a satisfying tactile feedback while typing.
Although the actuation force for the Taro switch is not specified, if it happens to be similar to the Kang White at 45 grams, users can expect similar results in terms of the force required to trigger a keystroke. However, it is essential to note that the bottom out force of the Taro is higher, indicating a more weighted and pronounced keystroke.
Ultimately, the choice between the Kang White and Taro switches depends on personal preference. Those seeking a lighter typing experience may favor the Kang White, while those desiring a more forceful and tactile feedback may be drawn to the heavier bottom out force of the Taro switch.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, it is evident that they both provide a similar experience. The Kang White has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Taro has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.7 mm. Both of these distances fall within the traditional range, with 4 mm being the standard and 3.7 mm being slightly shallower. The choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preference and intended use. Gamers may lean towards the Taro switch with its shorter travel distance, as it allows for faster response times. On the other hand, those who prefer a more substantial feel may opt for the Kang White switch with its slightly longer travel distance. It is important to consider the desired level of responsiveness and depth when making a decision between these two switches.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jwick Taro has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taro for $4.25.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The KTT Kang White linear switch is known for its dazzling typing sound, which is low-pitched and features a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. The sound profile of the Kang White is described as neutral, meaning it has a moderate actuation force requirement and a moderate sound profile suitable for most usage scenarios. The self-lubricating material of the Kang White switch also provides an unparalleled smoothness when typing on them. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro tactile switch offers a cozy typing experience with a snappy, medium-level of tactility. The sound of the Taro switch is also described as neutral, similar to the Kang White switch. The Taro switch produces acute and crisp clacks, providing a pleasant auditory experience. When it comes to feel, the Kang White switch does not provide specific information. However, the Taro switch is described as buttery, implying a smooth and fluid keystroke experience with a seamless, effortless, and uniform typing sensation. The Taro switch is also said to be stepped, meaning it offers a mild tactile feedback with some pre-travel and/or post-travel sensation.
In conclusion, both the Kang White and the Taro switches offer unique subjective qualities that differentiate them in terms of sound and feel. The Kang White switch provides a low-pitched sound, while the Taro switch produces acute and crisp clacks. Both switches have a neutral sound profile, suitable for a wide range of usage scenarios. The Kang White switch offers unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. When it comes to feel, the Taro switch provides a buttery typing experience with a smooth and fluid keystroke, as well as a mild tactile feedback characterized by its stepped sensation. Overall, both switches offer their own distinctive characteristics, giving users the choice to select the one that aligns with their personal preferences.
Conclusion
In conclusion, if you are looking for a linear switch with a medium bottom out force and a dazzling typing sound, the KTT Kang White switch would be an excellent choice for you. Its self-lubricating material ensures an unparalleled smoothness in your typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a tactile switch with a medium-heavy bottom-out force and a cozy typing experience, the Jwick Taro switch would be the better option. The Taro switch offers a snappy and medium-level of tactility with acute and crisp clacks. Both switches have a neutral sound profile, making them suitable for most intents and purposes. However, if you value a buttery and seamless typing sensation, the Taro switch would be the more suitable choice. Ultimately, the decision between the KTT Kang White and Jwick Taro switches depends on your preference for the typing sound and feel.
Mentioned in this article
