KTT Laurel vs. Huano Matcha Latte V2

Overview

When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Laurel and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 both present compelling options for users seeking a linear experience, yet they cater to distinct preferences and typing styles. The KTT Laurel shines with its medium-light resistance, making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize a snappy feedback with a subtly low-pitched sound profile, thanks to its full POM housing and short travel. This switch excels in providing a responsive feel, seamlessly blending comfort with performance. On the other hand, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 entices typists with its smooth, creamy linear typing experience that strikes a delightful balance between lightness and a satisfying bottom-out feel. Enhanced with factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble, the Matcha Latte V2 offers premium performance at an attractive price point, appealing to both beginners and seasoned enthusiasts alike. While both switches bring unique traits to the table, the choice ultimately hinges on the specific typing experience one seeks. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

KTT Laurel Linear

Huano Matcha Latte V2 Linear

$4.42

$3.95 per 10

$3.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When examining the housing materials of the KTT Laurel and the Huano Matcha Latte V2, it's clear that while both switches utilize plastics known for their sound and performance characteristics, they use different materials that lend distinct qualities to each. The KTT Laurel employs POM (Polyoxymethylene) in both its top and bottom housings, which is known for creating a deep, muted sound profile that is generally appreciated for its pleasing acoustic qualities. This unintrusive sound can enhance typing experiences by providing a softer auditory feedback. In contrast, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 incorporates a POK (Polyketone) material for its top housing and nylon for its bottom housing. The POK material is characterized by its smoothness and durability, featuring a unique clacky sound profile that diverges from the more muted sound of the Laurel's POM.

Highlighting the differences in materials further, the Matcha Latte V2's bottom housing is crafted from nylon, a classic material that adds to a deeper and rounder sound due to its more absorbent nature. This softer texture allows nylon to absorb more sound waves compared to the harder POM plastic used in the Laurel. Consequently, users might experience a different auditory feedback and tactile sensation when bottoming out the switch. The combination of the POK top and nylon bottom in the Matcha Latte creates a switch profile where the qualities of each material manifest distinctly, contributing to what can be characterized as a more layered auditory experience, as sound absorption and resonance are split between the softer nylon bottom and the clacky POK top.

Despite their material differences, both the KTT Laurel and Huano Matcha Latte V2 can yield satisfying typing experiences, albeit with variances distinct to each switch's design. The POM materials in the Laurel promote seamless performance with a more muted sound signature, while the POK and nylon combination in the Matcha Latte enhances both smoothness and durability, complementing the sound profile with a unique blend of clackiness and depth. Those seeking a richer sound may be attracted to the Matcha Latte, whereas individuals desiring a subtle, deeper sound might favor the Laurel. Ultimately, those familiar with the nuances of switch materials will appreciate how distinct sound and tactile preferences can be achieved depending on the specific plastic used in a switch's housing.

Weight

When comparing the KTT Laurel linear switch and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch, we find some notable differences in their actuation forces. The Laurel features a lighter actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Matcha Latte V2's actuation force of 45 grams, making the Laurel the easier switch to press, which can be beneficial for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. The bottom out force for the Laurel is 50 grams, providing a firmer feedback when fully depressed. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 has an unknown bottom out force, leaving its total travel feel somewhat ambiguous. This uncertainty can affect the typing experience, as users might not have a complete understanding of the switch's responsiveness at full depression. Overall, those who favor lighter switches may prefer the KTT Laurel for its easier actuation and more defined bottoming out feel, while others who enjoy a bit more resistance might lean toward the Matcha Latte V2 despite the lack of information on its bottom out characteristics.

Travel distance

The KTT Laurel linear switch features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that if you're looking for a more responsive experience, the KTT Laurel may be the better choice due to its shorter travel distance, which can enhance quick key presses often favored by gamers. On the other hand, the Huano Matcha Latte V2's 3.6 mm travel distance offers a bit more depth, which some users may find preferable for a more substantial feel. Ultimately, the difference is minimal, but those who prefer a snappier response might lean toward the Laurel, whereas those seeking a more deliberate press might appreciate the Matcha Latte V2’s marginally longer distance.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Laurel switch boasts a low-pitched sound profile, which means it produces a bass-heavy and mellow tone that is generally quieter and less intrusive than higher-pitched switches. This subtle auditory characteristic can enhance the typing experience, making it feel more comfortable in quieter environments. On the other hand, while the sound profile of the Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches isn't explicitly described, it's essential to note that the overall auditory experience can vary significantly based on the keyboard build, including factors like the type of board and keycaps. Therefore, while the Laurel's sound is characterized, one could expect that the Matcha Latte V2 might also deliver a relatively smooth auditory experience, albeit without a clear indication of its specific tonal quality.

In terms of feel, the KTT Laurel switch is recognized for its snappy responsiveness. This quality is often attributed to its longer or dual-staged springs that contribute to a lively and engaging typing experience, making each keystroke feel reactive and quick. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 switches present a unique blend of bouncy and creamy attributes. The bouncy feel delivers a spring-like feedback sensation, providing a lively rebound with each key press. Complementing this, the creamy aspect of the switches ensures a smooth and buttery typing experience, likely aided by their factory lubrication. Therefore, while both switches may offer satisfying tactile experiences, the Laurel emphasizes snappiness, while the Matcha Latte V2 excels in providing a smooth and responsive feel.

In summary, both the KTT Laurel and Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switches cater to different preferences in sound and feel. The Laurel's low-pitched sound and snappy responsiveness make it a solid choice for users who seek a more muted typing experience with a quick, lively feedback. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 offers a unique combination of bounciness and smoothness, making it ideal for those who appreciate a creamy typing sensation alongside a solid bottom-out feel. While they may cater to slightly different preferences, both switches are designed to offer high-quality performance, ensuring a satisfying typing experience for newcomers venturing into the world of mechanical keyboards.

Conclusion

To sum up, your choice between the KTT Laurel and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switches ultimately depends on your typing preferences and habits. If you’re looking for a switch that feels snappy, with a medium-light actuation force of 50 grams, the KTT Laurel might be the better option for you. Its low-pitched sound profile adds to a more subtle acoustic experience, making it perfect for environments where noise could be an issue. This switch excels in offering a responsive typing experience, making it suitable for those who value quick keystrokes in gaming or fast-paced typing scenarios. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, more elastic feel with just the right balance of lightness and feedback, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 could be your go-to. With its creamy typing experience bolstered by factory lubrication, this switch provides a delightful sensation akin to gliding your fingers across the keys. The Matcha Latte V2 is ideal for users who appreciate a bouncy feedback during long typing sessions, offering a premium feel without breaking the bank. In the end, consider how each switch's characteristics align with your personal typing style to make the best choice for your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article

KTT Laurel Linear

$4.42

$3.95 per 10

Learn more

Huano Matcha Latte V2 Linear

$3.99 per 10

Learn more