Gazzew LT vs. Outemu Lotus
An in-depth look at the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gazzew LT linear switch to the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is clear that each switch offers unique advantages. The Gazzew LT stands out for its appealing lilac hue and the satisfying deep, resonant thockiness it provides during typing. These switches also offer a seamless glide with each keystroke, making typing a smooth and pleasant experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus switch does not have any specific standout features mentioned but it offers a different typing experience. While the LT is described as bassy, thocky, low-pitched, the Lotus does not have any specific categorizations. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.20 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel Korean spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Lotus both aim to deliver a rich and deep sound profile through their respective proprietary blends. The Gazzew LT features a Gazzew blend top housing, sometimes referred to as "boba plastic," known for its softness which contributes to a pleasing sound profile. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus utilizes a nylon top housing, a classic switch material that also provides a deep and full sound profile due to its relatively softer nature. While they differ in material composition, both housing options are designed to enhance the typing experience by creating a more enjoyable sound profile.
In terms of the bottom housing, both the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Lotus continue to prioritize sound quality with their respective proprietary blends. The Gazzew blend bottom housing of the LT shares similarities with its top housing, providing a rich and deep sound profile that complements the overall typing experience. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Outemu Lotus absorbs sound effectively, resulting in a duller and rounder sound that enhances the tactile feel of the switch. Despite the differences in material, both bottom housings aim to deliver a satisfying typing experience through improved sound quality.
When considering the impact of the top and bottom housings on the overall typing experience, it is essential to recognize how each material contributes to the switch's sound profile and feel. The qualities of the bottom housing, such as impact on bottom-out sound and feel, play a significant role when pressing down on the switch. In contrast, the top housing's impact is more prominent when letting go of a key, influencing the sound at that moment. While the Gazzew LT and the Outemu Lotus differ in their housing materials, both switches strive to deliver an enhanced typing experience through optimized sound profiles and tactile feedback for users to enjoy.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is evident that the LT has a bottom out force of 65 grams, making it medium-heavy, while the Lotus has a bottom out force of 50 grams, which is lighter in comparison. The actuation force of the LT is unknown, whereas the Lotus has an actuation force of 35 grams. The difference in weight can significantly impact the typing experience for users. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Lotus switch, as it allows for longer typing periods without fatigue. On the other hand, individuals seeking a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the LT switch for its heavier bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The Gazzew LT linear switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm, while the Outemu Lotus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, which are popular among gamers for their faster response times. However, the slight difference in travel distance between the two switches may not be noticeable to the average user. If you prefer a more responsive feel, the Gazzew LT may be the better option due to its slightly shorter travel distance. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly deeper press, the Outemu Lotus with its slightly longer travel distance may be more suitable. Ultimately, both switches offer similar results in terms of travel distance, and the choice between the two may come down to personal preference in terms of feel and response.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50, whereas the Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gazzew LT linear switch stands out for its deep, bassy, and thocky sound profile. Typing on these switches can be compared to creating a symphony of satisfying thocks with every keystroke, offering a rich audial experience that resonates with users. On the other hand, information about the sound profile of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is not available at this time. It is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by various factors such as the keyboard's construction and the type of keycaps used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, details about the tactile experience of the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch are not provided. Therefore, it is difficult to make a direct comparison in terms of how each switch feels to type on. Differences in the actuation force, smoothness, and overall typing experience can greatly impact a user's preference for a particular switch.
Taking into consideration the available information on sound and the lack of details on feel for the Outemu Lotus switch, it can be concluded that in terms of auditory experience, the Gazzew LT linear switch is favored for its deep and satisfying thockiness. However, without a description of the sound profile of the Lotus switch and no information on the feel of either switch, it is challenging to make a definitive comparison between the two. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on personal preference and the individual's typing preferences. It is recommended to try out both switches to determine which one aligns best with your typing style and preferences.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when deciding between the Gazzew LT linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, consider your preferences for bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force of 65 grams and enjoy a deep, resonant "thocky" sound profile with each keystroke, the Gazzew LT switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force of 50 grams and are not particular about the sound and feel of the switch, the Outemu Lotus switch could be a suitable option. Ultimately, the decision will depend on your personal preferences and typing style.
Mentioned in this article
