United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Mannan Pipefish vs. Gateron Type L

An in-depth look at the KTT Mannan Pipefish and the Gateron Type L switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing between the KTT Mannan Pipefish and the Gateron Type L mechanical keyboard switches, both options have their own unique advantages. The Mannan Pipefish is praised for its smooth linear action and light 45g actuation and bottom-out force, providing a comfortable typing experience ideal for casual typists. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L is highlighted for its lightness and distinct sound signature that leans towards the deeper end of the acoustic spectrum. Both switches fall under the category of 'Easy-to-press' and 'Neutral,' making them suitable for a wide range of users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

37g

Actuation force

38g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm spring

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

Comparing the housing materials of the KTT Mannan Pipefish and the Gateron Type L, we can see that they both use nylon for the bottom housing. This means that both switches will elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon, which absorbs more sound than harder plastics, creating a duller and rounder sound. However, the Mannan Pipefish utilizes polycarbonate for the top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic, leading to a more clear and resonant sound. On the other hand, the Type L opts for a nylon top housing, which will also contribute to a deeper and fuller sound profile similar to the bottom housing.

In terms of aesthetics, the Mannan Pipefish's polycarbonate top housing allows for RGB lighting to shine through due to its translucency. This makes it an ideal choice for those looking to add visual flair to their keyboard setup. In contrast, the Type L's nylon top housing does not offer the same level of transparency, making it more suitable for users who prefer a more traditional appearance. Both switches feature nylon bottom housings, which provide a consistent typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound profile.

When considering the overall impact of the housing materials on the typing experience, it is clear that the choice between polycarbonate and nylon can significantly affect the sound and feel of a switch. The split between top and bottom housings means that each material brings its own unique qualities to the overall sound profile. The bottom housing will have a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing will influence the sound when releasing a key. Ultimately, users can choose between a sharper, crisper sound profile with polycarbonate or a deeper, fuller sound profile with nylon based on their personal preferences.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, both switches have a relatively light actuation force and bottom out force. The Mannan Pipefish has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the Type L has an actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. Both switches provide a light typing experience, making them suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions. The slight difference in actuation force between the two switches is minimal and may not be noticeable in practical use. Overall, whether choosing the Mannan Pipefish or the Type L, users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch both have a travel distance of 4 mm, making them equal in this aspect. The travel distance of a switch is the distance it travels from the top to the bottom, which is the distance you feel when pressing down on a key. Both switches provide a consistent travel distance, ensuring a smooth typing experience. With their equal travel distances, users can expect similar results in terms of key feel and actuation. In conclusion, both the Mannan Pipefish and Type L switches offer the same travel distance, making them equally suitable for individuals who prefer a shorter, more responsive keystroke.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Mannan Pipefish has an MSRP of $3.53 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mannan Pipefish for $3.05.

The Gateron Type L comes in at $4.70 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, both the KTT Mannan Pipefish and the Gateron Type L switches are described as having a neutral sound profile, making them suitable for various purposes and environments. However, the Type L switch also offers a subdued sound signature, providing a more dampened and subtle typing experience compared to the Mannan Pipefish. Ultimately, the sound produced by a switch is also influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.

When it comes to feel, the Mannan Pipefish is characterized by an easy-to-press action, requiring minimal force for activation, resulting in a comfortable and effortless typing experience. Additionally, it boasts a polished finish that enhances smooth key travel. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L switch is described as feathery, providing an exceptionally light keypress and reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. It also falls under the category of easy-to-press switches, offering low-impact and responsive typing feel similar to the Mannan Pipefish.

Considering the available information, both the Mannan Pipefish and Gateron Type L switches offer a comfortable typing experience with their low actuation forces and smooth linear actions. While the Mannan Pipefish has a polished finish for enhanced smoothness, the Type L switch stands out with its feathery feel and subdued sound signature. Ultimately, both switches cater to individuals seeking a strain-free and enjoyable typing journey, with slight variations in sound and feel that may cater to different preferences.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when considering the choice between the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your preferences and typing needs. If you value a smooth and precise typing experience with a comfortable actuation force and bottom-out force, the Mannan Pipefish switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a light and feathery typing feel with a subdued sound profile, the Gateron Type L switch could be the better option. Both switches offer a delightful and strain-free typing experience, so it ultimately depends on your personal typing style and preferences. Whether you are a casual typist looking for effortless typing or a seasoned typist seeking a light and gentle typing experience, both switches have something unique to offer. Consider your typing preferences and needs carefully when making your decision.

Mentioned in this article