Cherry MX Red vs. Wuque Studio WS Jade
An in-depth look at the Cherry MX Red and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the Cherry MX Red and the Wuque Studio WS Jade both offer unique features and benefits to consider. The MX Red is a classic Cherry switch known for its slightly heftier feel and deeper sound profile, providing a robust typing experience that combines responsiveness with a satisfying auditory depth. On the other hand, the WS Jade sets itself apart with a metallic insert in its stem base, creating a bright and resonant sound profile along with a captivating RGB display. The typing experience with the WS Jade is described as uniquely creamy and smooth, with a rock-solid bottom-out sensation. Both switches have their own strengths and characteristics that may appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
18mm double-stage spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Cherry MX Red and the Wuque Studio WS Jade, both switches use different materials for both the top and bottom housing. The MX Red features a nylon top and bottom housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer plastic absorbing more sound. In contrast, the WS Jade utilizes a POM top and bottom housing, creating a pleasing and unique sound that is deeper and more muted compared to the MX Red. Despite the differences in material, both switches aim to provide a distinct typing experience with their respective housing materials.
While the MX Red and WS Jade share a similar goal of enhancing the typing experience through their housing materials, the specific characteristics of each material create unique differences in sound and feel. The nylon housing of the MX Red produces a duller and rounder sound profile, emphasizing a softer typing experience with a deeper sound. On the other hand, the POM housing of the WS Jade delivers a sound that is deeper and more muted, contributing to a distinct typing feel that is designed to be pleasing and unique. These differences showcase how the choice of housing material can significantly impact the overall typing experience for users.
In terms of typing sensation, the housing materials of both the Cherry MX Red and the Wuque Studio WS Jade play a crucial role in determining the overall sound and feel of the switch. With the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, users can expect a noticeable impact on their typing experience based on the material used. Additionally, the top housing will have a significant impact on the sound when releasing a key, further showcasing the importance of housing material in creating a satisfying typing experience. Whether it is the nylon of the MX Red or the POM of the WS Jade, the housing materials are essential components that contribute to the overall quality of each switch.
Weight
In comparing the Cherry MX Red linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, the MX Red has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams compared to the WS Jade's 50 grams. The MX Red does not have a specified bottom out force, while the WS Jade has a bottom out force of 60 grams. The difference in weight between the two switches can impact the typing experience significantly. Lighter switches like the MX Red are favored by those who prefer less resistance for extended typing or gaming sessions. On the other hand, the heavier actuation force of the WS Jade provides a more substantial typing experience for users who prefer a stronger push feel while typing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preference for actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Cherry MX Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is considered a more traditional depth. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. Gamers who prefer faster response times may lean towards the WS Jade switch due to its shorter travel distance. However, for those who enjoy a more pronounced key press, the Cherry MX Red switch with its longer travel distance may be more appealing. Both switches offer a different feel when typing or gaming, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Cherry MX Red has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Red for $4.00.
The Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Cherry MX Red linear switch is known for its thocky and low-pitched profile, offering a deep and satisfying sound when pressed. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch is described as clacky, marbly, and resonant, providing a sharp, bright, and higher-pitched sound experience. Depending on personal preference and the setup of your keyboard, the MX Red may offer a deeper and mellower tone, while the WS Jade may present a crisper and more resonant sound.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Cherry MX Red is noted for having a textured feel, which can provide a tactile feedback during typing. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Jade offers a silky and creamy typing experience, with a smooth and friction-free sensation that allows for effortless keystrokes. The WS Jade switch's unique construction, including the metal insert and light diffuser, contributes to a rock-solid bottom-out and a creamy typing feel that sets it apart from the MX Red.
In conclusion, when comparing the Cherry MX Red linear switch to the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and feel. If you prefer a slightly heftier feel and deeper, low-pitched sound profile, the MX Red may be the better option for you. However, if you enjoy a bright, clacky sound with a smooth, creamy typing experience, the WS Jade could be the ideal choice. Both switches offer their own unique qualities, and depending on your preferences, you can achieve similar typing results with either switch.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Cherry MX Red linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, consider your preference for bottom out force. If you prefer a switch with no specified bottom out force, the MX Red may be the better choice for you. However, if you prefer a medium bottom out force of 60 grams, the WS Jade could be the ideal pick. Additionally, if you enjoy a slightly heftier feel and deeper sound profile, along with a textured typing experience, the MX Red may be more suitable. On the other hand, if you're drawn to a bright metallic and resonant sound profile, combined with a silky, creamy typing feel, the WS Jade might be the perfect fit. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your individual preferences for bottom out force, sound, and typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
