Kailh NovelKeys Cream vs. Outemu Lotus
An in-depth look at the Kailh NovelKeys Cream and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, the Kailh NovelKeys Cream and the Outemu Lotus are two noteworthy choices to consider. The Cream switch is praised for its heftier linear typing experience, offering a deep sound profile that is both textured and invigorating. On the other hand, the Lotus switch lacks a specific standout feature but still delivers a smooth linear typing experience. If you prefer a switch that provides a satisfying thud and a tactile feel, the Cream switch may be the way to go. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
55g
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
70g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Kailh NovelKeys Cream and the Outemu Lotus switches differ in terms of the material used for both the top and bottom housing. The Cream features a POM top and bottom housing, which creates a deep and muted sound profile. In contrast, the Lotus uses a nylon top and bottom housing, resulting in a fuller and rounder sound due to the softer nature of nylon that absorbs more sound. This leads to a noticeable distinction in sound characteristics between the two switches.
Despite the differences in housing materials, both the NovelKeys Cream and the Outemu Lotus switches aim to provide a unique and pleasing typing experience. The POM top and bottom housing of the Cream contribute to a deeper sound profile, while the nylon top and bottom housing of the Lotus enhance the fullness of the sound. While the specific sound profiles may vary, both switches prioritize providing a satisfying auditory experience for users, showcasing the importance of housing materials in achieving desired sound characteristics.
In terms of functionality, the choice of housing material for both switches plays a significant role in determining the overall sound and feel of typing on the switches. The characteristics of the POM and nylon housing materials are split between the top and bottom of the switch, impacting both the bottom-out sound and feel as well as the sound when releasing a key. This shows that the housing materials are not only important for sound production but also for the tactile feedback and overall typing experience that users will encounter with the NovelKeys Cream and Outemu Lotus switches.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Kailh NovelKeys Cream linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is clear that there are significant differences between the two. The NovelKeys Cream has a higher actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom out force of 70 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus boasts a lighter actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a lighter option. This means that the NovelKeys Cream provides a more substantial typing experience with a stronger push feel, whereas the Outemu Lotus offers a lighter touch for longer typing sessions. The difference in weight between the two switches caters to different preferences, with the NovelKeys Cream being the heavier option and the Outemu Lotus being the lighter option. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference regarding actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Kailh NovelKeys Cream linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it is evident that the Cream has a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Lotus has a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm. The difference may seem minor, but it can have a significant impact on the typing or gaming experience. The Cream switch may provide a more substantial feel due to its longer travel distance, offering a more deliberate keypress. On the other hand, the Lotus switch with its shorter travel distance can provide a quicker response time, which is preferred by gamers seeking faster reactions. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference for either a more responsive or a more tactile typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Kailh NovelKeys Cream has an MSRP of $6.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the NovelKeys Cream for $6.25.
The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Kailh NovelKeys Cream linear switch offers a low-pitched and resonant typing experience. The low-pitched sound profile provides a bass-heavy and mellow tone, while the resonant nature of the switch offers a clean and sharp auditory experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Lotus linear switch's sound profile is currently unknown. When considering the sound of a switch, it is essential to take into account additional factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used, as these can also influence the overall sound produced.
Moving on to the feel, the NovelKeys Cream linear switch is characterized by a buttery, textured, and invigorating typing sensation. The buttery feel indicates a smooth and fluid keystroke, providing a seamless and effortless typing experience. Additionally, the textured nature of the switch may offer noticeable friction when pressed, appealing to users who prefer a slight texture in their typing feedback. The invigorating feel of the NovelKeys Cream switch provides pronounced feedback, a moderate to firm actuation force, and a snappy and reactive feel, creating an immersive typing sensation. On the contrary, information regarding the feel of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is currently unavailable.
In conclusion, the Kailh NovelKeys Cream linear switch offers a deep and low-pitched sound profile, paired with a buttery, textured, and invigorating typing experience. While the sound and feel qualities of the Outemu Lotus linear switch remain unknown at this time, it is essential to consider personal preferences and typing style when selecting a mechanical keyboard switch. Ultimately, both switches have their unique characteristics that may appeal to different users, and experimenting with both can provide insight into what best suits individual typing preferences.
Conclusion
Ultimately, when choosing between the Kailh NovelKeys Cream linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, it all comes down to personal preference and typing style. If you prefer a heavier typing experience with a deep and resonant sound profile, then the NovelKeys Cream may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter keystroke with a lower bottom out force and no specific sound profile preference, the Outemu Lotus could be the better option. Consider your typing preferences, whether you prefer a buttery and textured feel or a smoother typing experience, and choose the switch that best aligns with your preferences. Ultimately, the decision is yours to make based on what feels most comfortable and enjoyable for your typing needs.
Mentioned in this article
