Outemu Lotus vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the Outemu Lotus and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Outemu Lotus and the KTT Phalaenopsis offer distinct typing experiences for users to consider. The Lotus is a linear switch that is best known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis is a tactile switch that boasts a light actuation force of 37g, minimizing finger fatigue during long typing sessions. With a tactile force of 50g, the Phalaenopsis delivers a satisfying bump with each keystroke, enhancing the overall typing experience. While the Lotus provides a consistent feel, the Phalaenopsis offers a tactile feedback that many users find enjoyable. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
35g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
Both the Outemu Lotus and the KTT Phalaenopsis feature distinct housing materials that contribute to the overall sound profile of the switch. The Lotus's nylon top housing offers a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. In contrast, the Phalaenopsis's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, thanks to its stiffer plastic allowing for a clearer and resonant sound. While both materials play a crucial role in determining the sound output of the switches, the nylon in the Lotus provides a different typing experience compared to the polycarbonate in the Phalaenopsis.
Similarly, the bottom housing materials of the Lotus and Phalaenopsis differ in terms of the sound produced during typing. The nylon bottom housing of the Lotus creates a deeper and fuller sound profile, similar to its top housing, due to its softer nature that absorbs sound. Conversely, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Phalaenopsis results in a sharper and crisper sound, emphasizing clarity and resonance. These contrasting properties of the bottom housings contribute to the overall typing experience and sound output of each switch, showcasing the importance of housing materials in switch construction.
When considering switches with differing top and bottom housing materials, it is important to understand how these materials individually impact the sound profile of the switch. The bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed, while the top housing plays a significant role in the sound when a key is released. This separation of housing qualities in switches like the Lotus and Phalaenopsis allows for a more nuanced typing experience, where users can feel the distinct effects of each housing material in different aspects of typing. Ultimately, both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials, providing users with diverse options for their typing preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we can see some similarities and differences. The Lotus has an actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Phalaenopsis has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. Both switches have the same bottom out force, making them equally heavy in that aspect. However, the Lotus is lighter in terms of actuation force compared to the Phalaenopsis. This difference in actuation force may lead to a slightly different typing experience, as the Lotus may feel more responsive with a lighter touch, while the Phalaenopsis may provide a bit more resistance for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the individual's preference for actuation force and the typing experience they are looking for.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we can see that the Lotus has a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm, while the Phalaenopsis has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus's shorter travel distance may appeal to gamers looking for a faster response time, while the Phalaenopsis's longer travel distance may be preferred by those who enjoy a more pronounced key press. Both switches offer unique benefits based on their travel distance, so it ultimately depends on personal preference in terms of responsiveness and key feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Outemu Lotus switch doesn't have any specific reputation or description regarding its sound profile, possibly indicating a neutral or standard sound output. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch is known for producing a bassy and thocky sound. The bassy characteristic offers a deep and rich tone during key presses, resembling the depth and richness associated with bass tones. The thocky feature produces a satisfying and deep sound, creating a pleasant auditory experience whenever a key is pressed or released. It's important to note that the sound of a switch is influenced by various factors like the keyboard layout, keycap material, and even the typing style of the user.
As for the feel, there is no specific information available regarding the tactile feedback of the Outemu Lotus switch. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch is known for its stepped tactile feel. Stepped switches provide a two-stage tactile experience, where users can feel some pre-travel and post-travel sensations throughout the keystroke. This design offers a more subtle tactile response compared to hyper-tactile switches, ensuring a comfortable typing experience with a discernible tactile bump at each press.
Taking into consideration the sound and feel qualities of the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it's clear that they offer distinct experiences to users. While the Lotus switch may offer a more neutral sound profile and undefined tactile feel, the Phalaenopsis switch provides a unique combination of bassy and thocky sound with a stepped tactile sensation. If a user is seeking a switch with a more varied and pronounced auditory and tactile experience, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch would be the preferred choice. However, if consistency and neutrality in sound and feel are desired, the Outemu Lotus switch may provide a suitable alternative with similar results. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches would depend on the individual preferences of the user regarding sound and tactile feedback.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, consider your typing preferences and priorities. If you value a light actuation force and a smooth typing experience without any tactile feedback, the Lotus switch may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you enjoy a tactile bump with a light actuation force for a satisfying typing experience and minimal finger fatigue, then the Phalaenopsis switch would be a great choice. Additionally, if you prefer a deeper and richer sound profile during key presses, the Phalaenopsis switch with its bassy and thocky characteristics may be more appealing to you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences and typing style to ensure a pleasant and enjoyable typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
