United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Outemu Lotus vs. HMX Poro

An in-depth look at the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Poro switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, enthusiasts often find themselves torn between options like the Outemu Lotus and the HMX Poro, both of which are linear switches designed to enhance the typing experience. The Outemu Lotus, while not widely recognized for a specific standout feature, offers a solid, reliable performance that caters to traditionalists who appreciate functionality without frills. On the other hand, the HMX Poro excels in delivering an exceptionally smooth keystroke experience, thanks to its meticulous lubrication and ultra-light actuation force, which results in a delightful poppy sound profile. While the Lotus provides dependable consistency, the Poro impresses with its luxurious tactile feedback and sophisticated sound dynamics. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your unique preferences.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

35g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.30 mm

Total travel

3.70 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

pom

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The Outemu Lotus and HMX Poro switches are both constructed with nylon top and bottom housings, which contribute significantly to their acoustic profiles. Nylon, recognized as a classic switch housing material, brings a distinctive audio quality that both switches share. The inherent properties of nylon allow it to absorb more sound compared to harder plastics, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile during typing. This characteristic is evident in both switches, as users can expect a rounder and more muted auditory experience that enhances the tactile feedback of their typing.

Despite the similarity in material composition, the two switches can offer varied tactile experiences depending on how the housings are engineered. While both employ nylon for their construction, factors like design intricacies and the specific way components fit together can result in differences in feedback and response. While the sound profile remains similar, the feel of the switch can vary slightly due to nuances in design. The impact of the bottom housing will be more pronounced when bottoming out a key, making it essential to consider the overall design and engineering behind each switch.

In essence, both the Outemu Lotus and HMX Poro utilize nylon housings, leading to comparable acoustic results. Users can anticipate a rich typing sound and feel from both switches due to their shared material characteristics. However, the engineering choices made within the execution of each switch can create minor differences in tactile feedback, even as they maintain a consistent sound quality. Ultimately, users seeking a deep and full sound profile will find both options appealing, with the choice between the two possibly hinging on personal preference regarding overall switch feel and design nuances.

Weight

When comparing the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, we find some notable differences in their actuation forces despite having the same bottom out force. The Lotus has a lighter actuation force of 35 grams, while the Poro requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams. Both switches share a bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that users of the Lotus can expect a more effortless keystroke, making it ideal for extended typing sessions, whether at work or during long gaming marathons. Conversely, the Poro's heavier actuation force may provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a firmer feel when pressing the keys. Ultimately, the Lotus is the lighter option, while the Poro is the heavier choice between the two.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, the Lotus features a shorter travel distance of 3.3 mm, while the Poro extends to 3.7 mm. This 0.4 mm difference may seem small, but it can significantly impact user experience. The shorter travel distance of the Lotus may appeal to gamers seeking faster response times and a more responsive feel, aligning with the trend of shorter switch distances in modern keyboards. Conversely, the Poro's longer 3.7 mm travel distance may be preferred by those who enjoy a deeper, more tactile experience when typing, providing a more pronounced keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on individual preferences: for quicker actuation, the Lotus is the better option, whereas the Poro offers a more substantial depth for a different typing sensation.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Poro has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Poro for $2.99.

The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Outemu Lotus switch does not have a defined sound profile to highlight, leaving room for speculation on its acoustic characteristics. On the other hand, the HMX Poro switch is noted for its poppy and clacky sound, which emerges from its ultra-light actuation force. This sound profile is appealing for many who favor an audible feedback while typing or gaming. However, it's important to remember that the ultimate acoustic experience will depend on the combination of the chosen keyboard, keycaps, and the environment in which you’re using it.

Regarding feel, the description of the Outemu Lotus switch is currently undefined, meaning it's challenging to assess how it may compare. The HMX Poro linear switch, however, is celebrated for its silky smooth keystrokes and meticulous lubrication that enhances the gliding action of each press. This smoothness is often a desirable quality in linear switches, providing a seamless experience without the tactile bumps often found in other switch types. Without specific details on the Lotus, it's difficult to rudimentarily compare its feel, although strong smoothness is expected from quality linear switches.

In summary, while the Outemu Lotus lacks specific details on its sound and feel, the HMX Poro linear switch stands out with its satisfying auditory feedback and ultra-smooth keystrokes. If you're after the characteristics of a high-quality linear switch, the Poro provides an attractive option with its distinctive sound and feel. Until more information emerges about the Lotus, potential users may find it challenging to gauge its overall performance and sensory experience in comparison to the more praised HMX Poro.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the HMX Poro linear switch, you'll want to consider your personal preferences and typing style. If you prioritize a straightforward, responsive switch that's easy on the fingers, the Lotus could be suitable for you, especially if you are new to mechanical keyboards and appreciate a lighter actuation force for fast typing or gaming. However, if you’re looking for an enhanced tactile experience with a smoother feel and a pleasing sound profile, the HMX Poro would likely be the better choice due to its meticulously lubricated mechanisms that foster effortless keystrokes. The Poro is designed to provide a silky smooth glide along with a satisfyingly poppy sound, making it ideal for those who enjoy a bit of auditory feedback while typing. Ultimately, your choice should align with whether you value simplicity and ease of use or are drawn to a more enhanced tactile experience.

Mentioned in this article