Outemu Lotus vs. Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring
An in-depth look at the Outemu Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Outemu Lotus, a linear switch, to the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, a tactile switch, there are key differences to consider. The Lotus is best known for its smooth and consistent keystrokes, making it ideal for fast-paced typing and gaming sessions. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring offers a medium level of tactility, providing a satisfying feedback with a gentle bounce. If you prioritize a silent and linear typing experience, the Lotus may be the way to go. However, if you prefer a more tactile and responsive feel with a deep sound profile, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring could be the better choice. Yet, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
35g
Actuation force
48g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
pom
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Outemu Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring, the main difference lies in the material used. The Lotus features a nylon housing, known for its ability to create a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring utilizes a polycarbonate housing, which produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile thanks to its stiffer plastic construction. Despite these differences, both housing materials excel in their ability to impact the sound produced by the switches, with nylon offering a duller and rounder sound while polycarbonate provides a clear and resonant sound.
Another point of comparison is the aesthetic aspect of the housing materials. The Lotus's nylon top and bottom housing contribute to the switch's overall sound profile, creating a deeper and fuller typing experience. In contrast, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring's polycarbonate top and bottom housing result in a sharper and crisper sound, aligning with its transparent design that makes it ideal for showcasing RGB lighting. Although the materials differ in their properties, both nylon and polycarbonate demonstrate their unique qualities in enhancing the sound and feel of the switches, catering to different preferences based on sound profile and visual appeal.
Overall, while the Outemu Lotus and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring utilize different housing materials, they both excel in impacting the sound produced by the switches. Whether it be the nylon top and bottom housing of the Lotus creating a deeper and fuller sound or the polycarbonate top and bottom housing of the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring generating a sharper and crisper sound, each material offers unique characteristics that cater to different typing experiences. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of sound profile, aesthetics, and typing feel.
Weight
The Outemu Lotus linear switch is lighter in actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch. The Lotus requires 35 grams of force to actuate and 50 grams to bottom out, making it a light switch overall. In contrast, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch needs 48 grams to actuate and 55 grams to bottom out, placing it in the medium-light category. The difference in force between the two switches means that the Lotus will feel lighter and easier to type on, while the Shadow (Ink) will offer a slightly more substantial typing experience. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the Lotus being suitable for longer typing sessions and the Shadow (Ink) providing a bit more feedback and resistance for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual typing preferences and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The Outemu Lotus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm, while the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Lotus has a shorter travel distance compared to the Shadow switch. The shorter travel distance of the Lotus may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the Shadow switch may provide those who prefer a more substantial keypress with a more satisfying typing experience. Both switches offer different tactile feedback, with the Lotus being linear and the Shadow switch offering tactile feedback. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring for $3.57.
The Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch offer unique experiences. The Lotus is known for its silent operation, making it a great choice for those who prefer a quieter typing experience. On the other hand, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is praised for its deep and thocky sound profile, adding a satisfying auditory element to each key press. The overall sound produced by a switch is influenced by various factors, including the keyboard and keycaps being used.
Moving on to feel, the Outemu Lotus switch is recognized for None, while the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch is described as bouncy. The bouncy tactile feedback provided by the Shadow switch gives users a spring-like sensation with lively rebound when the keys are pressed, contributing to an engaging typing experience. However, the specific feel of a switch is also subjective and can vary depending on individual preferences and typing styles.
In conclusion, the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch offer distinct characteristics in terms of sound and feel. While the Lotus provides a silent typing experience, the Shadow switch delivers a deep and thocky sound profile paired with a bouncy tactile feedback. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience. If a quieter operation is preferred, the Lotus may be the better option, whereas those looking for a tactile switch with a medium level of tactility and an engaging feel may lean towards the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring switch.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Outemu Lotus linear switch and the Aflion Shadow (Ink) Single Spring tactile switch, you should consider the level of tactility you prefer. If you are looking for a more approachable tactile experience with a lower actuation and bottom-out force, the Shadow (Ink) Single Spring would be a great choice. However, if you prefer a light linear switch, the Lotus may be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for tactility and the type of typing experience you prefer.
Mentioned in this article
