Kailh Plum vs. Gateron Type L
An in-depth look at the Kailh Plum and the Gateron Type L switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the Kailh Plum, a tactile switch, and the Gateron Type L, a linear switch, there are some key differences to consider. The Plum stands out for its unique weightiness without a significant tactile bump, creating a distinct typing experience that is both heavy and smooth. On the other hand, the Type L is part of Sillyworks' innovative "Project Rehash," offering a light touch and deep sound profile that is easy on the ears. While the Plum is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Mild', and 'Stepped', the Type L falls into categories such as 'Neutral', 'Subdued', 'Feathery', and 'Easy-to-press'. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches comes down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
38g
Bottom-out force
70g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
1.70 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Kailh Plum and the Gateron Type L, we see that the Plum features a polycarbonate top housing while the Type L has a nylon top housing. The polycarbonate top housing of the Plum creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, thanks to its stiffness which leads to a more resonant sound. On the other hand, the nylon top housing of the Type L elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound. While both materials have their strengths, the polycarbonate top housing of the Plum may be preferred for those who value a clear and sharp sound, while the nylon top housing of the Type L may appeal to those looking for a deeper and fuller sound.
Moving on to the bottom housings, both the Plum and the Type L feature nylon bottom housings. This means that typing on switches of both keyboards will elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound. While the top housings may vary in material between the two keyboards, the similar nylon bottom housing ensures a consistent sound experience when typing on either keyboard. However, the split between the top and bottom housings means that the qualities of each material will have a greater impact on different aspects of the typing experience.
Overall, the choice between the Kailh Plum and the Gateron Type L will largely come down to personal preference in sound profile. The polycarbonate top housing of the Plum offers a sharper and crisper sound, ideal for those who prefer a clear sound profile. On the other hand, the nylon top housing of the Type L provides a deeper and fuller sound, which may be more appealing to those who enjoy a rounder sound profile. Both keyboards feature nylon bottom housings, ensuring a consistent deep and full sound experience when typing. Whether you prefer the sharpness of polycarbonate or the depth of nylon, both keyboards offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences.
Weight
The Kailh Plum tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch differ in their actuation and bottom out forces. The Plum has a bottom out force of 70 grams, making it a medium to heavy switch, while its actuation force is unknown. In contrast, the Type L has a significantly lighter actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a lighter option overall. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Gateron Type L, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke and bottom out. On the other hand, individuals seeking a more substantial typing feel may opt for the Kailh Plum switch, as it provides a heavier push and bottom out force. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing experience and weight sensitivity.
Travel distance
The Kailh Plum tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, which is shorter than the Gateron Type L linear switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Plum offers a slightly more compact and quicker key press compared to the Type L, which may cater more to gamers looking for faster response times. On the other hand, the Type L provides a slightly deeper keystroke, which may be preferred by those who like a more substantial feel when typing or gaming. Both switches offer a different feel in terms of travel distance, allowing users to choose based on their personal preference for key press depth. Overall, while the Plum is shorter in travel distance compared to the Type L, both switches offer unique experiences that cater to different user preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Kailh Plum comes in at $6.25, whereas the Gateron Type L comes in at $4.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the Kailh Plum and the Gateron Type L switches are described as having a neutral sound profile. This means that they produce a moderate sound level that is suitable for various environments and preferences. However, the Type L switch also adds a touch of subtlety with its subdued sound signature, making it a potentially more appealing option for those looking for a quieter typing experience. It's important to note that the overall sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard itself and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Kailh Plum switch offers a unique tactile experience with a hefty feel but a more subtle tactile bump. This makes it stand out from traditional tactile switches, providing a different typing sensation that may appeal to users looking for a balance between tactility and weightiness. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L switch is exceptionally light to press, described as feathery and easy-to-press. This light actuation force reduces finger fatigue and makes typing effortless, ideal for long gaming or work sessions where comfort is a priority.
In conclusion, both the Kailh Plum tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch have their own unique qualities that cater to different preferences. While the Plum offers a distinctive tactile experience with a neutral sound profile, the Type L provides a feather-light feel with a subdued sound signature. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing feel and sound level. Whether you prefer a unique tactile sensation or a light, easy-to-press switch, both options are likely to provide a satisfying typing experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Kailh Plum tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, consider your preference for bottom out force and typing experience. If you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force and a unique tactile feel without a pronounced bump, the Plum may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a smooth linear feel with a subdued sound profile, the Type L might be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the specific use case for the keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
