Wuque Studio WS Jade vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion
An in-depth look at the Wuque Studio WS Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Wuque Studio WS Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Onion mechanical keyboard switches, it is clear that both offer unique features and benefits. The WS Jade stands out for its metallic insert in the stem base, resulting in a bright and resonant sound profile, as well as a light diffuser for an enchanting RGB display. The typing experience with the WS Jade is described as creamy, smooth, and rock-solid when bottoming out. On the other hand, the WS Onion boasts a polycarbonate top housing and a nylon bottom housing, providing a buttery smooth keystroke feel that is deeply satisfying. These switches also offer a crisp, responsive feel and a neutral sound profile. While the WS Jade is characterized as 'Clacky', 'Marbly', 'Resonant', 'Silky', and 'Creamy', the WS Onion is labeled as 'Neutral', 'Buttery', and 'Polished'. Each switch has its own strengths and appeal, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
UPE
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm double-stage spring
Spring
WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Wuque Studio WS Jade and the WS Onion offer distinctive sound profiles based on the type of plastic used. The POM top housing of the WS Jade creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the polycarbonate top housing of the WS Onion produces a sharper and crisper sound. In terms of aesthetics, polycarbonate is ideal for switches with RGB lighting due to its translucency, whereas POM provides a unique sound experience. Both materials bring their own characteristics to the switches, allowing for a range of options based on user preferences.
On the other hand, the differences in bottom housing materials between the WS Jade and the WS Onion also impact the sound profile of the switches. The POM bottom housing of the WS Jade offers a deep and pleasing sound experience, while the nylon bottom housing of the WS Onion creates a fuller and rounder sound. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound and contributes to a duller sound profile compared to the stiffer POM material. These variations in bottom housing materials provide users with options for a customized typing experience based on their desired sound preferences.
When considering how the top and bottom housing materials interact, it is important to note that each contributes differently to the overall sound profile of the switch. The bottom housing has a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down a key, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing the key. By choosing switches with different top and bottom housing materials, users can fine-tune their typing experience to achieve the desired sound and feel. Whether utilizing POM or polycarbonate, or nylon and POM, the housing materials of the Wuque Studio WS Jade and WS Onion offer unique qualities that cater to individual preferences in mechanical keyboards.
Weight
The Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, which has an unknown actuation force. Both switches have a similar bottom out force, with the WS Jade requiring 60 grams and the WS Onion needing 63.5 grams. The WS Jade can be considered lighter in terms of actuation force, making it suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing experience for more extended periods. On the other hand, the WS Onion provides a slightly heavier bottom out force, offering a more substantial typing feel for users who prefer a stronger push when typing. Overall, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, which is shorter than the 4 mm travel distance of the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch. The WS Jade's shorter travel distance may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the WS Onion's longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying and substantial key press for some users. Both switches offer unique benefits based on their travel distance, with the WS Jade leaning towards a quicker, more responsive feel and the WS Onion offering a deeper, more deliberate key press experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.
The Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the WS Jade linear switch is best known for its bright, metallic, and resonant sound profile. The use of a metallic insert in the stem base creates a clacky and marbly sound that gives a crisp and percussive typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Onion linear switch offers a more neutral sound profile, which makes it suitable for a wide range of users and environments. The WS Onion provides a clean and sharp sound without being too loud or distracting. When it comes to feel, the WS Jade switch is characterized by its silky and creamy typing experience, offering a smooth and buttery sensation with minimal resistance. In contrast, the WS Onion switch is known for its buttery and polished feel, providing a seamless and refined keystroke experience with reduced friction.
Overall, while the WS Jade and WS Onion switches offer different sound and feel qualities, they both provide a satisfying typing experience. The WS Jade switch excels in creating a unique metallic and resonant sound profile, paired with a creamy and silky feel, making it a great choice for those who enjoy a more tactile and audibly engaging typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Onion switch offers a neutral sound profile and a buttery, polished feel, making it a versatile option suitable for a variety of users and settings. Regardless of the choice between the two switches, users can expect a high-quality typing experience with either option.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Wuque Studio WS Jade and WS Onion linear switches, consider the differences in bottom out force, sound profile, and typing feel. If you prefer a slightly lighter bottom out force and enjoy a clacky, marbly, and resonant sound profile, along with a silky and creamy typing experience, the WS Jade may be the perfect choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and a neutral sound profile, along with a buttery and polished typing experience, then the WS Onion could be the ideal switch for your needs. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what specific characteristics you value most in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
