HMX Game1989 vs. Jerrzi Honey Bean
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the Jerrzi Honey Bean switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX 1989 and Jerrzi Honey Bean both present compelling options that cater to slightly different preferences and environments. The HMX 1989, heralded for its deep and thocky feedback, stands out in the HMX Film switch series as an ideal choice for gamers and typists who crave a more tactile response in their keystrokes. In contrast, the Jerrzi Honey Bean switches excel in providing a light and feathery linear action that is not only easy to press but also remarkably silent, making them perfect for office settings or shared workspaces where noise reduction is key. While the 1989 offers a satisfying depth and character for those who appreciate auditory and tactile engagement, the Honey Bean focuses on a smooth, muted experience that promotes a more serene atmosphere. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
42g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T5
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Honey Bean, a notable distinction arises at the very top. The HMX 1989 features a polycarbonate top housing, recognized for its ability to produce a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This high level of clarity is attributed to the stiffer characteristics of polycarbonate, which translates acoustically to a more resonant sound. Its translucency not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the switch but also optimally supports RGB lighting, making it a favorable choice for users who appreciate visual illumination alongside auditory feedback.
In contrast, the Jerrzi Honey Bean utilizes a polyoxymethylene (POM) top housing that delivers quite a different auditory experience. POM is known for yielding a deeper, more muted sound profile, which contrasts starkly with the brighter tones associated with polycarbonate. While both materials serve to influence the overall sound of a switch, the Honey Bean's POM top housing emphasizes warmth and uniqueness over the crisp clarity that polycarbonate provides. Consequently, users may find that the acoustic quality of their Honey Bean deviates significantly from what they would experience with the HMX 1989, favoring those who prefer a less piercing audio landscape.
Turning to the bottom housings, both the HMX 1989 and the Jerrzi Honey Bean present a similarity in utilizing softer plastics—nylon for the former and POM for the latter. Nylon's classic properties enable a deeper and fuller sound profile, softly absorbing sound to produce a rounder acoustic experience. On the other hand, the POM bottom housing of the Honey Bean also contributes to a muted and pleasing sound, though it complements the distinct top housing rather than mirroring the qualities of the nylon. This complementary relationship means that while the switches will produce different sound profiles overall, they can still achieve satisfying results by blending the characteristics of their unique materials, shaping both the bottom-out feel and the auditory feedback in a harmonious manner.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch to the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation forces, while the bottom out force for the Honey Bean remains unknown. The HMX 1989 features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the Honey Bean has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams, which may appeal to those who prefer a gentler touch for longer typing or gaming sessions. However, without a specified bottom out force, we can't determine how it feels when pressed all the way down. This uncertainty leaves the potential for varied experiences depending on personal preference. Overall, if you favor a lighter switch for prolonged use, the Honey Bean may be more suitable, while the HMX 1989 could offer a more substantial typing experience due to its higher actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch, the differences are quite notable. The HMX 1989 features a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with the most traditional travel distance standard. In contrast, the Honey Bean has a shorter travel distance of 3.7 mm, catering to those who might prefer a more responsive typing experience, which is particularly popular among gamers. The longer travel distance of the HMX 1989 could be favored by users who appreciate a more substantial tactile feedback and a deeper press when typing. Therefore, if you prioritize a swift and responsive feel, the Honey Bean is the better choice, while the HMX 1989 would likely appeal to those who prefer a richer, more pronounced keystroke.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The Jerrzi Honey Bean has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Honey Bean for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is characterized by its deep and thocky acoustics, providing a satisfying auditory feedback that resonates with many enthusiasts who enjoy a robust typing experience. In contrast, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch is notably muted, designed to minimize the noise typically associated with mechanical keyboards. This whisper-quiet operation makes the Honey Bean ideal for office environments or shared spaces where sound levels need to be kept to a minimum, allowing users to enjoy a more discreet typing experience. While both switches produce distinctly different sound profiles, it’s essential to recognize that the overall acoustics will also depend on the keyboard used and the keycaps chosen.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 switch delivers a tactile experience that is ideal for those who appreciate a pronounced actuation and a more deliberate typing motion. It provides a balance between resistance and feedback that enthusiasts look for, making it suitable for gaming and intensive typing sessions. On the other hand, the Honey Bean switches are designed for ease of use with gentle resistance and light actuation force, enhancing comfort and minimizing finger fatigue during prolonged typing. Their feathery touch allows users to type effortlessly, making them particularly attractive for casual typists or those who spend long hours on the keyboard.
In summary, the HMX 1989 and Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switches cater to different preferences and needs within the mechanical keyboard community. The 1989 shines with its deep sound and tactile feedback, appealing to users who enjoy a more pronounced typing experience. Conversely, the Honey Bean excels in providing a silent and effortlessly light touch, making it perfect for quiet environments and extended use. Depending on your typing style and the environment in which you’ll be using the keyboard, you can choose either switch, knowing that each offers a unique yet satisfying experience tailored to its intended use.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch, consider your specific needs and preferences. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force that provides a more pronounced tactile experience, the HMX 1989 switch may be your best choice, especially if you enjoy a thocky sound profile that adds character to your keystrokes. This switch is particularly suited for gaming and typing scenarios where you appreciate a deeper acoustics and satisfying keypress feedback. On the other hand, if you're looking for a switch that emphasizes a quiet operation suitable for office environments or shared spaces, the Jerrzi Honey Bean switch shines with its muted sound and exceptionally light actuation force. It is designed to offer a feathery, easy-to-press experience that minimizes finger fatigue during prolonged use, making it ideal for extensive typing or gaming sessions without disturbing those around you. Ultimately, assess where and how you plan to use your keyboard to select the switch that will enhance your overall typing or gaming experience.
Mentioned in this article
