HMX Game1989 vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the HMX Game1989 and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX 1989 and the KTT Kang White represent two distinct options within the realm of linear switches, each catering to different preferences and typing experiences. The HMX 1989, renowned for its deep and "thocky" sound profile, offers a satisfying auditory experience that many gamers and typists alike find appealing, making it an excellent choice for those who enjoy a robust feedback while typing. In contrast, the KTT Kang White dazzles users with its poppy sound and unparalleled smoothness, thanks to its self-lubricating material; this switch is especially favored by typists seeking a sleek and noiseless keystroke. While both switches have their own unique characteristics, they cater to different user needs—whether it's the deep resonance of the HMX 1989 or the whisper-like quietness of the KTT Kang White. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T5
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The HMX 1989 and the KTT Kang White both utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, which results in a notably similar sound profile characterized by sharpness and clarity. Polycarbonate's stiffer composition allows for a more resonant sound, contributing to a higher-pitched auditory experience that enhances the tactile feedback of each key press. This shared material choice ensures that users will find both switches deliver a bright, crisp sound that reacts well to RGB lighting due to the translucency of the polycarbonate. Consequently, whether using the HMX 1989 or the KTT Kang White, enthusiasts can expect vibrant lighting effects and an engaging auditory feedback, making both options attractive for RGB-focused setups.
In contrast, the bottom housings of both switches are made from nylon, adding a different dimension to the overall typing experience. Nylon, a softer plastic, absorbs sound, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile when compared to the polycarbonate top. This material choice creates a rounder and more subdued acoustic experience, allowing users to enjoy a unique blend of auditory feedback that balances the sharper sounds from the top housing. While the top housing's properties define the sound quality during key release, the nylon bottom housing influences the bottom-out feel and sound, contributing to a well-rounded typing experience that users of both switches can appreciate.
Ultimately, the combination of polycarbonate top and nylon bottom housings in both the HMX 1989 and the KTT Kang White yields a cohesive sound profile characterized by high-pitched clarity paired with a deeper resonance. By integrating two distinct materials, both switches achieve a striking auditory balance, appealing to diverse preferences. While the top and bottom housings individually impart unique qualities, their collaboration culminates in an immersive typing experience that is reflected in both models, allowing users to select based on aesthetic and functional preferences without sacrificing auditory satisfaction.
Weight
When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, both exhibit the same actuation force of 45 grams, which means that users will experience similar keystroke triggering resistance with either switch. However, when it comes to their bottom out forces, the two switches differ: the 1989 has a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Kang White has a slightly heftier bottom out force of 58 grams. This distinction indicates that the Kang White provides a firmer push when fully engaged. Consequently, the HMX 1989 is the lighter option overall, making it more suitable for prolonged typing sessions and extended gaming periods without causing fatigue. In contrast, the KTT Kang White offers a heavier feel, favored by users who appreciate a more substantial typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch have a travel distance of 4 mm, indicating that the distance each switch travels from the top to the bottom is identical. As a result, users of either switch will experience a similar feel when pressing down on the keys, which can lead to comparable typing experiences. With both switches having the same travel distance, enthusiasts looking for a linear switch with a consistent actuation feel can confidently choose either option without concern over differences in travel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Game1989 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Game1989 for $3.29.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is celebrated for its deep, thocky acoustic profile, which gives off a rich, resonant sound that many enthusiasts enjoy. This quality makes it particularly engaging for typing and gaming experiences, as the sound adds an immersive element to the act of keypresses. In contrast, the KTT Kang White linear switch produces a low-pitched sound that is described as bass-heavy and mellow, creating a pleasing auditory experience that can enhance typing enjoyment without overly disturbing the surrounding environment. Both switches showcase unique sound characteristics, suggesting that users can achieve satisfying auditory feedback depending on their preference for either a deeper thock or a more subdued pop.
When it comes to feel, the HMX 1989 linear switch is renowned for its deeply satisfying tactile experience, providing a sense of engagement with each keystroke. Its smooth operation contributes to a premium typing experience, though specific attributes like actuation force and travel distance may vary based on individual usage and personal preference. The KTT Kang White, on the other hand, offers an exceptional smoothness due to its self-lubricating materials, making each keypress feel effortless and fluid. This quality is particularly appealing to users looking for a seamless typing experience that minimizes friction, potentially enhancing typing speed and accuracy.
In conclusion, both the HMX 1989 and KTT Kang White linear switches offer distinct sound and feel characteristics that cater to different preferences among keyboard enthusiasts. The 1989 provides a deep, thocky sound and a satisfying typing experience that many find engaging, while the Kang White presents a low-pitched auditory profile coupled with unparalleled smoothness. Ultimately, the choice between these switches depends on whether one values a more resonant auditory experience or a smoother, quieter feel during use. Regardless, users can expect to enjoy good quality typing experiences from both options, with each offering its own unique auditory and tactile appeal.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you lean towards a medium-light switch with a thocky sound profile, the HMX 1989 is an excellent choice, especially if you enjoy a deeper acoustic character and a responsive feel during gaming sessions. Its 53 grams of actuation force make it suitable for those who appreciate a more relaxed typing experience without sacrificing performance. On the other hand, if you're seeking a slightly firmer touch and crave a smooth, poppy feedback that elevates your typing experience, the KTT Kang White's 58 grams of bottom-out force coupled with its low-pitched acoustics may be more appealing. This switch is particularly noteworthy for its smoothness, thanks to its self-lubricating materials, making it a standout for both gaming and extensive typing tasks. Ultimately, your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a softer feel with a thocky sound or a firmer, smoother experience with a delightful auditory feedback.
Mentioned in this article
