HMX Game1989 vs. KTT Mannan Pipefish

Overview

When it comes to choosing mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts often find themselves weighing the unique characteristics of various models to suit their typing preferences. The HMX 1989, known for its deep and thocky sound profile, is part of the HMX Film switch series and delivers a rumbling auditory feedback that many gamers and typists appreciate for its tactile feedback. Conversely, the KTT Mannan Pipefish switch offers a more subdued yet polished experience with its smooth linear action and light 45g actuation force, designed specifically for casual typists who desire effortless keystrokes and a strain-free typing experience. While the HMX 1989 might appeal to those who favor a more pronounced acoustic signature in their keyboard experience, the KTT Mannan Pipefish caters to users looking for a soft and enjoyable typing journey. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that’s right for you.

By the numbers

HMX Game1989 Linear

KTT Mannan Pipefish Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$3.53

$3.05 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The HMX 1989 and the KTT Mannan Pipefish share a striking similarity in their top housing materials, as both utilize polycarbonate. This choice of material contributes significantly to the acoustics of the switches, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile that typifies both models. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate enhances the clarity and resonance of each keystroke, making both switches excellent choices for those who prioritize sound quality in their typing experience. Additionally, the translucence of the polycarbonate allows for effective RGB lighting diffusion, contributing to the aesthetic appeal of each switch and ensuring that they deliver visually vibrant effects when illuminated.

In contrast, the bottom housing of both the HMX 1989 and the KTT Mannan Pipefish is constructed from nylon. This material choice leads to a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer and more absorbent characteristics of nylon. As a result, the typing experience on both switches feels more rounded and subdued, softening the impact of each keystroke against the more pronounced sound delivered by the polycarbonate top housing. While the top housing on both switches enhances the upper frequencies, the nylon bottom contributes to a richer, bassier sound, creating a harmonious blend of auditory elements that works well in both models.

Overall, the similarity in materials used for the top and bottom housings across both switch models reveals how the specific properties of these plastics interact to produce distinct auditory sensations. The polycarbonate top ensures clarity and brightness, while the nylon bottom enriches the sound profile, demonstrating how the combination of a denser, softer material with a stiffer one can enhance the overall typing experience. Consequently, users of both the HMX 1989 and the KTT Mannan Pipefish can expect to enjoy a well-rounded acoustic experience, defined by the unique strengths of each housing material.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, notable differences in actuation and bottom out forces can be observed. The HMX 1989 has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light switch. In contrast, the KTT Mannan Pipefish is lighter, featuring an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. As a result, users may find the Pipefish more suitable for long typing or gaming sessions due to its lighter touch, while the 1989 offers a more substantial feedback with its heavier forces. Essentially, those who prefer a more tactile experience might lean towards the HMX 1989, while those looking for a lighter switch could opt for the KTT Mannan Pipefish. Given the differences in their specifications, users can expect distinct tactile experiences based on which switch they choose.

Travel distance

Both the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch share the same travel distance of 4 mm, meaning that the distance you feel when pressing down on a key is identical for both switches. As a result, users can expect a similar experience in terms of key feel and responsiveness when using either switch. Since both switches have equal travel distances, neither is shorter or longer than the other, allowing for consistent performance across both options.

Price comparison

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the HMX 1989 linear switch is known for its deep and thocky profile, making it ideal for those who enjoy a more pronounced audio feedback when typing, often described as satisfying and rich. This characteristic caters to enthusiasts who appreciate a solid auditory experience, especially in gaming or heavy typing sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish provides a more neutral sound profile. Its moderate actuation force and balanced acoustics make it versatile, suiting a wide range of settings whether at home or in an office environment. While the 1989 offers a signature thock, the Pipefish's sound is subtler, allowing for a more discreet typing experience.

When examining feel, the HMX 1989 boasts a robust tactile response, although specific details about its exact tactile qualities were not provided. The KTT Mannan Pipefish, however, shines in providing an easy-to-press experience thanks to its light 45g actuation force. This results in minimal resistance during key presses, which makes it a sought-after option for casual typists who prioritize comfort and ease over long typing sessions. Additionally, the Mannan Pipefish features a polished design, leading to smooth key travel and reduced friction, enhancing the overall typing sensation. While the 1989 may present a firmer feel, it appeals to users looking for a sturdier typing experience.

In conclusion, while the HMX 1989 linear switch delivers a deeper and thockier sound, ideal for enthusiasts seeking auditory satisfaction, the KTT Mannan Pipefish offers a more neutral sound profile along with effortless key actuation and a polished feel that caters to those focused on comfort and convenience. Depending on your preferences, if you enjoy a more engaging sound, the 1989 might be your pick. Alternatively, if you prioritize a comfortable and smooth typing experience with flexibility across environments, the Mannan Pipefish is an excellent choice. Ultimately, both switches provide unique experiences, ensuring users can find their preferences catered to.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, your personal preferences and typing habits should guide your choice. If you prefer a switch that provides a thocky sound and feel, along with a slightly firmer bottom-out force of 53 grams, the HMX 1989 would be more suitable, especially for gaming or fast-paced work that requires a confident keystroke. However, if you lean towards a lighter touch with effortless key presses, the Mannan Pipefish, with its 45-gram force, would be ideal for you, particularly if you engage in extended typing sessions or casual writing where comfort and reduced fatigue are paramount. The Pipefish’s polished finish and neutral sound profile make it versatile for any environment, whether you're at home or in an office setting. In essence, choose the HMX 1989 for a deeper and more pronounced feedback experience, and embrace the Mannan Pipefish for a refined, smooth, and easy-going typing journey.

Mentioned in this article

HMX Game1989 Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

KTT Mannan Pipefish Linear

$3.53

$3.05 per 10

Learn more