Sarokeys BCP vs. KTT Matcha
An in-depth look at the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Matcha switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to compare are the Sarokeys BCP, a linear switch, and the KTT Matcha, a tactile switch. The Sarokeys BCP, known for its creamy and bouncy feel, offers a streamlined experience derived from the iconic Black Cherry Pies. With a signature poppy and clacky sound profile, typing on the BCPs provides a satisfying tactile response. On the other hand, the KTT Matcha stands out for its comfortable and snappy tactility, creating a clean bottom-out sound with its long pole stem. While the BCP emphasizes creaminess and clackiness, the Matcha boasts a mix of snappiness and subtle tactility. However, diving deeper into the specifics of each switch will help determine the best choice for individual preferences.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
51g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
57g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
1.30 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.20 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Single-staged 20mm lengthened spring
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Matcha, it is clear that they both offer unique sound profiles based on their respective materials. The BCP's nylon top and bottom housing creates a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the Matcha's polycarbonate top and bottom housing produce a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer properties that result in a clearer and resonant sound. While the BCP offers a duller and rounder sound, the Matcha provides a more precise and defined auditory experience.
Furthermore, aesthetically speaking, the housing materials of the BCP and the Matcha differ in terms of transparency. The BCP's nylon housing is opaque, while the Matcha's polycarbonate housing is clear. This difference can impact the visual appeal of the switches, especially if RGB lighting is involved. The translucent nature of the polycarbonate housing in the Matcha allows for a more vibrant display of RGB lighting, creating a visually appealing effect that the opaque nylon housing of the BCP may not achieve. This distinction in housing materials can influence the overall look and feel of the switches in a mechanical keyboard setup.
Despite their differences, both the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Matcha ultimately provide a unique typing experience based on their respective housing materials. While the BCP's nylon housing offers a softer and more absorbent sound profile, the Matcha's polycarbonate housing delivers a crisper and more resonant sound. The split between top and bottom housing impacts the typing experience as well, with the bottom housing affecting the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. Ultimately, both switches offer distinct qualities that cater to different preferences in terms of sound and aesthetics.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Sarokeys BCP linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, it is evident that the Matcha is the lighter option, as it has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the BCP is slightly heavier with an actuation force of 51 grams and a bottom out force of 57 grams. The Matcha provides a smoother and lighter typing experience, perfect for those who prefer a softer touch for extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the BCP offers a more substantial typing experience with slightly higher actuation and bottom out forces, ideal for users who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
The Sarokeys BCP linear switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm, while the KTT Matcha tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the BCP has a shorter travel distance compared to the Matcha. A shorter travel distance can be advantageous for gamers looking for faster response times, as it allows for quick actuation of the keys. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the Matcha can provide a more satisfying typing experience for those who prefer a deeper key press. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Sarokeys BCP has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the BCP for $4.85.
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Matcha switches are described as having a clacky sound profile. This means that they both produce a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, giving off a crisp, bright, and percussive auditory experience. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Sarokeys BCP switch is known for its bouncy and creamy typing experience. The keys offer a spring-like, elastic feedback sensation, giving users a lively feel with a rebound effect when pressed. On the other hand, the KTT Matcha switch is described as stepped, snappy, accented, feathery, and subtle. This means that it provides a tactile response with two stages, exceptional responsiveness, a prominent amount of tactility without being overwhelming, a light actuation force for reduced finger fatigue, and a gentle resistance with a light typing feel suitable for shared spaces.
Overall, both the Sarokeys BCP and KTT Matcha switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the BCP provides a clacky sound profile with a bouncy and creamy typing experience, the Matcha switch offers a stepped tactility with responsiveness, prominent tactility, ease of use, and a subtle typing feel. Depending on personal preferences and typing style, both switches can deliver a satisfying typing experience with their respective qualities. Ultimately, whether you choose the BCP or Matcha, you can expect to achieve similar results in terms of sound and feel but with distinct characteristics that cater to different typing preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when making a decision between the Sarokeys BCP linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, consider your preferences for bottom out force, sound profile, and typing feel. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force and enjoy a creamy, bouncy typing experience with a signature clacky sound, the BCP may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force, a snappy and clean tactility, and a switch with a variety of subtle and snappy attributes like a stepped and accented feel, the Matcha could be the ideal option. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences, so choose the one that aligns best with your typing style and desired typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
