Aflion Blush vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the Aflion Blush and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Blush and the Bsun Hutt offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Blush, a linear switch, is praised for its smooth and snappy feel, thanks to its longer two-stage spring and poppy sound signature. On the other hand, the Hutt, a tactile switch, stands out for its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump, providing a distinctive typing experience with a balanced sound profile. While the Blush is known for its low-pitched and creamy characteristics, the Hutt is characterized by its snappy and sharp attributes. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Dual-stage stainless steel spring
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
Both the Aflion Blush and the Bsun Hutt utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a relatively stiffer plastic, which enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound produced. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for use in switches with RGB lighting, adding a visually appealing element to the typing experience. In terms of sound, the top housing material plays a significant role in shaping the overall sound profile of the switch, particularly upon key release.
On the other hand, while both keyboards feature a nylon bottom housing, they offer a different typing experience compared to their top housing material. Typing on switches with a nylon bottom housing results in a deeper and fuller sound profile, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics, creating a duller and rounder sound. The bottom housing material mainly affects the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch when pressed down, contributing to the overall typing experience and sound produced.
In summary, the Aflion Blush and the Bsun Hutt share similarities in their use of polycarbonate for the top housing, which enhances the sound profile with its stiffer properties and translucency. However, they differ in their choice of nylon for the bottom housing, with nylon offering a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature. Understanding how each housing material impacts the sound and feel of the switch is crucial in selecting a keyboard that best suits individual preferences for typing experience and sound aesthetics.
Weight
The Aflion Blush linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch both offer unique characteristics in terms of actuation force and bottom out force. The Blush switch has a bottom out force of 58 grams, providing a medium level of resistance, while the actuation force is not specified. On the other hand, the Hutt switch has a lower bottom out force of 49 grams and a lighter actuation force of 40 grams, making it a lighter option overall. For those who prefer a more substantial typing experience, the Blush switch might be the preferred choice due to its higher bottom out force. In contrast, the Hutt switch offers a lighter typing feel, making it more suitable for longer typing or gaming sessions. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Aflion Blush linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm, which is slightly shorter than the Bsun Hutt tactile switch with a travel distance of 3.5 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them ideal for those seeking faster response times, such as gamers. The Blush offers a slightly quicker actuation due to its shorter travel distance, while the Hutt provides a bit more depth, which some users may prefer for a more tactile typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the level of responsiveness desired.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Blush has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Blush for $4.07.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Aflion Blush linear switch offers a low-pitched tone, providing a bass-heavy and mellow sound profile. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch produces a resonant sound, featuring a higher-pitched and sharp auditory experience. The Blush switch's poppy sound signature complements its smooth and snappy feel, while the Hutt switch's balanced sound profile enhances its distinctive typing experience, creating an immersive and enjoyable auditory sensation depending on personal preference, keycaps, and keyboard choice.
As for the typing feel, the Aflion Blush linear switch is described as creamy, silky, and buttery, offering a smooth and fluid typing experience thanks to its longer, two-stage spring design. This switch allows for effortless keystrokes with a seamless and uniform sensation. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is characterized by its snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented tactile feedback. With a prominent tactile bump and moderate to firm actuation force, this switch provides a reactive and immersive typing experience that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. Both switches cater to different typing preferences, with the Blush focusing on smoothness and the Hutt emphasizing tactility and feedback.
Considering all the available information, the Aflion Blush linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offer unique and contrasting experiences in terms of sound and feel. While the Blush provides a low-pitched and smooth typing feel, complemented by its poppy sound signature, the Hutt delivers a resonant and tactile typing experience with a balanced sound profile. Depending on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing style, users can choose between these two switches to achieve their desired typing experience. Ultimately, both switches offer high-quality performance, whether it be through smoothness or tactility, catering to a wide range of preferences within the mechanical keyboard community.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when choosing between the Aflion Blush linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, consider your preference in terms of actuation force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a medium bottom out force and a smooth, full, and snappy typing experience with a poppy sound signature, the Blush linear switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a distinctive typing experience with a prominent tactile bump and a balanced sound profile, the Hutt tactile switch might be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches comes down to your personal typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
