United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron CJ vs. Huano Matcha Latte V2

An in-depth look at the Gateron CJ and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch for your typing experience, two noteworthy contenders are the Gateron CJ and the Huano Matcha Latte V2, both of which fall into the linear switch category. The Gateron CJ switches are celebrated for their unique auditory and tactile characteristics, providing higher-pitched clacks and a remarkably smooth push feel that delivers a delightful typing experience. Often described with a blend of descriptors such as "chirpy" and "thocky," these switches can invigorate your keyboard sounds while offering a neutral yet satisfying response. On the other hand, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 switches shine with their understated yet pleasing linear typing experience, striking a balance between lightness and a solid bottom-out feel. Their generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble enhance their performance, making them an excellent choice for those seeking premium quality at a more accessible price point. While both switches cater to different preferences, they each have qualities that could elevate your typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Proprietary INK blend

Top housing material

POK

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Gateron CJ and the Huano Matcha Latte V2, we note a fundamental difference in their top housings, which greatly impacts their sound profiles. The Gateron CJ features a proprietary INK blend top housing that produces a distinct, clacky sound characterized as high-pitched yet not excessively sharp. This quality provides a unique auditory experience that many users find satisfying during typing. In contrast, the Matcha Latte V2 utilizes a POK top housing made of polyketone. While it also delivers a smooth and clacky sound, the inherent properties of POK—having a higher coefficient of friction and exceptional durability—suggest that it may have a different acoustic character than the CJ. Nonetheless, both materials contribute to a generally higher-pitched sound profile, affirming a shared affinity for producing pronounced auditory feedback.

On the bottom side, the CJ employs a POM housing, known for its unique sound signature, which tends to be deeper and more muted compared to other materials. This contrasts with the Matcha Latte V2, which uses a nylon bottom housing that elicits similar properties of depth and fullness. Nylon’s softer plastic nature absorbs more sound, creating a rounder and more subdued tone. Although the specific sound profiles may differ, both the POM and nylon contribute to a fuller, warmer auditory experience in their respective switches. The combination of the POM housing with the top's high-pitched INK blend results in a distinctive sound that is balanced by its muted characteristics, while the nylon of the Matcha Latte V2 retains that depth but with a potentially softer overall tone.

In the context of switch performance, the differences in materials lead to a division of sound qualities and tactile experiences between the upper and lower housings. The efficacy of each switch will depend on how the interplay of these materials affects both bottom-out sound and key release. For example, while the CJ’s muted bottom may soften the impact sound, the pronounced clack from its INK top will enhance the auditory feedback upon release. Conversely, the Matcha Latte V2's nylon bottom will absorb some sound, leading to a subtler bottoming-out experience, complemented by the clack of the POK top. Ultimately, despite their material distinctions, users familiar with Gateron or Huano switches may find satisfactorily similar results in terms of smoothness and rewarding auditory feedback, albeit with subtle variations in depth and pitch.

Weight

The Gateron CJ linear switch features an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, categorizing it as a medium-weight switch. In contrast, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch boasts a lighter actuation force of 45 grams; however, its bottom out force is unknown. This difference in actuation force indicates that the Matcha Latte V2 may be more suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch, allowing for longer typing sessions with less finger fatigue. On the other hand, the CJ switch, with its heavier actuation force, may provide a more substantial feel that some typists and gamers appreciate for its tactile feedback. Because the Matcha Latte V2 has an unspecified bottom out force, it is impossible to draw a direct comparison in that regard. Therefore, while both switches cater to distinct preferences, the CJ switch is the heavier option, making it preferable for those seeking a firmer typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switch, notable differences emerge. The Gateron CJ has a travel distance of 4 mm, which aligns with the most traditional standard, offering a more pronounced feedback and a satisfying depth for those who enjoy a hearty typing experience. In contrast, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 features a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm, catering to users who prefer quicker actuation and a more responsive feel, which is often favored by gamers. Therefore, the CJ switch is the longer option, while the Matcha Latte V2 is shorter, suggesting that users seeking swift action should opt for the Matcha Latte, while those valuing depth and a more tactile response might prefer the Gateron CJ.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CJ for $5.35.

The Huano Matcha Latte V2 comes in at $3.99 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When comparing the sound characteristics of the Gateron CJ and Huano Matcha Latte V2 linear switches, the CJ switch presents a unique auditory profile. It is described as having a chirpy and low-pitched sound, accompanied by a neutral tone that makes it versatile for various settings, whether you’re typing at home or in a work environment. The CJ's sound is further characterized by a thocky quality, delivering a rich and deep sound upon actuation, which can enhance the typing experience dramatically. On the other hand, there is no specific information about the sound profile of the Matcha Latte V2, leaving its auditory characteristics somewhat unknown. Thus, users looking for a distinctive sound signature may lean towards the Gateron CJ.

In terms of tactile feel, the Gateron CJ switch is noted for its mild experience, providing a gentle touch that can be appealing to a broad audience. This mildness allows for a comfortable and approachable typing experience, as it avoids the extremes often found in other switch types. Conversely, there is currently no information about the feel of the Matcha Latte V2, which leaves a gap in understanding how it might compare. Therefore, if you seek a reliably smooth typing experience with a more subdued tactile sensation, the CJ may be the preferable choice, while the Matcha Latte V2's feel remains uncertain.

In conclusion, the Gateron CJ linear switch stands out for its chirpy sound, rich thocky profile, and mild feel, making it an engaging option for those who enjoy a blend of auditory and tactile feedback. Meanwhile, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 offers an appealing type of smoothness and solid bottom-out feel, but its sound and feel qualities remain unknown based on the current information. For newcomers to mechanical keyboards, the CJ may present a more defined and satisfying experience, particularly regarding sound, while the Matcha Latte V2 may still be worth considering if smoothness is prioritized over distinctive auditory qualities.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Huano Matcha Latte V2 switch, consider your personal preferences in terms of force, sound, and feel. If you're looking for a switch that delivers a unique auditory experience with higher-pitched clacks and a smooth push feel, the Gateron CJ is an excellent choice. Its medium bottom-out force of 60 grams provides a satisfying resistance that many typists appreciate, making it a solid option for both general use and gaming. On the other hand, if you prefer a more subtle and harmonious typing experience, the Huano Matcha Latte V2 might be your better bet, especially if you value accessibility and premium performance with its factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble. While the CJ offers an engaging auditory signature that could be more entertaining for typing, the Matcha Latte V2 excels in providing a balanced, smooth experience without any distracting sounds, which can be ideal for quieter environments or prolonged typing sessions. Therefore, your choice should ultimately reflect your typing style, environmental context, and whether you prioritize auditory enjoyment or a balanced, smooth experience.

Mentioned in this article