Durock Daybreak vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Durock Daybreak and the Bsun Hutt mechanical keyboard switches, it is clear that both offer unique typing experiences that cater to different preferences. The Daybreak is a linear switch known for its solid 67g actuation force, providing a heavier touch that is well-suited for those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the Hutt is a tactile switch with a medium-heavy spring and a noticeable tactile bump, offering a distinctive typing experience that is both enjoyable and satisfying. While the Daybreak is praised for its quiet operation and polished, muted, low-pitched feel, the Hutt is appreciated for its snappy, invigorating, sharp, accented, and resonant characteristics. When choosing between the two, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the Bsun Hutt both utilize polycarbonate for the top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This makes them ideal for switches that prioritize clear and resonant sound. However, the Daybreak and Hutt differ in their choice of bottom housing material. The Daybreak uses nylon for its bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile that is more absorbent of sound compared to the Hutt's polycarbonate bottom housing, which creates a duller and rounder sound.
Although both the Daybreak and the Hutt use polycarbonate for their top housing, the difference in their bottom housing material affects the overall sound produced by the switches. The Daybreak's combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing creates a unique sound profile that is both sharp and deep. On the other hand, the Hutt's consistent use of polycarbonate for both top and bottom housings results in a more uniform sound profile that is sharp and resonant throughout. Depending on personal preference, users may find one switch more appealing than the other based on the desired sound characteristics.
In terms of functionality, the top and bottom housings play a significant role in the overall sound and feel of a switch. The impact of the bottom housing is felt when pressing down on a key, influencing the bottom-out sound, while the top housing affects the sound when releasing a key. The Daybreak's use of nylon for the bottom housing may provide a different tactile experience compared to the Hutt's polycarbonate bottom housing. Ultimately, the choice between the Daybreak and the Hutt will depend on individual preferences for sound profile and typing feel.
Weight
The Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch have differences in both actuation force and bottom out force. The Durock Daybreak has no specified actuation force and a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it medium-heavy. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, making it lighter in comparison. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience for longer periods of time, the Bsun Hutt would be the better option. However, for users who enjoy a more substantial typing feel, the Durock Daybreak would be the preferred choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches would come down to personal preference in terms of typing experience.
Travel distance
The Durock Daybreak linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, with the Daybreak being slightly longer than the Hutt. Shorter travel distances are becoming more popular, especially among gamers who value faster response times. The shorter travel distance of the Hutt may appeal to those looking for quick and snappy keystrokes, while the slightly longer travel distance of the Daybreak may provide a more pronounced typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and overall typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a muted and low-pitched experience, providing a softer and quieter typing sound with a bass-heavy tone. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch delivers a resonant sound profile that is clean, sharp, and higher-pitched, creating an immersive auditory experience. Both switches have unique sound characteristics that cater to different preferences, with the Daybreak focusing on a quiet operation and the Hutt offering a distinctive auditory feedback.
Moving on to feel, the Durock Daybreak linear switch is described as polished, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is characterized as snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented, providing super responsive feedback, a firm actuation force, a crisp tactile bump, and a medium amount of tactility. While the Daybreak emphasizes a polished feel, the Hutt focuses on a lively and tactile typing sensation, making each keypress distinct and engaging.
Overall, the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offer unique subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Daybreak provides a quiet and polished typing experience with a heavier actuation force, while the Hutt delivers a resonant and tactile feedback with a medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump. Depending on personal preferences for sound levels and tactile feedback, both switches offer distinct typing experiences that cater to varying needs and preferences in the mechanical keyboard community. Ultimately, users can expect different but equally satisfying results with these two switches based on their individual preferences for sound and feel.
Conclusion
In closing, when determining whether to choose the Durock Daybreak linear switch or the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, consider your preference for typing experience. If you enjoy a heavier actuation force and a quieter typing session, the Daybreak may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you appreciate a lighter touch with a prominent tactile bump and resonant sound profile, the Hutt switch could better suit your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing style and the specific characteristics that matter most to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
