United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Durock Daybreak vs. KTT Matcha

An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Matcha switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Matcha are two popular options with distinct characteristics. The Daybreak is a linear switch, offering a solid 67g actuation force for a heftier typing experience. Its quiet operation makes it suitable for workspaces where noise reduction is crucial. On the other hand, the Matcha is a tactile switch known for its comfortable and snappy tactility, providing a clean bottom-out sound. While the Daybreak is categorized as polished, muted, and low-pitched, the Matcha is described as stepped, snappy, accented, clacky, feathery, and subtle. Each switch has its unique qualities that may cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Matcha, both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a similar sharp, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which leads to a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches using RGB lighting. However, the Daybreak differs in its use of nylon for the bottom housing, creating a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Matcha's polycarbonate bottom housing, which absorbs less sound and produces a sharper sound.

The contrasting housing materials of the Daybreak and Matcha highlight the impact on the overall sound and feel of the switches. The nylon bottom housing of the Daybreak creates a duller and rounder sound when compared to the crisper sound produced by the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Matcha. This split in housing materials means that the qualities of each material are felt differently depending on whether you are pressing down on a key or letting go. The bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing plays a significant role in the sound when releasing a key.

In terms of design and aesthetics, both the Daybreak and Matcha benefit from the use of polycarbonate in their top housings, especially for switches that utilize RGB lighting. The clear nature of polycarbonate allows for light to shine through, enhancing the visual appeal of the switches. However, the choice of nylon for the Daybreak's bottom housing sets it apart from the Matcha, providing a deeper and fuller sound experience that may appeal to users looking for a more muted typing sound. Ultimately, the housing materials of the Daybreak and Matcha contribute to their unique sound profiles and overall typing experience.

Weight

The Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch differ in terms of actuation and bottom out forces. The Daybreak has an actuation force of None grams, while the Matcha has a force of 40 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Daybreak requires 67 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch, compared to the Matcha's 45 grams, which is considered light. The Daybreak provides a more substantial typing experience with a heavier push feel, while the Matcha offers a lighter option, making it suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

In comparing the travel distance of the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, it is evident that the Daybreak has a shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm compared to the Matcha's 4 mm. The Daybreak's slightly shorter distance may appeal to those seeking a quicker response time, particularly gamers. On the other hand, the Matcha's slightly longer travel distance may offer a more satisfying depth for those who prefer a more substantial feel when typing. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Daybreak leaning towards the shallower end and the Matcha towards the more standard 4.0 mm distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches may come down to personal preference for travel distance and typing feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.

The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a muted and low-pitched sound profile, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a quieter typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Matcha tactile switch is described as clacky, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. Depending on personal preference and the keyboard setup, users can customize the sound profile to best suit their needs.

In terms of feel, the Daybreak switch is known for its polished finish, providing a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. In contrast, the Matcha switch offers a stepped, snappy, and accented feel, providing a tactile experience with two distinct stages and responsive feedback. The Matcha switch also features a feathery actuation force, making it comfortable for extended typing sessions.

Overall, the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Daybreak switch provides a quieter and polished typing experience with a heavier actuation force, the Matcha switch offers a snappier and more tactile feel with a lighter actuation force. Depending on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing style, both switches can provide a satisfying typing experience with unique characteristics. Ultimately, users can expect a difference in sound and feel between the two switches, allowing for customization based on personal preference and typing needs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when deciding between the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, consider your personal typing preferences and the environment in which you'll be using the keyboard. If you prefer a heavier typing experience with a quieter operation, the Daybreak switch with its 67g bottom out force and muted, low-pitched sound may be the better choice for you, especially in a workspace where noise level is a concern. On the other hand, if you enjoy a lighter touch with a snappy tactility and a clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha switch with its 45g bottom out force and stepped, snappy, accented feel may be more suitable, particularly for tasks like gaming or extended typing sessions. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what feels most comfortable and efficient for you as you type.

Mentioned in this article