HMX EVA vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the HMX EVA and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the choice between the HMX EVA and the Bsun Hutt can significantly influence your typing experience. The HMX EVA, a linear switch, is celebrated for its smooth typing feel inspired by the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01. It offers a clean, consistent keystroke without any tactile feedback, making it an ideal choice for those who prefer a quieter, uninterrupted typing session. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt stands out as a tactile switch that features a medium-heavy spring and a distinct tactile bump, providing a more engaging typing experience marked by its snappy and resonant sound profile. This switch is often favored by users who enjoy feeling and hearing their keystrokes, enhancing their typing satisfaction. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the EVA appealing to users seeking smoothness and the Hutt attracting those who desire tactile feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
When comparing the HMX EVA and the Bsun Hutt in terms of their housing materials, a notable distinction exists between their top housings. The EVA features a nylon top housing, while the Hutt employs polycarbonate. Nylon, being a softer plastic, is designed to retain sound, producing a deeper and fuller auditory experience that many typists appreciate for its warm tonal qualities. Conversely, the Hutt’s polycarbonate top housing delivers a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. This rigidity in the material results in a more resonant and clear output when a key is released, making for a crisper typing experience. Thus, while both switches are designed to facilitate a specific auditory feedback, their approaches contrast significantly, with the EVA aiming for warmth and depth, whereas the Hutt targets clarity and sharpness.
Analyzing the bottom housings of the two switches reveals an interesting similarity: both the EVA and the Hutt feature nylon bottom housings. This shared material ensures that both switches will elicit a deeper, fuller sound profile when a key is bottomed out. Since nylon is effective in absorbing sound, the tactile and auditory feedback experienced during a keypress should feel plush and satisfying in both instances. Consequently, despite the difference in their top housings, the bottom housing commonality ensures that users can expect similar results in terms of bottom-out feel and sound from both switches. This unity in the bottom housing creates a foundation that contributes significantly to the overall typing experience.
In summary, the HMX EVA and Bsun Hutt present contrasting top housing materials that influence their sound profiles distinctly, yet they converge in their lower housings, where nylon’s acoustic properties create a consistent experience. The EVA, with its nylon top, caters to users who prefer a warmer, deeper sound, while the Hutt’s polycarbonate top appeals to those seeking crisp brightness. However, the shared nylon bottom housing ties them together, moderating the bottom-out sound and ensuring a cushioned touch. As such, the overall typing experience, informed by both the differences and similarities in their materials, provides users a rich palette of auditory and tactile feedback.
Weight
When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX EVA linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, both options offer relatively light forces, making them suitable for prolonged typing sessions or gaming. The EVA switch requires an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, while the Hutt switch has slightly lighter actuation at 40 grams but a marginally heavier bottom out force of 49 grams. Although both switches can provide a similar typing experience due to their light actuation forces, the EVA switch allows for a slightly more effortless keystroke activation. Consequently, those who prefer a lighter feel may gravitate towards the Hutt for its lower actuation requirement, while the EVA might appeal to individuals seeking a bit more resistance before bottoming out. Overall, the EVA is marginally heavier in terms of actuation force, while the Hutt is heavier at bottom out.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX EVA linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, we see a slight variation between the two. The HMX EVA has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Bsun Hutt measures 3.5 mm. This makes the Hutt switch the shorter option, albeit by a mere 0.1 mm. For gamers or users who prioritize quick response times, the shorter travel of the Hutt might be preferable, allowing for faster actuation. On the other hand, those who favor a more substantial feel in their keystrokes might opt for the EVA, given its slightly greater travel distance. Both switches fall within the modern trend of shorter travel distances, but they cater to different preferences in tactile feedback and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EVA has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EVA for $2.99.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When evaluating the sound characteristics of the HMX EVA and the Bsun Hutt switches, distinct differences emerge. The HMX EVA boasts a resonant sound signature, which typically implies a higher-pitched and immersive auditory experience. This resonant quality can create a lively typing atmosphere. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt features a more balanced sound profile that is clean and sharp, making it ideal for those who prefer a sound that is pleasant yet not intrusive. The auditory experience with the Hutt switch may resonate well with users looking for something refined and focused, while the EVA provides a more dynamic and robust sound.
Regarding their tactile feel, the HMX EVA is renowned for its silky smooth typing experience, allowing for fluid key presses without significant resistance. This smoothness contrasts with the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, which presents a much more distinct typing sensation. The Hutt is characterized by a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, resulting in a feedback-rich encounter that feels invigorating and snappy. This juxtaposition between the smoothness of the EVA and the pronounced tactile response of the Hutt means that users will ultimately experience vastly different sensations while typing; one is about seamless motion and the other about definitive feedback.
In summary, choosing between the HMX EVA and the Bsun Hutt switches boils down to a preference for sound and feel. If you value a resonant and immersive sound with a silky typing experience, the EVA may be your ideal choice. Conversely, if you prefer a balanced sound profile accompanied by a snappy and invigorating tactile sensation, the Hutt is likely better suited to your needs. Both switches offer unique attributes that cater to different typing styles, making it important to consider what aspects of sound and feel resonate most with your personal preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, your choice between the HMX EVA linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal typing preferences and intended usage. If you favor a smooth and fluid typing experience, appreciating a lighter bottom out force, and you enjoy a sound profile that is pleasant yet unobtrusive, the HMX EVA is an ideal fit. Its elegant design is inspired by the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01, making it not only functional but also visually captivating. Conversely, if you seek a more engaging tactile experience that provides clear feedback and a slightly heavier actuation force, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is your ideal companion. Its prominent tactile bump and balanced sound profile will appeal to those who revel in a snappy and invigorating typing sensation, enhancing both productivity and enjoyment during long typing sessions. Consider the environments you’ll be in—if you need a quieter setup, the EVA may be better suited for that, whereas in a more dynamic setting where feedback matters, the Hutt’s tactile nature stands out. Ultimately, aligning your choice with your typing style and aesthetic preferences will lead you to the switch that enhances your mechanical keyboard journey.
Mentioned in this article
