HMX EVA vs. KTT Matcha
An in-depth look at the HMX EVA and the KTT Matcha switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX EVA and the KTT Matcha provide two distinct options that cater to different typing preferences and experiences. The HMX EVA is a linear switch celebrated for its silky smooth typing feel and resonant sound signature, drawing inspiration from the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01. This makes it an excellent choice for users prioritizing a seamless and uninterrupted keystroke, ideal for both gaming and typing where speed is essential. In contrast, the KTT Matcha is a tactile switch that delivers a satisfying snappy feel, celebrated for its distinct bottom-out sound and pronounced tactile feedback. Its unique characteristics make it perfect for those who enjoy a more engaged typing experience, where each key press is met with a delightful response. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The HMX EVA and KTT Matcha keyboards both feature distinctive housing materials that significantly influence their performance and sound profiles. The HMX EVA utilizes nylon for both its top and bottom housings, a classic choice known for its ability to create a deeper and fuller sound. Nylon's softness allows it to absorb sound more effectively than harder plastics, contributing to a duller yet rounder acoustic experience. In contrast, the KTT Matcha employs polycarbonate for both the top and bottom housings, a material recognized for its stiffness and translucency. This results in a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile that is crisper and more resonant. While both keyboards use high-quality materials, the difference in the plastic used may lead to distinct auditory experiences.
Both keyboards demonstrate how the housing material affects the tactile and auditory feedback during use. With the EVA's nylon housings, users will notice a mellow sound when typing, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a quieter typing experience. Conversely, the Matcha's polycarbonate composition provides a more vibrant, pronounced sound, appealing to users who enjoy the acoustics of typing or gaming. These differences can be particularly pronounced when typing at speed, where the EVA's softer material will deliver a subdued response compared to the Matcha's clearer, more resonant sound.
However, if one were to mix and match the housings from either keyboard, similar sound results could still be achieved by balancing the materials. For example, pairing a polycarbonate top housing from the Matcha with a nylon bottom housing from the EVA would blend the crispness of the former with the mellower qualities of the latter. This combination would allow users to experience a unique sound profile that harnesses the benefits of both materials—softness complemented by a sharpness that provides a rounded, yet clear typing experience. Thus, while distinct, the overlapping properties of nylon and polycarbonate housing could still lead to satisfactory performance by creating a more personalized acoustic signature.
Weight
The HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch both feature relatively light actuation and bottom out forces, making them suitable choices for users who prioritize comfort during extended typing sessions or gaming. The EVA has an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, while the Matcha offers an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. While both switches share a similar light feel, the Matcha is slightly lighter in terms of actuation force, which may appeal to those looking for an even easier keystroke. In contrast, the EVA has a marginally higher bottom out force, giving it a slightly firmer feel when fully pressed down. Thus, for a typing experience that balances ease with slight resistance, the Matcha may be the preferred choice, whereas the EVA caters to those who appreciate a touch more feedback at the bottom of the keystroke.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, the two clearly differ, with the EVA featuring a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Matcha has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This means that the EVA switch provides a more responsive feel, which is often preferred by gamers seeking quicker response times. In contrast, the Matcha’s greater travel distance is likely to appeal to users who enjoy a more substantial keystroke, providing a hearty depth that can feel more satisfying during typing. Thus, for those prioritizing speed and responsiveness, the EVA is the shorter and more suitable option, whereas the Matcha is better for individuals who prefer a deeper and more tactile experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EVA has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EVA for $2.99.
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When considering the sound profile of the HMX EVA linear switch, it is noted for its resonant sound signature, which likely provides a smooth auditory experience without the sharpness associated with more tactile or clacky switches. In contrast, the KTT Matcha tactile switch boasts a distinctly clacky sound, characterized by a crisp and bright auditory response that can enhance the typing experience, especially for those who appreciate a more percussive feedback. The Matcha’s clean bottom-out sound, attributed to its long pole stem, further distinguishes it by delivering an engaging auditory cue during every keystroke. While both switches have their unique sound qualities, the EVA caters to those preferring a smoother sound, whereas the Matcha aligns with users who enjoy more audible cues.
In terms of feel, the HMX EVA offers a silky smooth typing experience, ideal for those who favor linear switches that glide seamlessly without tactile interruptions. This can create a fluid typing rhythm, perfect for users who prioritize softness and ease of actuation during long sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Matcha tactile switch delivers a more nuanced experience with its comfortable and snappy feedback. It features a stepped tactile profile that provides a mild yet definite bump at the actuation point, enhancing the overall responsiveness. The blend of snappiness with a prominent amount of tactility allows for confident keystrokes but remains suitable for longer typing tasks without overwhelming the user. The Matcha further caters to a variety of typing preferences by incorporating an accented feel, striking a balance between solid tactile feedback and effortless actuation.
Ultimately, both the HMX EVA and KTT Matcha switches cater to different preferences in sound and feel. If you desire a smoother and more resonant sound, the EVA may be the perfect match, alongside a direct and fluid typing experience. Conversely, if you appreciate the auditory satisfaction of a clacky sound and a tactile feedback that enhances your engagement with each keystroke, the Matcha stands out. Your choice between these switches will depend on whether you prioritize a calm typing atmosphere with the EVA or an interactive experience with the Matcha. Either way, you can expect to enjoy a unique and satisfying typing experience based on your selected switch's characteristics.
Conclusion
To conclude, the decision between the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch ultimately hinges on your specific preferences and intended usage. If you prefer a smooth typing experience with a light bottom-out force, the EVA is an excellent choice, especially if you enjoy the unique aesthetic and sound signature inspired by Evangelion Unit-01. Its resonant sound can enhance your overall typing experience, making it ideal for those who type a lot or enjoy a more fluid keystroke. On the other hand, if you favor tactile feedback and responsiveness, the KTT Matcha is likely to suit you better. Its snappy tactility and distinct, clacky sound make it enjoyable for both typing and gaming sessions. If you find that you thrive on the sensation of tactile switches and appreciate the unique feel of a stepped design, the Matcha will deliver the comfort and nuanced feedback you seek. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your typing style and environment; whether you favor a quiet, smooth experience or a more dynamic and engaging tactile response will guide you in selecting the ideal switch for your mechanical keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
