United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT F2 vs. Bsun Hutt

An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT F2 and the Bsun Hutt offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The F2, a linear switch, stands out for its distinct hollow sound signature and medium-light weightiness, providing a comfortable typing experience with a lightly textured feel. On the other hand, the Hutt, a tactile switch, features a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, offering a more snappy and invigorating typing experience with a balanced sound profile. While the F2 is categorized as 'Feathery', 'Mild', 'Neutral', 'Subdued', and 'Subtle', the Hutt is described as 'Snappy', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', 'Accented', and 'Resonant'. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

49g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POK

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

20.5mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

The KTT F2 and the Bsun Hutt both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the relatively stiffer nature of polycarbonate. This material is known for its translucency, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, the bottom housing of the F2 is also made of polycarbonate, while the Hutt's bottom housing is constructed from nylon. Nylon is softer and absorbs more sound than polycarbonate, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This contrast in bottom housing materials may impact the overall sound and feel of the switches when typing.

In terms of sound production, the F2 and Hutt both utilize polycarbonate in their top housings, emphasizing clarity and resonance in the key press sound. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate contributes to a more defined sound profile. However, the nylon bottom housing in the Hutt offers a different acoustic experience, with a softer and more absorbing quality that creates a duller and rounder sound. This difference in material composition between the two switches' bottom housings may influence the tactile feedback and overall typing experience for users.

Overall, while both the KTT F2 and the Bsun Hutt share the use of polycarbonate in their top housings for similar sound characteristics, the choice of material for the bottom housing sets them apart. The F2's all-polycarbonate construction may result in a consistent sound and feel throughout the key press, while the Hutt's combination of polycarbonate and nylon could offer a varied experience with distinct characteristics at the top and bottom of the switch. These material differences highlight the importance of housing materials in determining the overall sound profile and typing feel of mechanical switches.

Weight

The KTT F2 linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch both offer a smooth typing experience, but they differ in terms of actuation and bottom out forces. The F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light switch. On the other hand, the Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, making it a lighter option. The F2 offers a slightly heavier typing experience compared to the lighter Hutt switch. For those who prefer a lighter typing feel, the Hutt switch would be the better option, as it requires less force to actuate and bottom out. However, for users who prefer a slightly more substantial typing experience, the F2 would be the ideal choice. Both switches offer a unique feel and can cater to different preferences, so the decision ultimately comes down to personal preference.

Travel distance

Both the KTT F2 linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch have a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making them equal in terms of the distance the switch travels from the top to the bottom. This means that when pressing down on a key with either of these switches, you will get similar results in terms of feeling the distance traveled. The similarity in travel distance indicates that both switches will provide a consistent typing experience in terms of key travel. Whether you choose the KTT F2 linear switch or the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, you can expect a similar distance traveled when pressing down on the keys.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.

The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT F2 linear switch offers a neutral and subdued sound profile, making it suitable for various settings without being too loud. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch provides a resonant and immersive auditory experience due to its higher-pitched sound profile. Both switches offer unique sound signatures that can enhance the typing experience, with the F2 providing a more subtle and dampened sound compared to the Hutt's clean and sharp sound profile.

When it comes to feel, the KTT F2 linear switch offers a feathery, mild, and subtle typing experience, with a lightly textured feel that adds tactile nuance to each keystroke. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offers a snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented tactile feel, providing a pronounced feedback with a firm actuation force. Both switches provide a comfortable typing experience, with the F2 being lighter and more gentle on the fingers while the Hutt offers a more lively and responsive feel.

Overall, the KTT F2 linear switch and Bsun Hutt tactile switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The F2 provides a comfortable typing experience with a neutral and subdued sound profile, while the Hutt offers a more immersive auditory experience with a higher-pitched sound. Depending on personal preferences for sound and feel, both switches can cater to different typing needs. It is important to consider factors such as keycaps and keyboard setup to fully appreciate the unique characteristics of each switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you are looking for a switch with a medium-light bottom out force and a distinct hollow sound signature, the KTT F2 linear switch would be a great choice for you. These switches offer a comfortable typing experience with a lightly textured feel on each keystroke, making them suitable for various typing tasks. On the other hand, if you prefer a light bottom out force and a tactile typing experience with a prominent tactile bump, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch would be the better option. These switches provide a balanced sound profile and a snappy, responsive feel, enhancing your typing experience. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel, sound profile, and bottom out force.

Mentioned in this article