Invyr Holy Panda vs. KTT Matcha
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Matcha switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options for tactile enthusiasts are the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Matcha. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. This switch offers pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance, making it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the KTT Matcha offers a comfortable and snappy tactility, with a clean bottom-out sound thanks to its long pole stem. While both switches are categorized as accented and snappy, they each offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Matcha, it is evident that both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housings. This choice of material leads to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile in both switches. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that incorporate RGB lighting, enhancing the overall aesthetic appeal. However, the Holy Panda features a nylon bottom housing, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer nature that absorbs more sound. In contrast, the Matcha opts for a polycarbonate bottom housing, maintaining consistency with its top housing and ensuring a consistent sound profile throughout the switch.
The difference in bottom housing material between the Holy Panda and the Matcha results in distinct sound characteristics when typing on these switches. The nylon bottom housing of the Holy Panda elicits a duller and rounder sound, contributing to a unique typing experience. On the other hand, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Matcha complements its top housing, creating a sharper and crisper sound profile. When pressing down on the switches, one will feel the qualities of the bottom housing, impacting the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the top housing material plays a significant role in the sound produced when releasing a key, providing additional nuances to the overall typing experience.
While both the Holy Panda and the Matcha feature polycarbonate top housings, their choice of bottom housing materials sets them apart in terms of sound profile. The Holy Panda's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound, contrasting with the crisper sound produced by the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Matcha. These differences in housing materials highlight the importance of considering both top and bottom housing materials in switch design to achieve desired sound characteristics. Ultimately, whether opting for the Holy Panda or the Matcha, users can expect a unique typing experience influenced by the combination of housing materials in each switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, it is evident that the Matcha switch is the lighter of the two. The Holy Panda has an actuation force of None grams, making it uncertain, while the Matcha has an actuation force of 40 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Holy Panda requires 67 grams, placing it in the medium-heavy category, whereas the Matcha only needs 45 grams, which is considered light. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Matcha switch, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke and bottom out. However, for individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing experience with a heavier push feel, the Holy Panda may be the preferred choice. Ultimately, selecting between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4mm. This means that when pressing down on a key with either switch, users can expect a consistent tactile response and feel, resulting in a similar typing experience. The travel distance of both switches being equal allows for a comfortable and familiar typing experience for users, with no noticeable difference in the distance traveled from the top to the bottom. Consequently, whether using the Holy Panda or the Matcha, users can expect a smooth and consistent typing experience with a travel distance of 4mm.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Holy Panda is well-known for its satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. The pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance of the Holy Panda create a unique and distinct sound that tactile switch enthusiasts appreciate. On the other hand, the Matcha is described as having a "clacky" sound, which is sharp and snappy, producing a crisp and percussive noise. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences, with the Holy Panda leaning towards a brighter and more pronounced clack, while the Matcha provides a sharp and snappy sound experience.
In terms of feel, the Holy Panda is characterized by sharp tactility, offering a pronounced feedback and a snappy, reactive feel. This immersive typing sensation is further enhanced by the moderate to firm actuation force of the switch. The Holy Panda is described as having an invigorating, sharp tactile feel that stands out among tactile switches. On the other hand, the Matcha is noted for its stepped tactility, providing a two-stage keystroke experience with a comfortable and snappy tactility. The Matcha also offers a feathery and subtle typing feel, making it light to press and suitable for extended typing sessions.
Overall, the Invyr Holy Panda and KTT Matcha tactile switches offer unique subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Holy Panda excels in providing a bright and pronounced clack sound with sharp tactility and immersive typing sensation. In contrast, the Matcha delivers a distinct clacky sound with a stepped tactility and feathery, subtle typing feel. Depending on personal preference and typing style, both switches present appealing options for tactile switch enthusiasts seeking a premium typing experience. Users can expect to achieve similar levels of satisfaction in sound and feel with either switch, each offering a unique and immersive typing experience in its own right.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Matcha tactile switch, consider your preference for keypress force and sound. If you enjoy a medium-heavy bottom out force and a sharp, clacky sound, the Holy Panda may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a clean, snappy sound, the Matcha could be more suitable. Additionally, if you appreciate a prominent, invigorating feel with a sharp and snappy tactile bump, the Holy Panda is a great option. However, if you prefer a more stepped, snappy feel with a feathery and subtle resistance, the Matcha might be the better fit. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the overall typing experience you are seeking.
Mentioned in this article
