Jerrzi Honey Bean vs. KTT Kang White
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Kang White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the KTT Kang White offer two distinct options for enthusiasts looking for a linear switch experience. The Honey Bean switches are favored for their light and linear action, as well as their silent operation, making them ideal for quiet environments such as offices. On the other hand, the Kang White switches stand out with their dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness due to their self-lubricating material. While the Honey Bean is characterized as easy-to-press and feathery, the Kang White is known for its low-pitched and neutral feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Honey Bean and KTT Kang White both have distinctive housing materials that contribute to their unique sound profiles. The Honey Bean utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housings, resulting in a deeper and more muted sound overall. In contrast, the Kang White features a polycarbonate top housing and a nylon bottom housing. The polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper, higher-pitched sound, especially suitable for RGB lighting, while the nylon bottom housing offers a fuller and rounder sound. This difference in housing materials creates contrasting typing experiences for users of each switch.
While the top housing materials of the Honey Bean and Kang White are different, they both provide unique characteristics to the sound profile of the switches. The POM top housing of the Honey Bean creates a pleasing sound with a deeper tone, while the polycarbonate top housing of the Kang White produces a crisper and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate allows for RGB lighting effects, adding an aesthetic feature to the Kang White switch. These differences in top housing materials showcase how the overall typing experience can be influenced by subtle variations in switch construction.
When considering the impact of housing materials on the typing experience, it is important to note how the bottom and top housings of a switch interact. The qualities of the bottom housing material are more pronounced when pressing down on a key, affecting the bottom-out sound and feel. Meanwhile, the top housing material has a greater impact on the sound when releasing a key. In the case of the Honey Bean and Kang White, the contrasting materials used for their top and bottom housings result in distinct typing experiences for users. Ultimately, the choice between POM and polycarbonate or nylon for switch housing materials can significantly influence the overall sound profile and feel of a mechanical keyboard switch.
Weight
In comparing the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the KTT Kang White linear switch, we can see a difference in their actuation and bottom out forces. The Honey Bean has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams, while the Kang White has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Honey Bean's bottom out force is unknown, while the Kang White has a bottom out force of 58 grams, which is considered medium. This means that the Honey Bean may provide a lighter typing experience overall, while the Kang White may offer a more substantial push feel. This difference in force may cater to different preferences, with the lighter force being more suitable for longer typing sessions, and the heavier force providing a more tactile typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on individual typing preferences.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. The Honey Bean has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Kang White. The shorter travel distance of the Honey Bean switch may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the slightly longer travel distance of the Kang White switch may provide a more substantial and deliberate key press. Both switches offer a different feel and response based on their travel distance, allowing users to choose the one that best suits their preferences for keyboard usage.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Honey Bean has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Honey Bean for $3.59.
The KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch offers a muted typing experience, producing a softer and quieter sound ideal for shared environments like offices. On the other hand, the KTT Kang White linear switch provides a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, with a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. Depending on personal preference, the Honey Bean can offer a more discreet typing experience while the Kang White might be preferred for those who enjoy a more pronounced keyboard sound.
When it comes to feel, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch is known for its easy-to-press and feathery qualities, requiring minimal force to activate and offering a gentle typing experience. This can reduce finger fatigue during long typing sessions and provide a responsive and low-impact feel. Unfortunately, information on the tactile feel of the KTT Kang White switch is not available, so it may be advisable to try them out first-hand to determine if they offer a similar typing experience to the Honey Bean.
Overall, if you are looking for a linear switch that prioritizes a muted sound and easy-to-press feel, the Jerrzi Honey Bean switch would be an excellent choice. Alternatively, if you prefer a switch with a low-pitched sound and self-lubricating smoothness, the KTT Kang White switch may be more to your liking. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to personal preference for sound, feel, and typing experience.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when considering whether to choose the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch or the KTT Kang White linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your preferences and typing environment. If you value a silent and light typing experience, perfect for office settings or shared spaces, then the Honey Bean switch with its gentle and linear action would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a more tactile and smooth typing experience with a delightful typing sound, the Kang White switch offers a unique and satisfying feel. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches depends on whether you prioritize silent operation and light actuation force or a more engaging tactile experience and smooth keystrokes.
Mentioned in this article
