Bsun Hutt vs. Cherry MX Orange
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the Cherry MX Orange switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the choice between tactile and linear options can dramatically influence your typing experience, and two noteworthy contenders in this realm are the Bsun Hutt and the Cherry MX Orange. The Bsun Hutt switch stands out with its medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, providing a "snappy" and "invigorating" feel that many typists find enjoyable. Its balanced sound profile adds an extra layer of satisfaction, making it ideal for those who thrive on feedback during their keystrokes. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange switch offers a linear feel that is smoother and more consistent without the tactile feedback, making it suitable for gamers and typists who prefer a quieter experience. This reissued switch, enhanced with MX2A generation improvements, meets the high demand for a reliable, silent operation. Both switches cater to different preferences and typing styles, leaving users to weigh tactile engagement against smooth performance. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and Cherry MX Orange switches exhibit notable differences in their housing materials, particularly in their top components. The Bsun Hutt utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which contributes to a sound profile that is sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound produced when typing, making it an ideal choice for users who prioritize auditory feedback and a bright sound. This material is particularly advantageous for those who enjoy RGB lighting, as its translucence allows for effective light diffusion. In contrast, the Cherry MX Orange features a nylon top housing, which offers a decidedly different auditory experience. Nylon, being a softer plastic, produces a deeper, fuller sound that is characterized by its ability to absorb sound rather than amplify it. As a result, the MX Orange delivers a rounder, more muted sound that caters to users who prefer a more subdued typing experience.
In terms of bottom housing, both the Bsun Hutt and Cherry MX Orange utilize nylon, which is a classic choice for mechanical switch applications. This similarity means that when it comes to the bottom housing, users can expect a consistent auditory profile. Both switches share the same deeper and fuller sound qualities thanks to the nylon material, which softens the impact of keystrokes and lends a more tactile feel to typing. The dual use of nylon in the bottom housings of both switches emphasizes its effectiveness in sound absorption, creating a satisfying typing experience that is less jarring compared to stiffer materials. Therefore, while the Bsun Hutt offers a unique sound profile from its polycarbonate top housing, the shared nylon bottom housing contributes to a uniform depth of sound across both switches.
Overall, the contrasting top housing materials of the Bsun Hutt and Cherry MX Orange lead to divergent sound characteristics, while their use of nylon in the bottom housing helps to unify their overall auditory experience. When evaluating both switches, it becomes evident that the Bsun Hutt's polycarbonate top housing generates a brighter, more resonant sound, ideal for users who prefer an audible click with brighter RGB illumination. Conversely, the MX Orange's nylon top housing provides a softer, rounder auditory feedback, catering to users who appreciate a more muted and comfortable typing experience. However, regardless of the differences in the top housings, the nylon bottom helps produce a similarly enjoyable typing experience, ensuring users still benefit from a rich, full sound with each keystroke.
Weight
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch differ noticeably in their actuation forces, impacting their overall feel during typing or gaming. The Hutt switch has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams compared to the heavier 55 grams required by the MX Orange. This lighter force of the Hutt switch makes it ideal for users seeking extended typing sessions or gaming marathons, as it requires less effort to actuate each key. In terms of bottom out force, the Hutt switch also has a defined bottom out force of 49 grams, while the Cherry MX Orange lacks a specified bottom out force, which makes it difficult to compare directly in that aspect. Overall, for those who prefer a more substantial typing experience, the Cherry MX Orange would be the better choice due to its heavier actuation force, while the Bsun Hutt offers a lighter feel that may be more comfortable for prolonged use.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch, a noticeable difference emerges: the Hutt has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the MX Orange measures 4 mm. In this case, those who prefer responsive keystrokes may lean towards the Hutt switch, as its shorter travel distance could facilitate quicker action—a characteristic often favored by gamers. Conversely, the MX Orange's longer travel distance provides a more pronounced feel and depth that some users find satisfying. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches boils down to personal preference, with the Hutt offering a slight edge in responsiveness and the MX Orange delivering a more traditional and substantial typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The Cherry MX Orange has an MSRP of $4.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Orange for $3.89.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Bsun Hutt switch stands out with a clean, resonant profile that produces a higher-pitched auditory experience while typing. The sharpness and clarity of the sound can enhance the overall typing experience, creating a satisfying feedback loop for users who appreciate the acoustic aspect of keyboards. Comparatively, the Cherry MX Orange switch does not have a defined sound description provided, making it difficult to accurately compare; however, sound characteristics can also be influenced by external factors like the choice of keyboard and keycaps, which may lead to certain similarities or differences in overall auditory feedback.
When it comes to feel, the Hutt switch excels with its multitude of positive qualities. It is snappy and responsive, making each keystroke feel alive. The pronounced tactile bump adds a distinct sharpness that provides high feedback intensity, allowing for a noticeable reaction with every press. This invigorating sensation, coupled with the well-balanced actuation force, creates an immersive typing atmosphere that many users cherish. The Cherry MX Orange switch lacks specific descriptors in this area, which means a direct comparison on tactile feel is missing. Nevertheless, one can expect the Hutt's detailed tactile feedback to provide a memorable typing experience that may not be present in the MX Orange.
Overall, the Bsun Hutt switch presents a compelling choice for those who prioritize auditory and tactile experiences in their typing. Its resonant sound and invigorating feel, characterized as snappy and sharply tactile, make it a well-rounded option for enthusiasts seeking an enjoyable engagement with their keyboards. In contrast, while the tactile experience of the Cherry MX Orange is less defined, its historical significance and enhancements may appeal to those who prefer a more traditional or subtle typing experience. A user could expect enjoyable outcomes from either switch, depending on their typing preferences and the combination of components used in their keyboard setup.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Cherry MX Orange linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you appreciate a tactile feedback experience that enhances your typing, the Bsun Hutt is an excellent option. Its prominent tactile bump, coupled with a snappy and invigorating feel, makes it a fantastic choice for both typing and gaming, particularly if you enjoy the resonance of each keystroke. The 49-gram bottom out force gives it a light touch, allowing for quick and responsive typing that could invigorate your workflow. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, linear experience without tactile feedback, you would likely find the Cherry MX Orange to be more suitable. Although specific information on its bottom out force is unavailable, its design focuses on high responsiveness and enhanced multi-functional performance which is ideal for both gaming and general use. Therefore, if you want a switch that feels smooth and provides an optimal platform for rapid key presses, the Cherry MX Orange would serve you well. Ultimately, your choice should reflect whether you value tactile responsiveness or linear smoothness in your keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
