Bsun Hutt vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Bsun Hutt and KTT Phalaenopsis are two options that stand out for their unique features. The Hutt switch offers a medium-heavy spring and a pronounced tactile bump, creating a distinct typing experience that is both engaging and satisfying. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis switch boasts a light actuation force of 37g, reducing finger fatigue during long typing sessions while still providing a noticeable tactile bump at 50g. The Hutt switch is known for its snappy, invigorating, sharp, accented, resonant characteristics, while the Phalaenopsis is described as bassy, stepped, thocky. Both switches have their strengths, with the Hutt excelling in tactile feedback and sound profile, and the Phalaenopsis offering a lighter touch and reduced fatigue. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and KTT Phalaenopsis both feature polycarbonate top housings, which result in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which enhances the resonant quality of the sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that utilize RGB lighting, as it allows the light to shine through the housing. However, the Bsun Hutt's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the KTT Phalaenopsis's polycarbonate bottom housing. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound, resulting in a rounder and duller tone.
In terms of aesthetics, both the Bsun Hutt and KTT Phalaenopsis offer a clear housing material, indicating the use of polycarbonate in their top housings. This not only allows for RGB lighting effects but also contributes to a sleek and modern look. The differences arise when comparing the bottom housing materials, with the Bsun Hutt using nylon for a deeper sound profile, while the KTT Phalaenopsis sticks with polycarbonate for a sharper and crisper sound. This showcases how the choice of housing material can significantly impact the overall sound and feel of a switch.
When it comes to the overall typing experience, the choice of top and bottom housing materials in switches like the Bsun Hutt and KTT Phalaenopsis plays a crucial role. The bottom housing dictates the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on a key, with nylon providing a deeper tone compared to polycarbonate. On the other hand, the top housing is more influential when releasing a key, with polycarbonate offering a sharper and clearer sound profile. Understanding the impact of different housing materials on switch performance can help users make informed decisions based on their preferences for sound and feel.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it is evident that both switches are on the lighter side in terms of force required. The Hutt has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, while the Phalaenopsis has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Phalaenopsis has a slightly lighter actuation force but requires a slightly heavier force to bottom out compared to the Hutt. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Phalaenopsis would be the better choice, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke. However, for those who prefer a more substantial typing feel, the Hutt may be more suitable due to its slightly heavier bottom out force. Overall, both switches offer a relatively light typing experience, making them ideal for extended typing or gaming sessions.
Travel distance
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Phalaenopsis has a longer travel distance compared to the Hutt. The Hutt falls into the category of shorter travel distances, which are preferred by gamers for faster response times, while the Phalaenopsis offers a slightly deeper feel when pressing down on the key. Both switches provide a tactile feedback, but the difference in travel distance can affect the overall typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the desired typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Bsun Hutt switch is known for its resonant and immersive auditory experience, providing a clean and sharp sound profile during typing sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch offers a bassy sound profile with a deeper and richer tone akin to bass tones, along with a satisfying thocky sound that is both deep and rich. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles, with the Hutt providing a higher-pitched resonance while the Phalaenopsis delivers a deep and rich bassy sound.
When it comes to feel, the Bsun Hutt switch is described as snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented, offering a responsive and immersive typing sensation with a strong and crisp tactile bump. In comparison, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch is characterized as stepped, providing a tactile feel that is more mild in comparison to a hypertactile switch, with distinct pre-travel and post-travel stages. Both switches offer unique tactile feedback, with the Hutt switch delivering a more intense tactile bump while the Phalaenopsis switch offering a gentler tactile experience with its stepped design.
Overall, the Bsun Hutt switch provides a more resonant sound profile and a sharper tactile feel with its pronounced feedback and strong tactile bump, creating an invigorating typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch offers a bassy sound profile and a more mild tactile feel with its stepped design, providing effortless typing with minimal finger fatigue. Depending on individual preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences, ensuring an enjoyable and satisfying typing experience for newcomers looking to explore mechanical keyboard switches.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the Bsun Hutt tactile switch or the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and typing style. If you value a medium-heavy spring with a distinct tactile bump and balanced sound profile, the Bsun Hutt switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter actuation force with a beautiful translucent design that minimizes finger fatigue during long typing sessions, along with a satisfying tactile bump and deeper, richer sound profile, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch may be more suitable for your needs. Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences, so take into account your typing habits and preferences before making your decision. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on what features matter most to you in your mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
