Bsun Hutt vs. Bsun Taichi
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the Bsun Taichi switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, the Bsun Hutt and Bsun Taichi present two distinct yet appealing options, catering to different typing preferences. The Bsun Hutt, a tactile switch, features a medium-heavy spring and a prominent tactile bump, resulting in a snappy and invigorating typing experience with a balanced sound profile. This makes the Hutt ideal for users who enjoy the tactile feedback of each keystroke, which can enhance typing accuracy and satisfaction. On the other hand, the Bsun Taichi, classified as a linear switch, offers a smooth and uninterrupted keystroke thanks to its long-pole stem and extended springs, delivering a unique high-pitched bottom-out sound that many gamers and typists find mesmerizing. Its design promotes a fluid typing experience, which can be beneficial for those who favor quick and silent key presses without any tactile resistance. While both switches cater to different preferences—tactile feedback versus smoothness—it's essential to consider your own typing style and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that fits you perfectly.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
21mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and Bsun Taichi both feature polycarbonate top housings, which results in a similar auditory and visual experience for users. Polycarbonate is known for its stiffer structure, contributing to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile when typing. This material's translucency enhances the aesthetic appeal of the switches, particularly when RGB lighting is utilized, as it allows light to pass through in a vivid and vibrant manner. The uniformity in using polycarbonate for the top housing in both switches not only guarantees a clear and resonant sound but also ensures that users will enjoy a visually striking display when the keys are illuminated. As such, the auditory experience derived from the top housing will be consistent across both the Hutt and Taichi models, satisfying users looking for clarity and brightness in their keystrokes.
On the other hand, both the Hutt and Taichi utilize nylon for their bottom housings, providing a contrasting auditory experience compared to the polycarbonate top. Nylon is renowned for its softer characteristics, which absorb sound effectively, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This absorption adds a certain richness to the typing experience, dampening the higher frequencies produced by the polycarbonate top housing. As such, users will benefit from a well-rounded sound profile that signifies the cushion provided by the nylon bottom. This pairing of materials allows for a unique duality in sound: the crispness of the top and the roundness of the bottom. With both switch models employing nylon for the bottom housing, the overall typing experience will feel coherent and satisfying for users.
By employing polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing, the Bsun Hutt and Bsun Taichi create a seamless coherence in sound quality and tactile feedback. Though different in material and acoustic properties, the combination of these two materials aligns persistently in delivering a full auditory spectrum. The typical user experience, comprising both the crispness derived from the top and the depth from the bottom, remains consistent across both models. Therefore, while there are notable contrasts in material properties, the dual-material design ensures that both switches yield remarkably similar results, pleasing keyboard enthusiasts who value diverse sound profiles and aesthetics in their typing instruments.
Weight
When comparing the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Bsun Taichi linear switch, both models exhibit the same actuation force of 40 grams, making them equally light in achieving a keystroke. This similar actuation force suggests that users can expect a comparable typing experience in terms of the effort required to register a key press, which may be ideal for those who type for extended periods or engage in long gaming sessions. However, the key difference arises with their bottom out forces; the Hutt has a bottom out force of 49 grams, while the bottom out force for the Taichi is unavailable. This means that the Hutt offers a slightly heavier feel when the key is fully depressed, providing users with a more substantial tactile experience. While the Taichi's bottom out characteristics are unknown, the Hutt's heavier bottom out force may appeal to individuals seeking a firmer response when bottoming out. Therefore, for those preferring a lighter overall typing experience, both switches meet that criterion at the actuation stage, but for those valuing a heavier tactile sensation upon bottoming out, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch would be the better choice.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Bsun Taichi linear switch, the Hutt offers a travel distance of 3.5 mm while the Taichi features a slightly longer travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that the Taichi switch allows for a marginally deeper keystroke, which may appeal to users who prefer a more substantial feel when typing or gaming, as it provides that extra tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Hutt's shorter travel distance could be advantageous for gamers seeking quicker response times and more rapid key presses. Overall, if you prioritize a more responsive experience, the Hutt's 3.5 mm travel could be preferable. Conversely, if you favor a deeper key engagement, the Taichi's 3.6 mm travel distance may be the better choice.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The Bsun Taichi has an MSRP of $2.75 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taichi for $2.25.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Bsun Hutt switch stands out with its resonant auditory profile, providing a higher-pitched and immersive typing experience that is both clean and sharp. This makes the Hutt an engaging choice for those who appreciate auditory feedback while typing. In contrast, the Bsun Taichi switch is characterized by an enchanting high-pitched bottom-out sound, thanks to its long-pole stem and extended springs. While both switches exhibit high frequency in their sound profiles, the specifics of the Taichi's acoustic signature seem to offer a distinct clarity, contributing to a different auditory experience compared to the Hutt.
In terms of feel, the Hutt switch excels with its snappy and invigorating characteristics, providing pronounced feedback with each keystroke. Its medium-heavy spring and sharp tactile bump ensure a responsive and immersive typing sensation, making each press feel alive and deliberate. The tactile feedback is accentuated, delivering a strong, crisp impulse right at the actuation point. On the other hand, details on the tactile sensation of the Taichi switch are not outlined; thus, we cannot make a direct comparison in this aspect. However, given the construction features of the Taichi, we might anticipate a smooth typing experience due to its design aimed at enhancing stability.
In conclusion, both the Bsun Hutt and Taichi switches bring unique qualities to the typing experience, appealing to different preferences in sound and feel. The Hutt's resonant tone and sharp tactile feedback create a lively and enjoyable environment for typists, particularly those who favor a more tactile switch. Meanwhile, the Taichi’s high-pitched sound profile suggests an auditory delight, and its design may hint at smoothness in feel, although specifics are lacking. Ultimately, the choice between the two will hinge on audio preferences and the desired tactile feedback during typing.
Conclusion
To conclude, when choosing between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Bsun Taichi linear switch, your personal preferences and typing style will play a significant role. If you appreciate a responsive and dynamic typing experience, the Hutt switch could be your ideal match. With its light actuation force of 49 grams, prominent tactile bump, and snappy characteristics, it offers a tactile sensation that's invigorating and sharp, making it great for both typing and gaming. You'll enjoy a resonant sound profile that enhances your interaction with the keyboard while providing a balanced auditory experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, more silent experience without the tactile feedback, the Taichi switch is worth considering. Known for its unparalleled smoothness and high-pitched bottom-out sound, it's designed for those who long for a seamless keystroke experience. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you favor the tactile feedback of the Hutt switch or the smoothness of the Taichi, both of which have unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences.
Mentioned in this article
