Bsun Hutt vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion
An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When looking at mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the Bsun Hutt, a tactile switch, and the Wuque Studio WS Onion, a linear switch. The Hutt switch stands out for its medium-heavy spring and prominent tactile bump, providing a satisfying typing experience with a balanced sound profile. On the other hand, the WS Onion offers a buttery smooth keystroke feel with its polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, giving users a crisp and responsive typing experience with a neutral sound profile. Each switch offers unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
49g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Spring
WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring
Housing materials
The Bsun Hutt and the Wuque Studio WS Onion both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the material's stiffness. This results in a more clear and resonant sound when typing on these switches. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially useful for switches that utilize RGB lighting, as it allows the lighting to shine through the housing. This similarity in housing material suggests that users can expect a consistent sound and feel when typing on either the Hutt or the WS Onion.
While both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housings, the Bsun Hutt and the Wuque Studio WS Onion differ in their choice of bottom housing material. The Hutt features a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the WS Onion also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, offering a similar deep and full sound experience. This consistency in bottom housing material between the two switches suggests that users can expect a comparable typing experience in terms of sound and feel when using either the Hutt or the WS Onion.
When considering the split between the top and bottom housing materials of the Bsun Hutt and the Wuque Studio WS Onion, it is important to note the impact each material has on the typing experience. The qualities of the bottom housing will influence the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch when pressed down, while the top housing will affect the sound when releasing a key. This split showcases how the choice of housing materials can impact different aspects of the typing experience, and users of both the Hutt and the WS Onion can appreciate the attention to detail in providing a well-rounded sound profile.
Weight
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch have different actuation and bottom out forces, making them suitable for different preferences. The Hutt has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 49 grams, providing a light and easy typing experience. In contrast, the WS Onion has an unknown actuation force and a heavier bottom out force of 63.5 grams, giving a more substantial and tactile typing feel. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Hutt for longer typing sessions, while individuals who enjoy a stronger push may lean towards the WS Onion for a more pronounced typing experience. In terms of weight, the Hutt is lighter overall compared to the WS Onion, making it a better choice for those looking for a lighter switch option.
Travel distance
The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the WS Onion has the longer travel distance compared to the Hutt. The 0.5 mm may not seem like a significant difference, but it can impact the typing or gaming experience. The shorter travel distance of the Hutt may provide a quicker response time, which is preferred by gamers seeking faster reactions. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the WS Onion may appeal to those who prefer a more substantial feel when pressing down on the key. Both switches offer unique experiences based on their travel distances, so the choice ultimately depends on personal preference and what the user values in a switch.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is described as resonant, offering a higher-pitched and clean sound profile that can enhance the typing experience. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch is known for its neutral sound profile, making it suitable for a wide range of users and environments. Both switches provide different auditory experiences, with the Hutt offering a more immersive sound and the WS Onion delivering a more balanced and versatile sound.
In terms of feel, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is characterized by its snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented properties, providing a tactile typing sensation with pronounced feedback and a distinct tactile bump. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch offers a buttery and polished feel, ensuring a smooth and effortless keystroke experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. While the Hutt switch focuses on providing a lively and reactive typing feel, the WS Onion switch aims to offer a seamless and refined typing experience.
Overall, if you are looking for a switch with a prominent tactile bump and a resonant sound, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and buttery keystroke feel with a neutral sound profile, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch would be a perfect fit. Each switch offers unique qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles, ensuring a personalized and satisfying typing experience for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Bsun Hutt tactile switch or the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prefer a light bottom out force and enjoy a pronounced tactile bump with a resonant sound profile, then the Hutt switch may be the better option for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force with a buttery smooth keystroke feel and a neutral sound profile, then the WS Onion switch might be more suited to your preferences. Remember to consider factors such as sound, feel, and actuation force when making your decision. Ultimately, both switches offer unique typing experiences, so choose the one that aligns best with your typing preferences.
Mentioned in this article
