TTC Iron vs. KTT Mannan Pipefish
An in-depth look at the TTC Iron and the KTT Mannan Pipefish switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the TTC Iron and the KTT Mannan Pipefish both offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The TTC Iron is a linear switch that is highly regarded for its pronounced clacky sound signature, making each keystroke a satisfying experience. With its swift actuation and buttery smooth travel, it is perfect for users who value precision and enjoyment in their typing sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish, also a linear switch, boasts effortless and enjoyable typing with its smooth linear action and light 45g actuation force. Ideal for casual typists looking for a strain-free keyboarding journey, this switch provides a comfortable and precise typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
41g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
The TTC Iron and the KTT Mannan Pipefish both have unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The Iron uses POM for both the top and bottom housing, resulting in a pleasing and deeper sound. On the other hand, the Mannan Pipefish utilizes polycarbonate for the top housing, creating a sharper and crisper sound. This difference in materials leads to distinct sound characteristics, with the POM housing of the Iron being more muted compared to the polycarbonate housing of the Mannan Pipefish.
In terms of aesthetics, the choice of housing material also plays a role. The translucent nature of polycarbonate used in the Mannan Pipefish's top housing makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. This allows for a visually appealing effect when using the keyboard with lights on. In contrast, the POM housing of the Iron may not have the same visual impact but still delivers a unique sound profile that some users may prefer for a quieter typing experience.
While both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials, the choice between POM and polycarbonate ultimately comes down to personal preference. The softer nylon bottom housing of the Mannan Pipefish creates a deeper and fuller sound, contrasting with the deeper yet more muted sound of the POM bottom housing of the Iron. Users looking for a softer and rounder sound may lean towards switches with a nylon bottom housing, while those seeking a sharper and crisper sound may prefer switches with a polycarbonate top housing like the Mannan Pipefish.
Weight
Both the TTC Iron linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch are considered light switches in terms of actuation force and bottom out force. The Iron has an actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Mannan Pipefish has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. This makes the Mannan Pipefish slightly lighter in terms of actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Iron. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, either of these switches would be a good choice. However, if someone prefers a slightly heavier feel, they may lean towards the Iron switch due to its slightly higher actuation and bottom out forces. Ultimately, both switches offer a light typing experience, making them suitable for those who prefer less resistance while typing.
Since both switches fall within the light category in terms of actuation force and bottom out force, users can expect similar results in terms of typing experience when using either the TTC Iron linear switch or the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch.
Travel distance
The TTC Iron linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In terms of travel distance, the Mannan Pipefish has a slightly longer distance compared to the Iron. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances which are becoming increasingly popular, especially among gamers seeking faster response times. However, for those who prefer a more substantial feel when typing, the Mannan Pipefish may be the preferred option due to its slightly longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance and typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Iron has an MSRP of $5.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iron for $4.30.
The KTT Mannan Pipefish has an MSRP of $3.53 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mannan Pipefish for $3.05.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the TTC Iron linear switch is best described as clacky, providing a sharp and snappy sound with each press. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch offers a more neutral sound profile, suitable for various typing environments. The sound produced by both switches can further be influenced by factors like the keyboard's construction and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the TTC Iron switch is known for being easy-to-press, offering gentle resistance and requiring minimal force for activation. This results in an effortless typing experience that reduces finger fatigue during long typing sessions. The Mannan Pipefish switch also falls under the category of easy-to-press, providing a light actuation force and a comfortable typing feel. Additionally, the Mannan Pipefish switch is described as polished, giving a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel.
Considering the available information, the TTC Iron linear switch stands out for its clacky sound and easy-to-press feel, making it a great choice for enthusiasts looking for a distinct typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch offers a more neutral sound and a comfortable typing feel, making it suitable for casual typists seeking a strain-free typing journey. Ultimately, both switches provide unique qualities that cater to different preferences, so the decision between them would depend on the individual's specific typing needs and preferences.
Conclusion
In summarizing the key points of choosing between the TTC Iron linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, consider your preferences and typing style. If you prioritize a distinct and satisfying clacky sound with a light actuation force, the TTC Iron switch is a great choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and comfortable typing experience with a slightly lighter actuation force, the KTT Mannan Pipefish switch might be more suitable for you. Both switches offer different characteristics in terms of sound and feel, so take into account what aspects of typing are most important to you when making your decision. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches comes down to personal preference and the typing experience you are looking to achieve.
Mentioned in this article
