KTT Kang White vs. Outemu Lotus
An in-depth look at the KTT Kang White and the Outemu Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Kang White and the Outemu Lotus both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Kang White, a linear switch, is lauded for its exquisite representation of a linear switch with a dazzling typing sound and unparalleled smoothness due to its self-lubricating material. Categorized as 'Low-pitched' and 'Neutral', the Kang White is a popular choice for those who prioritize a satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Lotus, also a linear switch, does not have any standout characteristics mentioned. This may appeal to those who prefer a more subtle and understated typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
35g
Bottom-out force
58g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.30 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Kang White and the Outemu Lotus, it is evident that both switches feature a nylon bottom housing. This means that when typing on either switch, users can expect a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon which absorbs more sound. However, while the Kang White utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, the Lotus features a nylon top housing. The polycarbonate top housing of the Kang White results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, ideal for those who prefer a more clear and resonant sound. On the other hand, the nylon top housing of the Lotus contributes to a duller and rounder sound, showcasing a different sound profile compared to the Kang White.
Despite the differences in the top housing material, both the KTT Kang White and the Outemu Lotus share similar characteristics in their nylon bottom housing. This indicates that users can expect a consistent experience of a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing on either switch. However, the choice between the polycarbonate top housing of the Kang White and the nylon top housing of the Lotus can significantly impact the overall sound experience. Those who prefer a sharper and crisper sound may lean towards the Kang White, while individuals seeking a duller and rounder sound might opt for the Lotus.
In terms of functionality, the bottom housing material plays a crucial role in the bottom-out sound and feel of a switch, while the top housing material impacts the sound when releasing a key. Therefore, users can feel the qualities of the nylon bottom housing when pressing down on either the Kang White or the Lotus, experiencing a deeper and fuller sound profile. However, the differences in the top housing material between the two switches will influence the sound output when letting go of a key, providing users with distinct sound profiles to choose from based on their preferences.
Weight
Comparing the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, the actuation force and bottom out force differ between the two. The Kang White has a medium actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, providing a balanced typing experience. On the other hand, the Lotus has a lighter actuation force of 35 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a lighter option overall. The Kang White offers a slightly heavier typing feel compared to the Lotus, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience. However, those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing or gaming sessions may find the Lotus more suitable. In both cases, users can expect consistent and reliable performance from these switches when it comes to actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The KTT Kang White linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Outemu Lotus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.3 mm. This means that the Lotus has a shorter travel distance compared to the Kang White. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Kang White being slightly on the longer side. Gamers may prefer the Lotus switch for its faster response time due to the shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial keypress may opt for the Kang White. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT Kang White comes in at $1.99, whereas the Outemu Lotus comes in at $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Kang White linear switch is known for its low-pitched and neutral profile, offering a pleasing bass-heavy and mellow tone during typing. On the other hand, information on the sound profile of the Outemu Lotus linear switch is unavailable. The sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.
In regards to feel, specific details about the typing experience on the Kang White switch are not provided. Similarly, there is no information available on the tactile experience of typing on the Outemu Lotus linear switch. It is important to note that the feel of a switch is a critical factor in determining user preference and typing comfort.
Overall, while the Kang White switch stands out for its smooth typing experience and pleasing sound qualities, the information on the Outemu Lotus switch is limited. Without details on the feel and sound of the Lotus switch, it is difficult to make a direct comparison between the two. However, based on the available information, it is likely that both switches could provide similar results in terms of performance. It is recommended for newcomers to try out both switches in person to determine which one best suits their typing preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT Kang White linear switch and the Outemu Lotus linear switch, consider your preferences for typing force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a medium bottom out force and enjoy a low-pitched, smooth typing experience, the Kang White may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and are not particular about sound and feel, the Lotus switch could be the more suitable option. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and what characteristics are most important to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
