KTT Matcha vs. Huano Sakura

Overview

When exploring the world of mechanical keyboard switches, two popular choices that stand out are the KTT Matcha, a tactile switch, and the Huano Sakura, a linear switch. The KTT Matcha is lauded for its comfortable and responsive tactile feedback, which provides a satisfying typing experience characterized by a snappy actuation and a distinctively clean bottom-out sound, thanks to its long pole stem. Ideal for typists who appreciate a tangible cue with each keystroke, the Matcha is perfect for those who revel in a lively, clacky sound alongside its tactile feel. On the other hand, the Huano Sakura offers a completely different experience with its feather-light actuation and medium acoustics, making it an excellent choice for gamers and typists who prefer a smooth keystroke without the distraction of tactile bumps. While both switches cater to different preferences—one emphasizing tactile feedback and the other prioritizing a smooth, linear touch—they each have unique strengths that make them appealing for different types of users. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the optimal switch for your needs.

By the numbers

KTT Matcha Tactile

Huano Sakura Linear

$5.20

$4.88 per 10

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The KTT Matcha and the Huano Sakura switches display a noticeable contrast in their housing materials, particularly in their top housings, which contributes significantly to their acoustic profiles. The Matcha’s top housing is made from polycarbonate, a material known for its rigidity and translucency, which results in a clear and resonant sound profile. This sharp sound quality is especially enhanced when RGB lighting is used, as the polycarbonate allows light to pass through effectively. In comparison, the Sakura’s top housing is constructed from POK (polyketone), which, while offering durability and a low coefficient of friction for a smoother feel, does not provide the same high-pitched clarity. Instead, the POK material emphasizes a different auditory experience, leaning more towards a smooth and clacky response. Thus, while both switches are designed for optimal performance, the materials suggest distinct audio characteristics rooted in their individual properties.

When considering the bottom housings of both the Matcha and Sakura switches, another layer of differentiation arises. The Matcha’s bottom housing remains polycarbonate, mirroring the rigid and crisp sound it offers in its top housing. In contrast, the Sakura showcases nylon as its bottom housing material, which traditionally contributes to a deeper, fuller sound profile due to its softer nature. This leads to a more pronounced absorption of sound, making the Sakura switches feel rounder and less sharp than those of the Matcha. Since the qualities of the bottom housing significantly influence the bottom-out sound and feel, this distinction highlights how each type of plastic influences the overall experience. Users can expect a snappier engagement from the Matcha, whereas the Sakura provides a smoother and softer disengagement.

Ultimately, while the KTT Matcha switches are characterized by their sharper acoustics due to uniform polycarbonate housing in both top and bottom sections, the Huano Sakura presents a more nuanced experience with its combination of POK and nylon materials. The differing materials contribute to distinct sound profiles and tactile sensations users will experience when typing. Importantly, if users desire a varied auditory experience similar to what the Matcha provides, they can still achieve a crisp sound quality by ensuring their typing technique and switch configuration complement the housing's inherent characteristics. In sum, understanding the material differences and their impact on sound and tactile feedback is vital for enthusiasts looking to tailor their keyboard experience to their preferences.

Weight

When comparing the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Huano Sakura linear switch, both exhibit light weights but differ in their actuation forces. The Matcha requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 40 grams, while the Sakura has a lighter actuation force of 35 grams. Interestingly, both switches share the same bottom out force of 45 grams, meaning that once fully pressed down, the experience remains consistent regardless of the switch used. This similarity in bottom out force allows users to expect similar tactile feedback when the key is fully depressed. For those who favor a lighter touch, the Sakura would be the preferable choice, as its lower actuation force may facilitate longer typing or gaming sessions with less finger fatigue. Conversely, the Matcha’s slightly heavier actuation may appeal to users looking for a more substantial feel in their keystrokes.

Travel distance

The KTT Matcha tactile switch features a travel distance of 4.0 mm, while the Huano Sakura linear switch offers a slightly shorter distance of 3.6 mm. This difference means that if you're looking for a switch that provides a more substantial feel when pressed, the Matcha switch is the better choice, catering to those who appreciate a hearty depth in their key presses. On the other hand, the Sakura switch, with its shorter travel distance, may appeal more to gamers or users seeking quicker response times, as it allows for faster actuation. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on personal preference: if you favor a more traditional and pronounced press, the Matcha is preferable, while the Sakura is suited for those who appreciate a more streamlined and rapid action.

Price comparison

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT Matcha switch produces a distinctly clacky noise characterized by a sharp and snappy tone when pressed. This crisp and bright auditory feedback enhances the tactile experience, making it satisfying for users who enjoy a percussive typing rhythm. On the other hand, the Huano Sakura switch is noted for its medium acoustics, which suggests it offers a more subdued sound profile. This difference in sound characteristics means that users who favor a lively, pronounced click might prefer the Matcha, while those looking for a quieter and less intrusive sound could lean towards the Sakura.

When considering the feel of each switch, the Matcha excels in providing a comfortable, snappy tactile feedback that is categorized as stepped. This means that typists can expect a two-stage sensation, offering both pre-travel and post-travel resistance, which enhances the responsiveness of each keystroke. The snappy action of the Matcha is complemented by its accented tactility, ensuring that it remains engaging without becoming overwhelming. In contrast, the Huano Sakura gives a feather-light touch, which is designed for extended typing sessions, offering minimal exertion and reducing finger fatigue. While the Matcha leans towards a more energetic experience, the Sakura is geared towards comfort and ease of use over a long period.

Overall, the KTT Matcha and Huano Sakura switches exemplify different philosophies in the design of mechanical keyboard switches. The Matcha delivers a vibrant auditory and tactile experience, perfect for those who appreciate sharp feedback and enjoy the sounds of their keystrokes. Conversely, the Sakura is aimed at users who prioritize a softer touch and quieter performance, ideal for both productivity and gaming without overwhelming noise. Depending on one's personal preference for sound and feel, either switch can provide an enjoyable typing experience, but they cater to different needs and styles of usage.

Conclusion

In summary, when choosing between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the Huano Sakura linear switch, consider your typing style and environment. The KTT Matcha is ideal for those who enjoy a tactile experience with a satisfying, snappy feel. Its distinctly clacky sound and stepped responsiveness make it perfect for typists who appreciate auditory feedback and are looking for a lively typing experience. If you often type for extended periods and prefer a switch that strikes a balance between feedback and comfort, the Matcha will keep you engaged without leading to finger fatigue. On the other hand, if you seek a smoother, quieter experience, the Huano Sakura is an excellent choice. Its feather-light actuation suits long typing sessions, while the medium acoustics keep distractions at bay, making it a great option for shared environments or late-night work. Ultimately, your decision should hinge on whether you prioritize tactile feedback and sound or a more subdued, linear typing experience.

Mentioned in this article

KTT Matcha Tactile

$5.20

$4.88 per 10

Learn more

Huano Sakura Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more