KTT Matcha vs. TTC Venus
An in-depth look at the KTT Matcha and the TTC Venus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Matcha tactile switch to the TTC Venus linear switch, it is evident that both have unique characteristics that make them appealing to different types of users. The Matcha offers a comfortable and snappy tactility along with a clean bottom-out sound, making it suitable for those who enjoy a responsive typing experience. On the other hand, the Venus boasts a smooth and frictionless glide with a unique "Q-texture" that provides a matte sensation, perfect for users craving a buttery and muted typing feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
52g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
Lengthened 20.5mm spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Matcha and TTC Venus switches differ in their top housing material. The Matcha features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting as the translucency of polycarbonate enhances the lighting effects. In contrast, the Venus utilizes a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound compared to polycarbonate. This difference in top housing materials results in distinct sound profiles for each switch.
On the other hand, both the Matcha and Venus switches share a polycarbonate bottom housing, which contributes to their sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profiles. This similarity in bottom housing material means that when pressing down on either switch, you can expect a consistent impact and sound profile. The stiffness of polycarbonate in the bottom housing enhances the overall clarity and resonance of the switches, providing a satisfying typing experience for users. Overall, the choice of polycarbonate for the bottom housing of both switches ensures a reliable and consistent typing feel.
When it comes to comparing the effects of the top and bottom housing materials on the switches, the distinction between the Matcha and Venus becomes evident. The split in qualities between the top and bottom housing means that the bottom-out sound and feel will be influenced by the bottom housing material, while the sound when releasing a key will be more affected by the top housing material. This difference highlights how the choice of housing materials can impact the overall typing experience and sound profile of mechanical switches, showcasing the importance of selecting the right combination for desired results.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the TTC Venus linear switch, it is evident that the Matcha is the lighter option with an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. On the other hand, the Venus switch is slightly heavier, with an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 52 grams. The Matcha provides a lighter typing experience, making it ideal for those who prefer to type for extended periods or engage in long gaming sessions. In contrast, the Venus switch offers a more substantial typing experience, perfect for users who prefer a stronger push feel. Overall, both switches cater to different preferences in terms of actuation and bottom out forces, allowing users to choose based on their desired typing experience.
Travel distance
The KTT Matcha tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the TTC Venus linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. In this case, the Venus is the shorter of the two switches, with a slightly shallower travel distance compared to the Matcha. While both switches fall within the common range of travel distances, with 4 mm being more traditional and 3.8 mm being on the shorter end of the spectrum, the slight difference may be noticeable to some users. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the Venus with its shorter travel distance, while those who enjoy a more substantial keypress may opt for the Matcha with its slightly longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for key feel and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
The TTC Venus has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Venus for $5.09.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Matcha switch offers a clacky and crisp sound when pressed, providing a satisfying auditory feedback that some users find enjoyable. In contrast, the TTC Venus switch produces a low-pitched and muted sound with a subdued and thocky quality, offering a quieter typing experience that may be more suitable for shared spaces or users who prefer a more subtle sound profile. Both switches offer unique sound characteristics that can enhance the overall typing experience depending on individual preferences and usage scenarios.
Moving on to feel, the KTT Matcha switch is known for its stepped and snappy tactile feedback, providing users with a comfortable and responsive typing experience that can improve typing accuracy and speed. On the other hand, the TTC Venus switch offers a buttery and frictionless feel with a mild and polished sensation, delivering a smooth and effortless typing experience that may reduce finger fatigue and enhance overall comfort during extended typing sessions. Both switches provide distinct tactile feedback and actuation force, catering to different preferences and typing styles for a more personalized typing experience.
In conclusion, the KTT Matcha and TTC Venus switches offer unique subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel, catering to a variety of user preferences and typing styles. While the Matcha switch provides a clacky and snappy sound with stepped and snappy tactile feedback, the Venus switch offers a low-pitched and muted sound with a buttery and frictionless feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience, allowing users to customize their mechanical keyboard setup to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the TTC Venus linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you value a snappy tactility and clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha with its light actuation force may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a fluid and frictionless typing experience with a unique "Q-texture" and a nearly muted sound signature, the Venus with its light-medium actuation force may be more suited to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prioritize tactility and sound (Matcha) or smoothness and engagement (Venus) in your mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
